leadertalk_header_515.jpg

The first group blog by school leaders for school leaders, LeaderTalk expresses the voice of the administrator in this era of school reform. (Find LeaderTalk's complete archives prior to Dec. 16, 2008, here.)

Main

October 22, 2009

How Much is Just Right?

You know that commercial for Bud Lite - Too much vs too little? I wrestled with that dilemma this week when we had to go into real lockdown mode and I had to explain the reason for it on various levels. We hadn't even had a drill yet when the real thing became necessary. It all happened during the last hour of the school day, when I received a call from the central security office informing me to lock down the school because a former employee who was acting erratically and volatile threatened to return to the school following a major blowup with district employees. We had some incidents in the past with this former employee showing up at school and making threats, which had already earned us a plain-clothes guard for several days earlier in the year.

Because the lockdown lasted longer than a normal drill, all staff and most students realized this wasn't just an ordinary drill and began asking questions. They also could see that we had an armed guard patrolling the premises. I sent an email to staff explaining the situation and to explain to students that it was a precautionary lockdown due to an outside disturbance that ultimately did not materialize. How do you explain to kids that a former employee experiencing mental instability was on the loose and making threats that could potentially harm people? We also had to explain the lockdown to parents, who are still calling to inquire about the incident and the safety of the school. The great thing in this age of immediate information is that, while I did not have time to send a letter home with over 400 students, I was able to put an explanation on my blog so that the information was out and transparent before the children arrived home with the big news of the day. And you know how kids can talk it up. While I was outside with students that day loading the buses I heard kids talking about how there was a killer on the loose and we had a SWAT team at the school.

The following morning I worked with our communications department on drafting a letter for parents that revealed the right amount of information without divulging too much or leaving too much room for inquiry and suspicion that we were covering up a potentially dangerous situation. It's definitely a fine line that we tread when we are deciding how much information is necessary. Some parents, of course, felt it was too little and wanted a more detailed explanation, while some actually thanked me for giving them the information that they did receive. I am still receiving calls daily and the message is always the same - our highest priority is providing a safe learning environment. We'll take every precaution and always err on the side of safety. It usually suffices, but there are still those that call everyday to see if we got the guy yet.

September 19, 2009

Overhauling Teacher Preparation

On August 25th, Dave Dimmet wrote about teacher quality and the future of the profession. He mentioned that training of teachers is dominated by universities who prepare pre-professional teachers to meet the licensure requirements of a given state, and asks what role post-secondary institutions play in identifying and preparing future leaders. He ends his essay acknowledging that in order to meet the needs of our savvy and sophisticated students, and to prepare them to thrive in the complex world in which they live, we must transform the K-12 learning environment and consistently identify, support, and incentivize high quality teaching.

As a testament to the urgency of this matter, the Bush Foundation (a private grantmaking foundation serving Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota dedicated to the human services) has committed to the development of highly effective new teachers in order to increase educational achievement for all students and close achievement gaps. Their goal is to increase by 50% the number of students in pre-kindergarten through grade twelve who are on track to earn a degree after high school, as well as eliminating the achievement gap. Their charge is to deliver 25,000 effective new teachers by 2018. Thus, the Bush Foundation has given 16 colleges and universities in Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota the challenge to collaboratively come up with a completely out-of-the-box overhaul of the way the institutions recruit, prepare, place, and support the states’ teachers. The foundation has $675 million dollars to invest in various projects, and one of them is to engage higher education in the transformation of teacher preparation and support it through the year 2018.

After many long days of collaborative discussion among the various institutions of higher education, there are several proposals on the table for consideration. As a partner with St. Catherine University, I was fortunate enough to be part of the Private Urban College Collaborative, which is comprised of six private colleges located in Minneapolis and St.Paul, who worked together during the past several months to put together one of the proposals for consideration. This proposal includes actively recruiting highly qualified traditional and non-traditional students, a residency program modeled after the medical profession, a master teacher institute to train highly-effective classroom teachers to become highly-effective mentor teachers, and a support system that follows students through their probationary teaching period. There are twelve pages of details, which, if our proposal is accepted, I will outline in my next submission. The proposal will be presented, along with several others, at a teacher preparation partner summit later this month. It will be interesting to hear all of the proposals and then find out which of the ones submitted by the various groups representing the three states will be accepted and funded. Stay tuned for the updates on this very exciting opportunity.

