Last week's announcement that the Gates and Pearson foundations are teaming up to provide online curriculum for the common standards has prompted interesting new rounds of dialogue. We reported some folks' reservations in our story, but more are still ricocheting around the blogosphere. Take, for instance, a post by EdWeek opinion blogger Diane Ravitch, who cites the Gates-Pearson deal as the "outrage of the week." The comments section of Ravitch's post neatly captures key strains in the debate about developing curriculum for the common standards: resentment about the roles of corporations, big foundations, or the federal government; worry about too ...
Most U.S. students failed to reach the proficient level on the 2010 NAEP civics exam.
The report calls the math and science competency of elementary teachers a 'blind spot' in the nation's policies to improve STEM learning.
Two Californians urge their state to keep join both testing consortia while it figures out which group's approach is best for the state.
A Washington research group urges the state assessment consortia to heed key design features that maximize usefulness of the data.
The Maryland educator will attend a White House ceremony tomorrow to be honored as the 2011 National Teacher of the Year.
An Alabama teen wins a national poetry recitation contest.
One high school student will be crowned poetry champion tonight, in an annual event sponsored by the National Endowment for the Arts and the Poetry Foundation.
The researchers suggest that less opportunity to learn challenging math corresponds to lower student achievement.
The Gates and Pearson Foundations announce plans to create complete online curricula in math and English for the common standards.