Get instant email alerts from EdWeek's blogs. Learn more.

« Video: Margaret Spellings | Main | Video: Dennis Van Roekel, NEA President »

Keegan: McCain Supports Federal Accountability and GOP is on Board

| 6 Comments

As president, Sen. McCain will champion assessments and accountability, and he will be able to persuade the more conservative wing of his party, which disparages the No Child Left Behind Act as an unprecedented overreach of federal authority, to support those policies, Lisa Graham Keegan, McCain's top education adviser told me in an interview today.

She participated in the meetings last week during which the GOP hammered out its education platform and said she was surprised by the level of agreement in the room.

"I was amazed at how much coalescence there was around Sen. McCain's education agenda," she said."His agenda is the party's agenda."

But it was hard to pin her down on what kind of changes McCain would seek to the NCLB law. She mentioned growth models, which permit states to measure individual student achievement, rather than comparing different cohorts of students to one another. Okay ... but that the U.S. Department of Education already permits states to use approved growth models in their accountability systems.

And when I asked her how Sen. McCain's education policy would differ from President Bush's, she said that, "We've learned a lot from No Child Left Behind" and that McCain would seek more immediate help for students in failing schools.

"If we find out a child is not doing well, that child immediately gets tutoring, that child gets an option for a new school," she said.

I wonder if that means the prospective McCain administration would speed up the law's timetable of sanctions. Or would it just make it easier for parents to access the choice and supplemental services provisions of the law? Either way, that could be a tough sell to a Congress that in all likelihood will remain under Democratic control.

When I asked Keegan about that, she touted McCain's record working with Democrats on issues such as campaign finance reform.

"McCain is the right guy to do that," she said.

Phil Handy, who served as chairman of the Florida state board of education under Gov. Jeb Bush and is another top education adviser to the McCain campaign, was also on hand. He and Keegan told me that McCain sees the role between the federal government and the states as a partnership.

Keegan said that's a contrast from his Democratic rival, Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois, who has a more top-down approach, in her view.

"He has not taken a reform position at all," she said. "He's proposing a myriad of small [federal] programs."

And Handy reminded me that McCain has signed onto the Education Equality Project's statement, which seeks to advance the idea that schools are primarily responsible for student achievement and promotes greater accountability for teachers and public school choice. Obama has not signed that statement, a move McCain attributed to union opposition in a speech last month. So I guess they're still trying to get some mileage out of that.

Later that evening, Keegan addressed the convention. I was all primed for a speech on education policy, but she barely mentioned schools at all, except to say that McCain had supported her when she ran for Arizona school's chief.

"When I decided to run for state school superintendent in Arizona, folks were pretty skeptical," she told the delegates. "Nobody had ever run for that position before as a committed advocate for school choice. But John McCain was there for me. He even offered to be my campaign chairman."

The rest of her speech urged delegates to support hurricane recovery efforts in the Gulf Coast.

In another public appearance yesterday, at the forum sponsored by the American Solutions for Winning the Future, a nonprofit organization started by Newt Gingrich, Keegan positioned herself as a champion for accountability through testing.

"We are in serious denial in our country," Keegan said. She told a story about how she had "walk[ed] into a wealthy suburban school" and heard the principal say of the state math test for accountability, "you know what I couldn't have passed this test. And my response was 'shame on you.' They had to take me out with armed guards."

--Alyson Klein

6 Comments

Accountability=control. Politicians love control. And does anyone REALLY believe that the "experts" in DC know more than we local folks about educating our kids? Are there any teachers out there who really want the Feds telling you how to teach?
Where in our Constitution does the Federal government gain any right to control schools?
NO NCLB! Get rid of the Dept. of Ed! They just take and waste our money that could be spent on education.

It's unfortunate that the education sector has taken so long to connect the dots as to realize the whole premise behind NCLB. Standardizing assessments means a standardized curriculum and wrought by whom but by the conservitive government in DC, who like nothing better than to control how we think and how we teach, let alone think for ourselves.

NCLB Testing is teaching to the test and nothing for the Rest...that's why the dropout rates are higher under the Bush Administration than at anytime previously. Our students are not taught to think, they are taught to take tests....Teaching includes all aspects of learning and this is not possible with a curriculum that teaches only Reading/Writing and Mathematics. Educational research indicates that schools that include the arts within the curriculum have students who do better on tests and have better grades. Students enrolled in thematic or specific magnet schools also do better. Tests should be used to help shape the curriculum based on student needs not control the teaching and the curriculum within the institution.

More testing, more accounatbility, these are the earmarks of the No Child Left Behind failed experiment. The testing costs aredraining state and local budgets, while giving no real information for the cost. Testing only helps to identify problems and can be done by schools, in schools with teacher created assessments. Standardized testing identifies problems, but does not identify the causes of those problems. Teachers and scool counselors are in the best position to decern learning difficulties and to address the problems.

At least those posting here in this forum get it with NCLB, but understand the legislation was NOT written by the conservative DC establishment as many believe. I'll give you that the concept was that of, whom I'll call, King George II, but authored by perhaps the most liberal senator in Congress, Ted Kennedy.

No Child Left Behind translates into Many Children Left Behind, as conservative policy makers are working hard to destroy public education through the act's corrective measures. These include vouchers, reconstituting schools, excessive reliance on testing as a measure of success/growth, and an approach that fuels the spiral of "failure" in our poorest urban schools. The causes of failure are much larger than what takes place in the schools. The causes are societal ills that conservative lawmakers don't seem to want to look at, let alone fix. McCain's educational policies will only bring more of the same.

Comments are now closed for this post.

Follow This Blog

Advertisement

Most Viewed on Education Week

Categories

Archives

Recent Comments

  • YARGI YAYINLARI: I¡¦m now not sure where you are getting your info, read more
  • stop smoking: you have an incredible blog here! would you wish to read more
  • web hosting: Campaign K-12: 'Only Bill Richardson Has a Bold Plan for read more
  • kpss: What is Taking place i am new to this, I read more
  • domy RzeszĂłw: Iˇ¦ve recently started a website, the information you offer on read more