« Getting Acquainted with WolframAlpha | Main | NECC Inspires PR Poetry »

La. Bill Would Limit Educators' Use of Personal Tech Devices

| 4 Comments

I've heard many educators and school reform advocates talk about the importance of increased communication between teachers and parents. The more information teachers share with parents about their child's progress, the better, right?

Well, teachers in Louisiana will have to adhere to some pretty stringent guidelines for reaching out to parents and students using their own personal computers, cellphones, and other communication devices. Lawmakers in the state legislature in Baton Rouge could be close to finalizing a bill that would restrict teachers from using personal devices to communicate with their constituents.

For many educators around the country, communication with students' families often occurs before and after school. Like the conversation I exchanged with my son's 3rd grade teacher at 9:30 p.m. one night this month. It just so happened that the teacher and I were both online checking e-mail, and luckily were able to resolve whatever issue came up within a few minutes. I'm sure that my son's teacher was at her home at the time, probably tapping away at her own computer, just as I often do when I'm catching up on work e-mail in the evenings.

House bill 570, which is scheduled for a floor debate today, is intended to head off any potentially inappropriate interactions between staff and students. The bill would require teachers to use only school-issued computers, phones, and other tools to e-mail or phone parents or students. When teachers must use their own personal phones or computers, the law would require them to report the contact to the district.

I don't know if districts in Louisiana routinely provide laptops and cellphones to teachers, but it seems likely that this kind of a law would limit, if not discourage, many teachers' conversations with parents.

Does the security concern here trump the need for more teacher-parent communication? Is restricted contact necessarily a bad thing?

Aliza Libman, a Massachusetts middle school teacher, balked at first when she learned her e-mail usage would be limited to school time. But in this op-ed she describes her change of heart when she realized that limited e-mail correspondence would help her improve her overall communication with parents and give her more control over how and when she would have those big and small conversations with parents and students.

Here's a snippet:

Without e-mail at home, I’ve had to be quick and efficient at school, or risk staying hours after the work day ends. I have taught myself how to prioritize and weed out the e-mails that don’t require immediate attention, or that don’t need responses at all.

Restricted e-mail access, I’ve found, also makes me think seriously about whether there are better ways to communicate with a family or solve a problem. I don’t automatically dash off quick e-mails anymore. When I do write them, I write carefully, giving attention to every word.

Perhaps, I have concluded, e-mail is like ice cream—too much makes me sick, but life without it would be inconceivable.

Your thoughts?

4 Comments

While well intentioned, this proposed law is exactly the opposite of what we need. Teachers need to develop closer and more substantial relationships with their students, and we as a society must ensure that those relationships are appropriate and positive.

Virtually all teachers who use cell phones and computers to communicate with students do so with the best intentions -- improving their academic and social development in school. It would be a terrible shame to let a few bad apples spoil the bunch.

It's amazing. The government wants to prepare our kids for the 21st century while banishing teachers to not use the very tools that are available. It is the "one bad apple" approach all over again. What percentage of teachers use email inappropriately? I would bet it is less that 5%. So the solution is to punish the 95% that are doing the right thing instead of teaching the 5% how to do the right thing.

Why do we seem to think we can legislate or dictate our way into having a society where NOTHING goes wrong?

RIDICULOUS!

I can see an argument for both sides. I am curious to know what the intentions of the law are, and who in reality it is meant to protect.

This kind of reminds me of a HASTAC blog I read the other day about professors utilizing Facebook as a means to communicate with their students: http://www.hastac.org/node/2160. I wonder how this law, or the thinking behind it, would take this into account.

Interesting thread here. It is suggested that viewing students and cellphones as a problem associated with school is the exact opposite of fostering new approaches that can modify old stereotypes. How can these cellphones be turned into motivational teaching aids and tools that are teacher controlled and at what time of day? What about test taking activities using cellphones when students are away from campus where they are not disruptive? One needs purpose built software to do this efficiently. One example can be seen at www.rtestedu.com

School officials at PISD have long recognized the value of the student - cellphone - teacher connection. This often requires vision or thinking out of the box. Most interesting...

Comments are now closed for this post.

Follow This Blog

Advertisement

Most Viewed on Education Week

Categories

Archives

Recent Comments