« FCC Approves Process to Move Forward on E-Rate | Main | Demand for Personal Computers Steady in U.S., Thanks in Part to Schools »

House NCLB Rewrite Contains Adaptive-Testing Provision

Among the provisions included in the newly passed, GOP-only House of Representatives reauthorization of the No Child Left Behind Act is language that would allow states to fulfill federal testing requirements by using computer-based adaptive tests.

Last week, Education Week highlighted the growing support for the tests, which adjust the difficulty of their questions based on whether the test-taker gets prior answers correct. We also highlighted a lingering controversy over the nuance of how adaptive tests should be implemented—specifically, whether the exams should be allowed to ask questions above or below a student's grade level, an approach that some disability rights advocates and testing experts vehemently oppose.

Rep. Tom Petri, R-Wisconsin, a long-time supporter of adaptive tests, issued a release touting the exams' inclusion in the House rewrite.

"By including these provisions in the reauthorization of federal education policy, states will be able to better evaluate how their students are performing," said Petri in the release. "Adaptive testing is proven to be a more effective tool for assessing student performance and competence than standard paper-based testing that only shows whether a student is on grade level."

Rep. Petri's office said H.R. 5 specifically gives states the option to use tests that ask off-grade level questions to determine students' actual grade-level performance. All states will still be required to measure if students are performing at grade level or not. That language can be seen in an earlier version of the bill passed by the House's education committee.

Click here for a collection of EdWeek's NCLB-renewal coverage.

Follow @BenjaminBHerold and @EdWeekEdTech for the latest news on ed tech policies, practices, and trends.

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Follow This Blog


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments