« Friday Readling List: Duncan Disclosures | Main | Fiscal Year 2010 Budget? Haven't We Done This Already? »

Congress Not Giving Up on Facilities


Schools and the Stimulus
So if you were following the behind-the-scenes drama of the creation of the stimulus bill, you may remember that a specially dedicated fund just for school facilities, a huge priority for President Barack Obama and Democratic leaders in Congress, was stripped out at the last minute to gain the support of some moderate lawmakers.

Apparently, those folks were worried about creating a brand-new government program when the feds have trouble funding the ones that already exist (special education and Title I).

In the end, the stimulus included some tax incentives for school construction, and it permitted districts to use a portion of their state stabilization for school facilities. But some school districts weren't very happy with the compromise.

Proponents of more funding for school facilities, including some powerful Democrats such as Rep. George Miller of California, the chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee, and Sen. Tom Harkin of Iowa, who heads up the Appropriations subcommittee that oversees education spending, argued that the program would have been a win-win-win (spur the economy, create "greener" schools that will save money over the long haul, and bolster student achievement).

Now it looks like those folks haven't given up on the idea of more resources for school facilities. On Wednesday, the House Education and Labor Committee is going to consider a bill that would authorize over $6 billion for modernization, renovation, and repair projects. A similar bill passed the House last year. Read more about it here.

The bill will most likely pass both the committee and the full House of Representatives, in which Democrats hold a majority.

The big question is what will happen in the Senate, where it's much trickier to push through legislation. That chamber didn't even bother to take up the House-passed bill in the last Congress.

Now, will Democratic leaders, with the White House and a bolstered majority, have the clout to get a school modernization program enacted into law? It remains to be seen, but if there's pushback, it's just as likely to come from conservative and moderate Democrats in the Senate as Republicans.


Upward Bound has been identified as ineffective for several years. There would be No Child Left Behind if they served the population they were intended to serve. TRiO now has almost a Billion dollars and no results. The lobbing of CEO assures this and they glean off millions of dollars from projects for their work.

Thanks for following the school facilities funding issue. Having the facilities funding taken out of the stimulus package in the Senate was maddening. It was the part of the stimulus that arguably most closely met stated stimulus goals: create jobs quickly, use on shovel-ready projects, stimulate the local economy, potentially have "green" impact. It would not have had to be a permanent program, unless they later decided it should. Let's hope they succeed when it is revisited.

Comments are now closed for this post.

Follow This Blog


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments