Politics K12

Politics K-12

Your education road map to state and federal politics

Michele McNeil covered education and state government in Indiana for a decade before joining Education Week as a state policy reporter in June 2006. Alyson Klein, who reports on federal education policy, joined the staff in February 2006 after nearly two years at Congress Daily.

July 2, 2009

Early Look at Duncan's NEA Speech

In his fourth and final speech on the education reform "assurances" that are featured in the economic stimulus package, Education Secretary Arne Duncan walked into the lion's den NEA convention in San Diego today and called for merit pay for teachers.

It's reminiscent of the National Education Association's big summer confab last year, when Barack Obama was just a presidential candidate, getting booed by some delegates for mentioning performance pay.

My colleague Stephen Sawchuk, who is in San Diego, will have much more on this speech (including whether Duncan gets booed) over at the Teacher Beat.

According to prepared remarks, Mr. Duncan took on some of the prized benefits of being a teacher: tenure, the salary schedule, and union protection.

On tenure:

"When an ineffective teacher gets a chance to improve and doesn’t—and when the tenure system keeps that teacher in the classroom anyway—then the system is protecting jobs rather than children. That’s not a good thing. We need to work together to change that."

On teacher evaluations:

"...to remove student achievement entirely from evaluation is illogical and indefensible."

On teacher pay:

"We’re asking Congress for more money to develop compensation programs 'with' you—and 'for' you—not 'to' you—programs that will put money in the pockets of your teachers and support personnel by recognizing and rewarding excellence."

Duncan also emphasized the importance of improving the quality of school and district leadership, calling on those leaders to accept the same new education-reform demands as teachers.

And if you need a refresher on Duncan's previous speeches on the assurances, read about his standards speech here, data here, and low-performing and charter schools here.

July 1, 2009

States Get $2.7 Billion in Early Stimulus Aid

Consider this a Happy New Fiscal Year gift from the U.S. Department of Education.

Education Secretary Arne Duncan and crew announced today that $2.7 billion in government services funding from the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund is going out early. (Vice President Joe Biden let the cat out of the bag around noon, during an update on the recovery act.) This government services money is the smaller, $8.8 billion portion of the larger $48.6 billion stabilization fund that's discretionary—funds governors can choose to use for things such as K-12 education, public safety, or any other pressing budget needs.

Federal officials were holding back $2.7 billion in government services funding, and one-third of the rest of the stabilization fund money, to make sure states spent the first round wisely. Though the government services money is going out a couple of months early, the rest of the stabilization money will still be kept for safe-keeping, until being released in the fall.

For the majority of states that have approved stabilization fund applications, they'll get their money, about $2.4 billion, today—the start of new fiscal years in most states. For those states with pending applications, they'll get their money as soon as the applications are approved.

And, by the way, every state made the department's July 1 4:30 p.m. EDT deadline for submitting their application. Texas was the last one in the door, at 4:12 p.m.

The department decided to accelerate the money after hearing that states are facing increasing budgetary pressure, even though two-thirds of the stabilization fund money has already gone out.

In a statement, Duncan said: “To date, the Department has done everything possible to get stimulus funds out the door quickly and effectively, including approving Phase I applications within 10 days. This money, which represents the final third of the government services fund, provides maximum flexibility for states to save jobs and drive reform.”

Important to remember is that just because the education department releases the money doesn't mean states immediately start spending it. The latest spending report from the department as of June 26 shows that of the $45.5 billion in overall stimulus money that's been obligated to states, only $8.7 billion of it has been drawn down by states.

UPDATED: Mayoral Control Expires in N.Y.C.

From guest blogger Lesli A. Maxwell:

Mayor Michael Bloomberg lost control over the city's public schools at midnight. Now, the mad scramble is on to figure out exactly who will be in charge of the nation's largest school system. The pre-mayoral control board of education is apparently in the process of reconstitution and is set for an emergency meeting today at noon. Mayor Bloomberg has authority to appoint two members of the seven-member panel, and two of the city's borough presidents will reportedly select members who are supportive of mayoral control.

So, despite all the chaos and confusion, it's still possible that the mayor's education policies will stay intact and Chancellor Joel Klein will remain in charge, though there will no doubt be lots of grandstanding from all sides of the issue. Until political upheaval in the New York Senate erupted last month, Bloomberg's seven-year grip on the schools, though widely debated and criticized, seemed headed for extension by state lawmakers.

As usual, GothamSchools has the best up-to-the-minute developments in this wild story.

UPDATE:(12:34 p.m.) Folks at the U.S. Department of Education told Michele that Klein called Education Secretary Arne Duncan yesterday to ask him to publicly weigh in on the issue. Duncan, if you'll remember, is a big fan of mayoral control. But it was unclear how Duncan would be able to effectively weigh in as the clock ticked toward the deadline, and before that could be figured out, mayoral control in the city expired. Nonetheless, Duncan still supports mayoral control and thinks cities should at least consider it when trying to turn around failing schools. Although Duncan has a habit of singling out states for making, in his opinion, bad policy choices, chief spokesman Peter Cunningham told Michele that this won't count against New York in the Race to the Top grants.


