NCLB: Act II

The latest news on the reauthorization of the No Child Left Behind Act.

David J. Hoff has been reporting on the biggest issues in K-12 education for more than 10 years for Education Week. He primarily reports now on the reauthorization of the No Child Left Behind Act.

« Richards Simmons Isn't Fighting Alone in Battle for P.E. | Main | Spellings Issuing Rules on Graduation Rates, Other NCLB Issues »

House Members Pick Wrong Day to Work Outside

On Earth Day tomorrow, members of the House's K-12 subcommittee will be working at the Patuxent Wildlife Research Refuge in Laurel, Md. They'll be at a hearing on the No Child Left Inside Act, which would authorize $100 million a year for states to develop curriculum to address environmental issues. For background, see this post from July.

The bill would increase student achievement in core subjects, improve the health of children, and develop a skill critical for the 21st Century workforce, says the coalition of almost 200 environmental groups supporting the legislation.

"We'll be passing on complicated environmental problems to future generations," the coalition says in this action alert. "We must give the next generation a solid understanding of these problems and the basic tools to overcome them and make informed choices in their own lives." The action alert also notes that House committee leaders included much of the No Child Left Inside bill in the NCLB discussion draft that they circulated last year.

Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley, a Democrat, will be the star witness at the hearing. Nancy S. Grasmick, Maryland's state superintendent, also will be there, as will a local principal and a conservation biologist. The hearing is scheduled to be outside, I hear.

I won't be there, unfortunately, because I'll be on assignment in Chicago. If you're planning to attend, I'd recommend wearing Gore-Tex.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.edweek.org/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/3785.

Comments

Perhaps we can get science back into our core curriculum on a regular basis through somebody's creative initiative to save our planet. I think every school should have an outdoor science classroom at every school in a district. Additionally, in order to maximize the resources and the learning experience, each school should have to focus on one specific science. Then the kids can go to different schools to learn a different area of science and get a field trip too.

It would be great if schools could do this, but is it a good idea to legislate it when schools are already having trouble meeting NCLB requirements? Will this be a mandate? Or will it just mean funding will be available for schools that choose to do this?

Comment

Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please, no profanity or personal attacks. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.

David Hoff
E-mail me

Get RSS

Get NCLB: Act II delivered by e-mail.
Enter your e-mail here:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Categories

Advertisement
Powered by
Movable Type 3.34

EW Archive