I had a whole post ready for my "official" LeaderTalk day last Friday but in the end I just couldn't bring myself to click "Publish." I was a little frustrated when I wrote it and I think it needs to simmer for a bit before it's ready for prime time.

Fast-forward to this morning and a great keynote from Karl Fisch about literacy in the 21st century. Karl said a lot of great things and challenged the thinking of a lot of people in the room. This led to some great conversations throughout the morning and throughout the day.

But Karl's talk got me thinking about my "unpublished" post. I've been spinning a lot of half-formed thoughts around in my head all morning and this is my attempt at putting them together in some quasi-cohesive form.

Most of us reading LeaderTalk and publishing our blogs are basically in agreement that school, in its current iteration, leaves something to be desired in terms of its ability to meet the individual needs of students in a way that doesn't look like an assembly line. Though the methods proposed to address this deficiency vary from blog to blog and person to person, there isn't a lot of disagreement that something needs to change.

The question I'm left with, then, is that with all of this ideology around how things should look, and all these great conversations "out there," how do we carry these conversations back to our schools? If we (the schools) are supposed to "be the change [we] want to see in the world," then how do we start talking about this change at the micro level in one school?

More pointedly, how do we have a real discussion about these real ideas that doesn't somehow degenerate into (a) "If the school/district would buy me a projector/computer/document camera, then I could do this stuff," or (b) "Let's talk about tardy policies and consequences for cell phone use..."?

Is this the majority of teachers? Probably not. Are these equipment and policy issues important? Sure. Are they the most important? Not to me.

Nonetheless, I would love to get beyond them in a way that doesn't sound like I'm minimizing the concerns of the teachers for whom these are the Big Issues Of The School.

My struggle right now is trying to frame these big ideas in a simple, straightforward way that is accessible to everyone and doesn't alienate any particular group of teachers. On the other hand, part of me feels like waiting around for buy-in from everyone means we're wasting a lot of time when we could be moving ahead.

I guess don't have a lot of answers, but I sure have a lot of questions.

--

Scott Elias
http://scottjelias.net

Posted by LeaderTalk Contributor at 1:58 PM | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBacks (0)

I blogged earlier this week about the potential for collaborative technologies to have a significant impact on the way we deliver professional development in our schools. The more I think about it, the more I'm convinced that we are right on the precipice of some really powerful transformations in the ways that schools have traditionally handled staff development.

The PD Spiral

Think about professional development and you'll often think of what I've heard described as "drive by staff development." We've all been there. We talk about something (or we bring in a highly-paid consultant to talk about something), we spend a day or two on it, and then it's forgotten; vaporized into the ether like the opaque projector and the mimeograph. No one knows how it will be implemented or even whether it will be implemented. There was little or no discussion on how it will look in practice. It's just gone.

Worse, we meet after the students have gone home for the day. Everyone is exhausted and time is limited. But before the actual PD can begin, we have 87 announcements and a mess of administrivia to get through. That leaves roughly 11 minutes for the planned inservice session, by which time everyone is transfixed by the clock on the wall and ready to go home.

The Perfect Storm

I can't help but think that everything is coming together. Online tools available for free or cheap are sufficient in features and quality to deliver a powerful learning experience for teachers and administrators. Further, in our current economy, it's safe to say that districts will be scaling back on bringing in high-paid consultants to "teach us" something. Finally, the trend toward building-level instructional coaches means there are dedicated teacher leaders on campus who can support classroom teachers in implementing new teaching strategies.

Vox Populi

At my school we're not just talking the talk. When our new administrative team came to the building last year we heard the complaints loud and clear. Rather than talk about making PD meaningful, we put together a simple, online survey that took teachers less than 5 minutes to complete. We asked them rate themselves on a 1-5 scale of proficiency in several different areas that were part of the district's initiatives. We also asked them to give the top three PD topics they'd like to see as well as the one (or two) that they hoped they'd never see again.

While it now sounds forehead-smackingly obvious, how often have we as administrators taken the time to ask the teachers what they wanted? OK, maybe we've asked, but have we listened? Have we delivered? Or did we ask because that's what some seminar on shared decision-making told us we should do and then just do whatever we thought was best anyway?

No More Secrets

Using the data we gathered from our faculty, at our next pre-determined PD time, we didn't jump right in. As the resident presentation guru (gratuitous link), I prepared for the faculty a brief but comprehensive overview of the survey results so that everyone was on the same page. This way, when we announced that we would be doing a session on a particular topic, it was obvious that it wasn't just The Suits pushing their agenda, it was what people wanted.

For example, if 85% of our staff felt comfortable with accessing our district's data warehouse, we knew we didn't need to spend 4 hours on it. We offered an optional session for our new teachers or for those who wanted to refresh their memories about the site.

Bringing it Together

So now we have the data on what people want and it's pretty clear that one-size-fits-all is not going to work all the time. Sure, sometimes there are initiatives and mandates and new software that make an all-staff meeting necessary, but more often teachers' and administrators' staff development needs are pretty individual.

This is where virtual PD fits perfectly. If four people have a desire to learn best practices for digital storytelling and ten are jonesing for more info about Lexiles, you can meet those needs without subjecting every single staff member to some one-size-fits-all inservice activity that may not even make sense to them.

If we put the pieces together, it's simple. We need to honor what our teachers already know and find out what they want to learn. Collecting data, aggregating the results, sharing the results with the faculty, and using them to build a comprehensive PD plan can not only change the culture of the school, but it can raise the level of quality and engagement in your school's professional development.

Scott Elias
[Cross-posted]

Posted by LeaderTalk Contributor at 3:05 AM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (1)

(Cross-posted at Do I Dare Disturb the Universe?)

I stand in the same place every day between every class. I see hundreds of kids file past me four times a day and I never thought they even noticed or cared. I say "hi" to kids who make eye contact with me and I smile a lot. I joke with kids who bump into me while they perform the dangerous "walk and text" maneuver. But overall, I doubt many of them even know who I am.

Shortly before the holidays, I was having one of those stressful days where it seemed nothing I needed to do was coming together and I was dealing with an above average number of interruptions. I dutifully headed into the hallways between classes, "did my time," and came back to my office to continue plugging away. The day passed and -- as they always do -- things worked themselves out.

The day before we went on winter break, I was in my usual spot between classes smiling and joking with the kids as usual when a student I recognized but didn't really know walked up to me. She always says, "Hi, Mr. Elias!" on her way past, but I didn't know her name. She was just another in a sea of faces flowing past me every day on her way from class to class. That day, though, she stopped briefly. She smiled at me and said, "I'm glad to see you're in a better mood today! The other day you just didn't seem yourself. Is everything OK?"

I can't tell you how shocked I was that this student not only noticed that I was there in the same spot every day, but she'd also noticed when I wasn't my usual, goofy self when she passed by. It really made me start to think about how important it is to be cognizant of the "face" we present to our schools and communities. It's one thing to be positive and upbeat at a faculty meeting or SAC meeting -- times when you know you're being watched -- but it's another thing completely to consider that you are always "on stage."

That little experience really forced me to be more aware of how I was portraying myself to others at those less important times. And the funny thing is that when my mind is wandering to something that's stressing me out, I've found that if I try pretending to be cheerful in the halls a strange thing happens: after a while I'm not pretending anymore.

Scott Elias

Posted by LeaderTalk Contributor at 6:54 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)