UPDATE (1:30 p.m.) New York City's new Board of Education, in a meeting GothamSchools' Philissa Cramer says lasted just nine minutes, voted to affirm the status quo of the last seven years.

The seven-member panel voted unanimously to keep Joel I. Klein as schools chancellor and voted 6-0 to endorse mayoral control in the form of the bill passed by the New York State Assembly, which made relatively few changes to the original 2002 law. (Dolores Fernandez, a Klein critic, abstained.)

The new board, which selected Dennis Walcott, the city's deputy mayor for education, as board president, voted to adjourn until Sept. 10.
-- guest blogger Dakarai I. Aarons

June 30, 2009

Doomsday Clock Ticking on Mayoral Control in NYC

From guest blogger Lesli A. Maxwell

So, there's less than 12 hours to go before New York City's mayoral control law expires, and the New York Senate remains in utter chaos, with few signs that sanity will prevail fast enough for members to settle on who is in charge of that chamber and to actually hold a vote on anything. Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who has been using some pretty over the top rhetoric in recent days, said in a news conference earlier today that if the law that gave him authority over the city's public schools is allowed to lapse, "the lawyers take over New York City."

All kinds of interest groups are making contingency plans for the midnight death of mayoral control, including Bronx Borough President Ruben Diaz, who has already selected his appointment for the possible return of the city's Board of Education. A group that opposes mayoral control has promised to stage a celebration of the law's demise that includes a formal "eviction" of Chancellor Joel Klein.

Check out GothamSchools for the full ticktock of all the zaniness.

UPDATED: Arne Duncan Really Does Listen

If you think Education Secretary Arne Duncan and his staff don't read the comments on their ed.gov blog, then think again.

As part of Duncan's Listening and Learning Tour, which will take him to at least 15 states in town-hall style meetings on education reform, the department has launched an online conversation asking for comments.

A comment about raising academic standards from a high school world history teacher in Princeton, Texas—Kyle Brenner—must have resonated with the education secretary.

Enough so that Mr. Duncan called Brenner today to talk about his post. So if you leave a comment, be prepared to talk about it.

UPDATE: I reached Brenner by email today, and he indicated that he and Duncan spoke for about eight minutes this morning. And here's how the conversation went, according to Brenner:

He asked me my thoughts on raising standards and I told him that the best way to raise standards was to pay teachers more but require them to get a graduate degree similar to the of a lawyer or doctor. He agreed that teacher pay was a big problem and told me that they were working on some programs to reward excellent teachers and lower the debt burden for teachers. He then I asked me if I believed that teacher pay affected young people from joining the profession. I told him that I believed it did. Finally, we talked about student incentives for raising standards. I believe that we should find a way to reward students who excel by offering reduced or free college that way all students know that if they work hard they can go...he responded that they are still studying the situation and looking for a way to give student incentives.

June 29, 2009

Eight States Procrastinate as Stimulus Deadline Nears

Schools and the StimulusThe clock is ticking toward the July 1 deadline for states to submit their applications for the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund—the $48.6 billion pie that's meant to prop up states' K-12 education budgets. Education Secretary Arne Duncan is scheduled to hold a conference call with media tomorrow to talk about this (and some higher ed stuff as well.)

As of today, the Education Department has approved 37 applications (including District of Columbia and Puerto Rico), with seven still pending. So which eight states are dragging their feet, using every last hour of their time?

• Kentucky
• Louisiana
• Missouri
• Montana
• Oklahoma
• Texas
• Vermont
• Wyoming

June 26, 2009

Stim 2: The Stimulus Strikes Back?

Schools and the Stimulus

Another stimulus package could very possibly be Coming Soon to a Congress Near You, at least if Warren Buffett has his way.

Buffett, the gazillionaire investor who has advised President Barack Obama on economic issues, told Bloomberg television that he thinks the country may need a second jolt of federal funding if the unemployment rate keeps rising. In a news conference earlier this week, Obama said Washington should give the $787 billion package, passed in February, a little longer to work before considering a sequel to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

But back when the legislation was under consideration in the House Appropriations Committee, U.S. Rep. David R. Obey, D-Wis., the panel's chairman, floated the possibility of another stimulus.

And school districts are already looking forward to some lean times after the stimulus money, which covers fiscal years 2009 and 2010, goes away.

"Fiscal year 2011 is looking very precarious," said Anthony Bent, the superintendent of the Shrewsbury, Mass., school district.

June 25, 2009

Rep. John Kline: States Should Decide How Tests Work Under NCLB

Kline.jpg

The brand-new top Republican on the House Education and Labor Committee, Rep. John Kline of Minnesota, said this morning that he's not wedded to the idea that states should test their students in reading and math once a year in grades 3-8.