August 19, 2009

Kool-Aid Summit

Just as President Obama held a round table beer summit to assuage the race relations between two parties who were clearly at odds with each other, I have held “summits” at a round table, namely the one in my office, to similarly assuage relationships between opposing parties. But clearly what has been missing from my round table discussions is the drink. From now on, I will keep packets of Kool-Aid in my office and whenever I have to sit down at my round table with warring parties, I’ll serve some Kool-Aid. And, as President Obama gave each party at his table his choice of beer, I will give each party at my table his choice of Kool-Aid. I’m not sure it will make headlines, but it’s sure worth a shot if it means mending relationships. Gates and Crowley said they’ll attend a Boston Red Sox game together. Who knows what it could do for my kids and faculty. But you know what, if it builds relationships, I’m all for it. (I just hope it doesn’t become popular to end up at my round table just to have a little Kool-Aid).

Nancy Flynn
8-19-09

July 19, 2009

What are YOU tight about?

Last month I attended a conference led by Rick and Rebecca DuFour on building professional learning communities. It was a very engaging conference that really hit on some of the key issues we continually face as we work to develop our school into a true professional learning community (PLC). One of the questions Rich posed during a session on building a collaborative culture of a PLC was: What are you tight about? He then stressed the importance of communicating what it is to all stakeholders in the PLC. I started to think about this notion of being tight about certain things, and what those things really are. Now, the staff knows that my number one pet peeve is being late to meetings. I’m about as tight as they come when it is about being on time for meetings. But being tight is not about norms, it’s about the non-negotiables when it comes to student achievement.

After the conference ended, I gave serious consideration to what I am truly tight about, and settled on what I consider my top five non-negotiables, combining what I experience on the job and what was reinforced at the conference. These are the five non-negotiables that will be discussed opening week of school:

1. Interdependence – working together rather than in isolation. According to Patterson (2008), “Interdependence calls for individuals to share ideas, provide materials, lend a hand, and otherwise willingly and ably collaborate (p. 183).” It means using building expertise to improve student learning gained through collaboration and vertical articulation.
2. Vertical articulation – going beyond the team level in articulating student needs.
3. Common assessments across grade levels – all grade levels have a common means of assessing what is learned by all students.
4. Saying NO to averages; looking student-to-student, skill-to-skill – Even when averages look good, there will always be those students who have not learned a particular skill, and those students who already know it well. Ensure that there are interventions for students who have not learned the skill, and for those who have it mastered.
5. Embedding collaboration in routine school practices – interdependence and vertical articulation are the norm.

So, what are YOU tight about? It’s definitely something to think about.

Nancy Flynn
July 19, 2009

Resource:
Professional Learning Communities at Work, Solution Tree publication distributed at PLC Institute in Minneapolis, Minnesota, June 24, 2009.

June 19, 2009

But Do They Get the Message?

It’s cute, it’s hip, it’s a cartoon, and it’s Internet safety but, do they get the message? During the last week of school we had an educational writer from NetSmartz® Workshop come to conduct focus groups with 30 of our third through sixth graders to get their opinions on their new Internet Safety videos for their NSTeens site. NetSmartz® Workshop is a company specializing in safety education for youth, parents, and educators. Created by the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children® (NCMEC), NetSmartz set forth to spearhead a movement towards safer and more responsible use of the Internet by kids and teens.

The writer showed each group of students, grouped by age (8-9 year olds, 10-11 year olds, and 11-12 year olds), the same three videos, each with a specific message on Internet safety. The videos for NSTeens are targeted to the tweens, between the ages of 8 and 12. After viewing each clip, she asked the students to summarize the message, what they liked, what they disliked, and what was confusing about the video. The younger students spoke up far more than the older ones, which, I found out, was typical of focus groups across the United States.

After watching the videos and listening to the discussion, it was evident that most of the students got the gist of the message of each video, even though all of the students felt that the characters in the videos were much older than they were. They missed many of the nuances regarding what led up to the message, but they were able to broadly identify the “lesson” each video was attempting to get across to kids. We did not look at NetSmartzKids, which may have been more appropriate for the younger group.

To summarize the educational value of NetSmartz from the source itself:
NetSmartz offers a wide variety of multimedia educational resources for children of all ages and their trusted adults to help foster positive choices on- and offline. Parents and guardians, educators, and law enforcement can utilize innovative tools such as animated videos, community PowerPoint presentations, safety pledges, object lessons, and classroom activities at no cost from NetSmartz.org. Many of our materials are also available in Spanish to help meet the needs of Latino communities.

NetSmartz educational resources are specifically designed not to function as a traditional curriculum, but rather as adaptable tools which recognize the demanding curricula in today’s schools. Feedback from educators using NetSmartz in the classroom confirms that many prefer the flexibility of our program over other Internet safety curricula which require integration plans. Furthermore, our program resources adhere to nationally-mandated educational standards and utilize a variety of activities such as writing, role-playing, and drawing which appeal to visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles all at once. NetSmartz is also aware of the evolving risks and issues to children on the Internet; therefore, our materials are constantly updated to reflect current trends and generational learning styles.

While television used to be the entertainment of choice for kids, particularly in the summer, it is now the Internet. As more and more kids access the Internet at school, and some with very little adult supervision, and we as educators take on more of the responsibility for disseminating information to students, this is one site that I would recommend to help promote Internet safety.

By Nancy Flynn 6/19/09

Resources:

Michelle Menillo, Educational Writer for Netsmartz Workshop.

You can view this website at www.netsmartz.org.

May 19, 2009

Facebook, Take 2: Cyberbullying

Last month I wrote a somewhat humorous poem about Facebook and why I am not a big fan of the site. That article was published on April 19th. On April 20 I found myself at the table (yet again) with a group of quarreling sixth grade girls. While sixth grade girls quarreling about the he-said, she-said stuff is pretty routine, the root of this consternation stemmed from a Facebook exchange between two of the girls. When asked how this whole thing started, Salina replied: “Jenna said mean stuff on Facebook to me about Stacie. Then I told Jenna that it was mean and she shouldn’t be telling me that stuff. Then I told Stacie what Jenna was saying about her on Facebook. Then Stacie got mad and she told me that she was going to beat up Jenna. Then Jenna called everyone a skank and everyone got mad and started yelling at each other using really bad language.”

Now, although this Facebook exchange went on outside of school over the weekend, it became the topic of conversation at the lunch table on Monday. It then spilled into recess and ultimately into my office. While I have heard quite a bit about cyberbullying via emails and text messages, this was the first cyberbullying incident I had dealt with regarding Facebook. I asked each of the girls involved if she had a Facebook page and all but one said she did. I also asked them why they allowed certain girls to be on their friends list when they know that some of them will resort to this type of bullying, and most said because they felt they “had to.” This kind of pressure to allow “friends” on one’s site could also be considered a form of bullying, as they feel there may be consequences to shutting some out regardless of their lack of Internet etiquette.

According to the website stopcyberbullying.org, cyberbullying is “when a child, preteen or teen is tormented, threatened, harassed, humiliated, embarrassed or otherwise targeted by another child, preteen, or teen using the Internet, interactive and digital technologies or mobile phones.” As a public school principal, I can’t legally discipline a student for cyberbullying actions that take place outside of school that don’t result in bodily harm at school. However, when cyberbullying that has taken place outside of school becomes a school issue, as it did today, we must reserve the right to take action if the effects of outside cyberbullying threaten the safety or well-being of the student(s) in school, even if it hasn’t caused bodily harm…yet. Stopcyberbullying.org recommends adding a provision to the school’s acceptable use of the Internet policy, reserving the right to discipline the student for actions taken off-campus if they are intended to adversely affect the safety and well-being of a student while at school. According to the site, this makes it a contractual, not constitutional issue.

So far, nine states have cyberbullying laws designed to protect children from being harassed, threatened and humiliated online. Two of those states, Arkansas and New Jersey have express language in their laws that allow for school officials to take action against cyber bullies even if the actions take place outside of school.

In a 2007 USA Today article, Koloff reported that “The American Civil Liberties Union has opposed some cyberbullying laws, saying they set up school officials to trample on students' First Amendment rights. The ACLU helped block a proposal last year to expand an Oregon law to include off-campus bullying, arguing that school officials have no right to impose punishment on students for what they do away from school.”

While Minnesota (where I am a principal) enacted a law in 2007 requiring each school district in the state to put policies in place to address the growing problem of cyberbullying, there are no provisions for disciplining students for cyberbully actions. Our Acceptable Use of the Internet policy next school year will definitely not only address cyberbullying, it will include a clause that states something to the effect, “If cyberbullying outside of school becomes an issue in which a student feels threatened or unsafe in any way at school, the principal has the authority to discipline the cyber bully.” It will give the school community the clear message that cyberbullying will not be tolerated and at the very least will give me a little leverage when I need it.

By Nancy Flynn 5/19/09

References:
www.cyberbullyalert.com/blog/2008/10/cyber-bullying-state-laws-and-policies/

www.ag.state.mn.us/consumer/ylr/cyberbullying.asp

www.socialsafety.org/law_enforcement_cyberbullying.html


USA Today, 2-7-2008 States push for cyberbully controls
By Abbott Koloff, USA TODAY

April 19, 2009

Ode to Facebook

I’m a techie,
Yes I am.
But Facebook,
I don’t give a damn.

I have my friends,
My family too,
Don’t need to be viewed
Like in a zoo.

Hey look at me
I’m great and proud.
My ACTIONS speak
More clear and loud.

Why aren’t you on?
Say he and she.
I don’t like it,
It’s not me.

But everyone’s on
And it’s really fun.
I don’t care
I’d rather run.

To sit and tell
The world 'bout me
Is just not worth it
Don’t you see?

I’d rather text,
I’d rather talk.
It’s more fun
To take a walk.

Walk and talk
Or sit and chat
With real folk
'Bout this and that.

You will find me
On a bike,
Or on a course,
Or on a hike.

You will find me
If you look,
But you won’t find
Me on Facebook!

I know, I know, it’s a great way to connect with old high school and college buddies and be up on everyone’s business. And that IS great, but the last thing I need to hear from one of my students is, “Dr. Flynn, I saw you on Facebook!” Seeing me at Target is one thing, seeing me on Facebook is another. It’s definitely a boundary issue that I would hope all educators think seriously of when creating their Facebook sites and inviting others and being invited by others to have access to it. I’ve had parents of students who have invited me to be a Facebook friend, and again, I believe that is stepping beyond the boundary.

Another reason I avoid the Facebook craze is that I spend far more time at a computer than I would like. I have an iMac, an iPhone, and an iPod. I read and reply to endless emails, read innumerable articles, and continuously research educational issues. I maintain the school website, write a blog, and type letters, memos, and articles. I do data charts and graphs, budgets, staffing, and have to take online surveys. I also keep my calendar electronically, bank online, schedule medical appointments, car maintenance, and record my daily exercise. Oh, and of course, I make that occasional purchase online. So, when people ask why I don’t join Facebook, I tell them I spend enough time sitting at a computer doing what I have to do. And honestly, it’s because I just can’t (nor do I care to) sit any longer than I absolutely have to. Life is too short, I say, get out and play!

By Nancy Flynn 4-19-09

March 19, 2009

Revolutionizing Field Experience for Pre-service Teachers

Ten hours of pre-service field experience is both a requirement and right of passage for students in education programs throughout the country. How those ten hours are spent varies a great deal, and in most cases depends on the structure of the college or university. As a principal, I have a responsibility to help shape the next generation of teachers by providing classroom experience for pre-service teachers. However, I have to admit, in the past, it took very little effort on my part; an email addressed to the staff asking for volunteers to host a pre-service teacher for ten hours. Most of the time I had enough volunteers who opened their classrooms to these college students, however they did little else besides provide the classroom. All the pre-service teacher had to do was spend ten hours in the classroom, whether it be five hours on two days, one hour for ten days, or any other combination, and the classroom teacher would sign their form.

This structure did very little to prepare student teachers, as the very next semester they would come in to student teach just as green as if they had never stepped foot in a classroom before. It was time to radically change the structure and the expectations of pre-service and mentor teachers. As part of our partnership as a Professional Development School with the College of Saint Catherine, professors, teachers, and I sat down and hammered out a new and improved program of field experience for pre-service teachers. We eventually created the “literacy lab,” an intensive literacy field experience that revolutionized the ritual of ten hours of “anything goes.”

Today, three years into the program, the literacy lab is mandatory, aligned, consistent, data driven, focused, and collaborative for the benefit of all participants.

