« Betsy DeVos Tells States Not to Expect Waivers From Annual Tests | Main | Senate GOP Sticks to School Choice Push in Slimmed Down Relief Proposal »

Judge Strikes Down DeVos Rule on COVID-19 Relief Funds in Nationwide Order

070820_Betsy_DeVos_AP-BLOG.jpg

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., has struck down a controversial rule championed by U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos that required public schools to direct more of their coronavirus relief funds to private school students.

Public education and civil rights groups have argued the CARES Act equitable services rule siphons needed resources away from public schools at a time when state and local funding concerns are threatening their ability to maintain staff and operations. Plaintiffs in this case, led by the NAACP, argued that DeVos violated the intent of Congress when they drafted the relief bill by introducing the additional regulation.

In a Sept. 4 ruling, federal District Court Judge Dabney L. Friedrich became the third federal judge to rule against DeVos on the issue. But, unlike the previous preliminary orders, issued by courts in California and Washington, Friedrich's summary judgment applies nationwide.

"In the end, it is difficult to imagine how Congress could have been clearer," Friedrich wrote, rejecting the Education Department's argument that it had authority to draft the regulation.

The rule, which the department officially released on July 1, governs virus relief money in the CARES Act. It directs schools to set aside money for what's known as "equitable services" for all local private school students, if they want to use the remaining money for all their local public schools. That's a departure from how federal law typically handles those services, which are normally provided to disadvantaged and at-risk students in private schools. Read more background on equitable services here

DeVos and top department officials have justified the rule by saying that the CARES Act is clearly intended to benefit all students, since all students have been hurt by the pandemic. 

Courts typically defer to federal agencies' interpretations in the case of "vague terms, contradictory provisions, or 'inartful drafting.'" But this "is not one of those cases," Friedrich wrote in an expedited judgment in the case, saying that Congress spoke "with clarity and precision" when it outlined how the CARES Act funds should be distributed.

DeVos has not said if she will appeal the Friday order.

Education groups that opposed the funding rule said the ruling provides needed clarity for public schools in deciding how to spend CARES Act funds.

Photo: U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos (Manuel Balce Ceneta / AP)


Don't miss another Politics K-12 post. Sign up here to get news alerts in your email inbox.

Follow us on Twitter @PoliticsK12And follow the Politics K-12 reporters @EvieBlad @Daarel and @AndrewUjifusa

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Follow This Blog

Advertisement

Most Viewed on Education Week

Categories

Archives

Recent Comments