« With NCLB Debate Sidetracked, Blogging Takes Back Seat | Main | NEA Gives Extra Credit for Rep. Graves' Anti-NCLB Bill »

Palin's Surprising Education Comments Won't Matter

| 1 Comment

After reading my explanation about why NCLB doesn't matter—at least for now—Mike Petrilli assigns me the task deconstructing what Sarah Palin said about the law in her "October surprise" on education in Thursday's debate. (Sorry I'm late getting back to you, Mike. I took Friday off to be with my sons and go to their parent-teacher conferences.)

But I don't have much to say about Palin's statement. She thinks NCLB needs to be more flexible, and "it's not doing the job though." What politician wouldn't agree? She says standards are too low. Lots of people have said that. Mike Petrilli and his boss have been some of the loudest voices in that choir. She believes "our schools have got to be really ramped up in terms of the funding that they are deserving." But she doesn't say which level of government should do the ramping.

These are the type of general statements that won't matter when the next version of NCLB is written. Even if Palin is vice president when the law is reauthorized, what she said on Thursday night won't matter.

Mike, maybe I'll get back to you after Barack Obama and John McCain are done with their town hall meeting tomorrow night.

1 Comment

So from 1995 to 1999, Obama led an education foundation called the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC), and remained on the board until 2001. The group poured more than $100 million into the hands of community organizers and education activists.

The state of Chicago schools is sad. What did all of that money do? I can't find where anyone says anything successful came from the CAC. I wonder what this experience will bring to Obama's education policy.

Comments are now closed for this post.

Advertisement

Recent Comments

  • FeFe: So from 1995 to 1999, Obama led an education foundation read more

Archives

Technorati

Technorati search

» Blogs that link here