I'm deeply saddened by the reactions of many regarding the forthcoming address by the President of the United States to the students of this great nation because it represents much more than those 20 minutes.
Let me be clear. I did not vote for President Obama. I do not support a number of his agenda items. I still do not believe his actions can match his rhetoric. However, I have hope. I have hope because I believe in the United States. I believe in what we can do as one nation. I believe that all citizens should listen deeply to elected officials, engage critically with their ideas, and work diligently to ensure a better tomorrow.
It is why I cannot understand how we as a society can claim to want 21st Century students that are critical and creative thinkers that value civic responsibility, intellectual diversity, and global awareness yet fight against an opportunity to engage those habits and skills as a learning community.
We claim that we want students to be engaged citizens. We claim we want interdisciplinary thinkers. We claim we want lifelong learners that challenge ideas, work collaboratively to solve problems, and communicate effectively.
YET, we don't want our students exploring the idea of education simply because the President is the person starting the conversation and we fear the controversy.
Is this not an opportunity to engage in a unifying discussion? Is this not an opportunity for self and community reflection? Is this not an opportunity to think critically about a vital issue both locally and nationally? Is this not an opportunity to broaden awareness of issues for our students beyond their local community? Is this not an opportunity for respectfully debate, discourse, and growth?
We should be ashamed that our nation, our students, our schools have an opportunity to engage as a learning community but we would rather turn this into politics as usual. More importantly, we should be ashamed of what this moment represents: the great truth about the current US education system.
Given the reactions by communities and schools, it seems we still have too many across this country that do not want well-educated, 21st Century global citizens. Instead, we want sheltered individuals that only see what they are told to see, only hear what they are told to hear, and only do what they are told to do. We want factory-like schools producing narrow minded students built by prescribed curriculum centered on content, tests, textbooks, and singular sources of information. We want rigor in the form of more work and compliance. We want surface level thinkers that look at issues through a lens of fear and ignorance. We want a place for kids to be monitored.
That is why we are where we are with education. Our talks say one thing but our actions speak much louder about what we really want.
Today, I'm not proud to be an educator. I'm not proud to be a leader in education. Today, I'm deeply saddened for our students because they are the ones that suffer from our ignorance. They are the ones that pay for our inability to see the bigger, much more important picture.
Ryan Bretag
Coordinator of Instructional Technology
Glenbrook North High School
Blog: Metanoia
I so agree. I am appalled that there is any question of allowing our children to view this speech. I mean, it is historical! This is the first time that I know of that a President has spoken directly to the future of our country, the children. Maybe I should call my kids' schools and ask that they DO be allowed to watch the speech!
Well said. Thank you for your honesty. I can't believe the outrage. Why wouldn't parents want their children to listen to a speech about working hard and getting a good education?
Beautifully stated. Thank you.
Congratulations for being one of the few people who stands up for intelligence, rationality, civil discourse and open-mindedness.
I don't understand why so many people are so afraid of a man who was elected by a clear majority of the people who voted. I also don't understand why so many people who call themselves Americans favor censorship.
But what bothers me most is not the distrust of students, not the distrust ofr teachers and not the fear of what the President might say. What distresses me is the insulting level of much of the discussion.
Thank you for raising your voice and raising the level of discourse.
Come on, this President has surrounded himself with crooks, communists, Marxist, gangters, and racists. He brought this problem to himself. People do not trust him.
Well said Ryan!
Thank you for your honesty and patriotism. This is the President of the United States of America and, vote for him or not, he represents all Americans.
He is giving the opportunity to ALL students to be engaged regardless of their parents' political affiliation. This is an event of which we ALL should be proud.
I agree with your comments and thank you for articulating them so passionately and clearly.
I want to add one small point of factual clarification, though, to Teri's comment above. What Obama is doing is not so radical or unprecedented. George H.W. Bush addressed schools via a live televised address in 1991. You can read the address at the Bush Library website: http://j.mp/1YGVkG
Ryan, the country and our profession is in disarray. The president of the United States wants to stand up for what teachers are trying to accomplish. He wants to encourage students to be good students and many of our colleagues can't give him fifteen minutes to do so.
A conservative radio talk show host spreads fear in the hearts of parents and instead of bringing calmer reason to bear on the issue, we cave and run scared.
There was a time when when young people sometimes aspired to be the president of the United States. If that has changed, shame on us. If that ever is going to be the case again, educators must be the ones to lead the way.
It might go something like this. "Boys and girls, President Obama wants to talk to you today about how important your education is. Afterward we'll have a discussion about what he said. Please put away your books and give the president your attention."
Simple, huh? You'd think so. What's all the fuss about? It makes me wonder.
Thanks for the post.