Mandatory
The literacy lab is mandatory for all of the college students enrolled in the literacy methods class. The methods class is held at our elementary school in the morning before school starts, and when the bell rings the college students join our students and teachers in the “lab.” Hosting a pre-service education student is no longer an option for my teachers at grades three through six, as the literacy lab has become a formal response to intervention. It is also mandatory for identified elementary students to participate as well. In the past, we held an after school program for students who needed additional support, but that was underfunded and poorly structured and, in many cases, the students who needed the additional help the most were the ones who did not attend, as after school programs cannot be mandated.

Aligned
Literacy content in the college methods course is always aligned with Minnesota Standards for Effective Teachers for the preparation of teachers of reading. The Lab gives pre-service teachers the opportunity to apply knowledge from the standards in an authentic setting. Mentor teachers and the college instructor give feedback on lesson plans before they are taught and provide feedback during and after teaching. This includes a debriefing session with the college instructor immediately after the pre-service teachers complete work with their guided reading groups. Literacy lab objectives are also aligned with our School Comprehensive Improvement Plan and District Strategic Plan. Our school’s overarching goal is to close the achievement gap. One of our initiatives under this goal is to continue to strengthen our partnership with the college through mandatory implementation of the literacy lab, along with joint staff development opportunities. Classroom lesson planning is then ultimately aligned with the college students’ lesson planning.

Consistent
Prior the literacy lab project, pre-service teachers taking the literacy methods courses were placed in schools throughout the metropolitan area with minimal consideration of the degree to which research based best practice might be experienced and with little control over the possibilities for their actual teaching. Today, pre-service teachers are placed in two elementary schools where they see and help with literacy blocks each time they go to the school. Each college student works each week with a small, guided reading group consisting of the same three to six students needing additional work on reading. At our school, we used to have pre-service teachers from all over the Twin Cities metro area come in at random times to put in their obligatory ten hours. Now, all of the students we work with are literacy methods students from the College of Saint Catherine. This ensures that the same college students work with the same mentor teachers and students for a full semester term on the same day and time every week.

Data Driven
The classroom teachers and I analyze the Minnesota state assessment data to determine which students are not performing at grade level proficiency in reading. We determine which students will participate in the literacy lab based on their proficiency level. There are four levels of proficiency: exceeds standards, meets standards, partially meets standards, and does not meet standards. We identified all students falling in the partially proficient range as literacy lab participants because we felt they would benefit the most from this type of intervention. Pre-service college students are assigned guided reading groups using both formative and summative data.

Focused
Once we identified which students would be participating in the literacy lab, we wanted to have the pre-service teachers focus on specific skills related to their students’ reading deficiencies. We provided the college students with additional formative data that indicated each student’s current reading level so that they would administer the appropriate reading assessments. Pre-service teachers gather data from their administration of running records, which is then reviewed with mentor teachers. Together, college students and their mentor teachers determine focus skills and strategies to work on throughout the eight weeks of their Literacy Lab.

Collaborative
The college and our elementary school have created a professional development school partnership that benefits college education students, college faculty, mentor teachers, and elementary students in various ways. By holding the college class held at the elementary school, college professors and students are able to keep abreast of exactly what is happening in the schools on a daily basis, which enables professors to continually add new, relevant material to their courses. We also started a joint book study group, which enables all college faculty and elementary staff to participate in dialogue focused on current issues in education. College professors participate on the elementary site council, and I participate on panels at the college that include conducting mock interviews with students, working with student teacher placement supervisors from around the state and, most recently, with the college’s education program accreditation process.

Our partnership continues to strengthen, and by presenting our literacy lab project at the Professional Development Schools National Conference last week, as well as by attending other sessions at the conference, we are continually exploring ways to strengthen our position as a professional development school and the means by which to shape the next generation of teachers.

References:
Fisher, B., Flynn, N., and Tierney, B. (2009). Growing stronger, How one PDS
developed from a straightforward clinical placement site into a full
partnership
presented at Professional Development Schools National
Conference, Daytona Beach, Florida.

