« In Nevada, A Tale of Two Different Teachers' Unions | Main | Discord Among Nevada Teachers Over Caucus Lawsuit »

Where the Education Action Really Is

Yes, this presidential election is very important to the future of public schools. And yes, the campaign is shaping up to be a fascinating barn-burner. But as I've been scanning headlines from across the country, I've been reminded that the nuts-and-bolts of running schools—from how many teachers a school can afford to hire to what kind of after-school programs a district can offer—are determined by state and local politicians, many of whom will be elected or re-elected this year.

Headlines from major newspapers across the country—just from the last week—foreshadow daunting budget tasks that politicians will tackle in the coming couple of years.

In Kentucky: "Possible education cuts spur fear," Courier-Journal, Jan. 12.

California: "Governor's budget would be a major setback for schools"," San Diege Union-Tribune, Jan. 13.

New Mexico: "2008 Legislature: School districts scale back requests for state funds," Santa Fe New Mexican, Jan. 13.

Kansas: "Budget worries shadow new Kansas legislative session," The Kansas City Star, Jan. 14.

Alabama: "With budget cuts on horizon, Alabama Education Association won't seek teacher raises for 2009," Birmingham News, Jan. 10.

Nevada: "School officials try to plan for cuts amid uncertainty," Las Vegas Review-Journal, Jan. 8.

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Follow This Blog


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments