« Confused About Where Your State's ESSA Plan Stands? We're Here to Help | Main | Here's What States Are Doing With Their ESSA Block Grant Money »

Number of Students Using D.C. Vouchers Drops, Report Finds


President Donald Trump and U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos have heaped praise on the District of Columbia's school voucher program. But a report released Wednesday by FutureEd, a think tank housed at the McCourt School of Public Policy at Georgetown University, finds that the number of students who actually used the vouchers dropped to 1,154 in the 2016-17 school year, from 1,638 four years prior.

About a third of the students who had already snagged vouchers through the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship program didn't use them. And more than half of the students who received vouchers through the 2016 lottery didn't up enrolling in a private school. 

The drop in program participation may be partly due to problems with the DC voucher snip.PNGprogram's design, the report notes. The voucher program exists at the pleasure of Congress, which means some school administrators and parents could be reluctant to count on the money. The District gets about $45 million in federal funding, spread between the voucher program, charters, and public schools. 

What's more, the vouchers are sometimes provided after the city's private schools have completed their admissions process. And the voucher program is getting "stiff competition" from the city's charters and from rapidly improving public schools, the report notes.

The report's findings "call question whether vouchers can meaningfully increase the number of high-quality classroom seats for disadvantaged students in a district with so many public sector options," the report's authors Phyllis Jordan and Kendell Long write.

But John Schilling, the chief operating officer of the American Federation for Children, the school choice advocacy organization that DeVos once chaired, said that there may be other, more political reasons for the downturn in enrollment.

The Obama administration, Schilling wrote in an email, "imposed highly restrictive implementation rules on the program administrator that had the intended effect of depressing participation in the program." The program administrator would get thousands of applications, he said, but could only admit a limited number of interested new students. And he said that the previous administration "sat on" money that was supposed to be for new scholarships.

report released in April by the Institute for Education Sciences—the research arm of the U.S. Department of Education—found a negative impact on student achievement, and no increase in parent satisfaction among children who enrolled in the program. Parents whose children received vouchers did, however, perceive that their schools were safer. 

Schilling, however, sees the study as a "a one year snapshot." Students need at least two to four years to begin showing significant academic progress, he said. 

Don't miss another Politics K-12 post. Sign up here to get news alerts in your email inbox.

Follow us on Twitter at @PoliticsK12.

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Follow This Blog


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments