« Teacher Retires After Slapping Student | Main | Obama's Popularity Can Shift Opinions on School Reforms, Study Says »

Duncan Praises St. Louis Public Schools

| 1 Comment
gateway_arch2%5B1%5D.jpg

It's not often that the public schools in St. Louis draw praise. For years, the district has been beset by financial and management crises while academic achievement languished and a revolving door of superintendents armed with new reform plans came and went.

Things really bottomed out two years ago when the district lost its accreditation and began answering to a state-appointed administrative board. Or, as many folks probably see it, maybe that's when things finally had a chance to get better.

Yesterday, Education Secretary Arne Duncan seemed to say that was the case when he and American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten paid a visit to the city to highlight new partnerships that have been forged by the school district and the local teachers' union, an AFT affiliate. In remarks to a large gathering of the city's educators, the secretary said he thought St. Louis "could help lead the country where we need to go and St. Louis has a chance to leap frog" ahead of other places because of its leadership, collaboration, cooperation, etc.

He singled out Kelvin Adams, the district's superintendent since last October, and union president Mary Armstrong, for their leadership.

I'm sure in places like St. Louis, where educators are used to hearing that they work in one of the worst school districts in the nation, the secretary's words are a much-welcomed salve for wounded morale.

At right, St. Louis' Gateway Arch at the Jefferson National Expansion Memorial.
Photo Credit: National Park Service

1 Comment

The 'wounded morale' of teachers does not concern teachers as much as collecting government checks. If it is so bad then why do people continue working in schools at all?

Who anyway would be happy in a large government system? Only those that are either A) willing to put up with the bureaucratic calamity because of pure dedication; or B) primarily there to exploit union and government privilege.

Any educated guess on the A/B ratio?

Comments are now closed for this post.

Follow This Blog

Advertisement

Most Viewed on Education Week

Categories

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Fallon: The 'wounded morale' of teachers does not concern teachers as read more