In fact, he thinks that states should get to decide how often to test kids and in what grades. Obviously, that would be a "bombshell" change to the No Child Left Behind Act, since those tests are at the center of its accountability system.

Kline wasn't in Congress when the law was passed, back in 2001. He said he "agrees with the goal, how can you not?" of making sure all kids learn, but said the law takes the wrong tack.

"No Child Left Behind is too large of an intrusion of the federal government. It's telling schools what to do and how to it," he said. In talking to practitioners in his district, "everybody felt like it was a mandate."

Kline thinks that the revamped version of NCLB will probably change the 2013-14 deadline for bringing all kids to proficiency and include much more flexibility for states.

"I believe that there will be less intrusion of the federal government," he said.

Those views shouldn't come as a total surprise, given that Kline (no relation to me) is a co-sponsor of the A-plus Act, introduced by Rep. Peter Hoekstra, R-Mich., which gives states significant leeway on NCLB's accountability provisions.

But I think it's interesting that Kline got the ranking member job, apparently with the blessing of Rep. John Boehner of Ohio, the minority leader and a key author of the NCLB law. Kline's take on federal accountability seems pretty different from Boehner's, at least when he was chairman of the Education committee, and from the last lawmaker to hold the ranking member gig, Rep. Howard P. "Buck" McKeon of Calfiornia.

Unlike some other Republicans (notably former President George W. Bush), Kline doesn't think the federal government belongs in the voucher business. He likes the idea of school choice, and is upset about the end of the D.C. school choice program. But he doesn't think it's the feds' job to go around setting up school choice programs.

I asked Kline if his selection meant that Boehner and the rest of the Republican caucus had changed their minds about the federal role in accountability. He said he "didn't know" whether there is agreement on the specifics, but he said that, broadly, House Republicans agree that NCLB was too big of an intrusion on the states and that the federal role must be dialed back.

That has me wondering if the next version of the law will be bipartisan, at least in the House. Back in 2001, Boehner worked really closely on NCLB with Rep. George Miller, a Democrat from California, who at the time, was in Kline's position as the ranking member of the House Education Committee. (Back then, the GOP controlled the House. Now the Dems are in the majority, and Miller is the committee chairman.)

Given Kline's views, it's tough to see how there will be much room for bipartisanship, at least from the committee leadership. Miller may have better luck working with Rep. Mike Castle, of Delaware, who is mulling a run for Senate, and other moderates on the committee, such as Reps. Todd Platts, of Pennsylvania, and Judy Biggert, of Illinois, if he wants some Republican support for his bill.

Kline acknowledged that he and Miller don't have many views in common.

"George and I are going to differ on most things," he said. But he made it clear that they have a lot of respect for one another.

Still, there's at least one area where Kline thinks the two may find common ground: full or mandatory funding for special education. This is a huge priority for Kline, who thinks it is fundamentally unfair that the federal government mandates certain special education services while not paying its share of the bill. He wants to introduce an amendment some time this year to get that done.

Kline thinks Miller is with him on this one, but he noted that Miller "wants to create a lot of new programs" such as a green-schools program, that could divert resources from special education.

Other tidbits about Kline:

*Kline's a veteran of the Marine Corps, and his office is decorated with a row of fighter planes, but he also had some children's artwork.

*Like McKeon, he's a very congenial guy. And he knows how to charm reporters: He opened the interview with the fact that his father used to be a newspaper man.

Congressional Support of Obama/Duncan Education Agenda: What's Up?

First, Charles Barone at Swift & Change Able reports via Twitter this morning that some members of Congress are "following orders" from supporters of the education "status quo" to stop appearing with Education Secretary Arne Duncan and stop lending support to President Obama's education agenda.

And now, several moderate Senate Democrats have sent a letter in support of Obama's education message.

What's going on?

June 24, 2009

How Can Duncan Compete With Gov. Sanford's Argentinian Tango?

If you're CNN, and you have a choice between broadcasting two live events, would you choose A or B?

A: A live briefing with Education Secretary Arne Duncan about student financial aid forms getting simpler.

B: A live press conference featuring a contrarian Republican governor who went missing for a few days, was eventually thought to be hiking the Appalachian Trail, but was actually in Buenos Aires carrying out an affair with an Argentinian.

Needless to say, Duncan's White House briefing—which CNN was going to carry live—got trumped by South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford. If you'll remember, Gov. Sanford had some harsh words for Duncan in the kerfluffle over the state stabilization fund. But from now on, it's unlikely Duncan will have to put up with any more snippy letters from Sanford, who has much bigger things to worry about.

Michele McNeil

Michele McNeil
E-mail me

Alyson Klein

Alyson Klein
E-mail me


Get RSS

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Advertisement

Powered by
Movable Type 3.34

EW Archive