Nancy Flynn

February 19, 2009

An Open Letter to Alex Rodriguez, New York Yankees

Dear A-Rod,

I just can't thank you enough. You have provided me with the perfect example to bestow upon my charges just when I really needed a new, fresh one. This example is not that liars and cheaters never prosper, because you certainly have prospered, but that the truth will always prevail. Kids just don't believe they'll ever get caught, especially if they bend the truth about their involvement. I'm sure you didn't believe you'd get caught, either. I am continuously counseling students on how not owning up to their actions will catch up with them, explaining that not only does it tarnish their reputation for whatever unacceptable behavior they have engaged in, but how lying about it exponentially deepens the hole they are currently digging.

A-Rod, you have not only provided me with a perfect example, but you have provided yet more proof that even big stars like yourself are not immune to falling from grace. Not only did you engage in the illegal behavior, you lied about it as well. Your behavior is no different from many of my students here. Whether it's about drugs, homework, cell phones, swearing at teachers, or steroids, the truth will prevail. Kids are always amazed at how I manage to get to the bottom of everything. Sometimes it takes a bit longer, as in your case, but in the end, justice is usually served.

Thanks for being a (not so) shining example. It's one I'll be able to use for some time.

Sincerely,
Nancy Flynn
Principal
www.randolph.spps.org

January 19, 2009

If you're not in DC, turn on the TV!

Today we are honoring one historic figure. Tomorrow, on Inauguration Day, we’ll honor another. It will be an Inauguration Day unlike any other in history. It’s a day to stop whatever you are doing and witness the historic moment. Turn on the television or Internet and have your staff and all of your students watch history unfold. Nothing is more important for your students than witnessing history!

Nancy Flynn

December 19, 2008

'Tis the Season to...

Nail it down. That is, if you want to still have it at the end of the day. The frenzy of the season and the state of the economy has trickled down to the youngest consumers. The season of “must have it” has yielded to “just take it.” Morals and values are being unwrapped quicker than any gifts under the tree.

A few examples…

I had a nice big bag of Hershey’s dark miniatures, not just the Special Dark, mind you, but Krackle dark and Mr. Goodbar dark, on my desk the other morning and it just disappeared. Of course we found the culprit through a trail of wrappers. I certainly didn’t need any more chocolate, even if it is the cholesterol-lowering dark stuff, but we still can’t send the message that stealing is okay. It didn’t faze her that she stole from the principal; nor did it faze her mother. In any case, she has a bit of community service to do this week.

A mother called to tell me her son’s boots were stolen out of the classroom by a certain student and she could not afford to replace them. I had spoken to her son the evening before about it and told him to look in the lost and found before accusing someone of stealing and that we’d continue our search for the boots in the morning. Well, that evening his mother called the mother of the student whom her son accused of stealing and ranted at her, using every obscene word not even in the dictionary. Of course the boots were in the lost and found, but the mere thought of having to lay out money that was already scarce to replace boots sent this normally rational mother into an irrational tiz.

Here’s probably one of the most unconscionable examples. One of our students, unfortunately known by his teachers as “sticky fingers” “found” a very nice cell phone just laying on the ground that he proceeded to pawn for just about anything he could get. He eventually sold this phone to his schoolbus driver for $25.00. Now, our ground is covered by several inches of snow right now so just about anything dropped would sink into the white abyss pretty easily. And this driver gave a 10-year-old $25.00 for a used cell phone that was “found” God only knows where. The bus company is now dealing with this incident and the kid is rich from, in all probability, stealing. And guess what, his mother thought nothing of it because he now has some money to spend.

We had a student who saw another student wearing his sweatshirt. The one wearing the stolen sweatshirt swore he bought it at the store just the night before. However, upon closer observation, the other child’s name was written on the label. We also had $90.00 stolen out of a social worker’s purse, but I fault her for leaving it anywhere in sight. “‘Tis the season,” I said. Lock it up or nail it down.

May your holidays be merry and bright!

Nancy Flynn

[cross-posted at the old LeaderTalk blog (including comments)]

Read more about LeaderTalk. Meet our contributors.

We’re always looking for new voices. If you think you'd be a good writer for this blog, please contact us. LeaderTalk is a CASTLE project.


CastleLogo_150.jpg

The opinions expressed in this blog are strictly those of the authors and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Editorial Projects in Education, or any of its publications.


Edweek.org's hosting of the LeaderTalk blog is underwritten in part by a grant from The Wallace Foundation.

Get RSS

Get LeaderTalk by e-mail. Enter your e-mail here:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Categories

Advertisement
<
EW Archive