The College Board includes a previously excluded group of students in its annual report, which lowers test scores a point but allows it to claim that it maintains a popularity edge over rival ACT.
A quick roundup of developments in math, financial literacy, arts education, and book banning.
A couple of curriculum-related bits for you this morning: • We told you recently that the Partnership for 21st Century Skills was moving in with the Council of Chief State School Officers. The Thomas B. Fordham Institute's Checker Finn weighs in on this in the organization's weekly newsletter. (Hint: he doesn't have buckets of love to heap on P21. Along with a list of others, Finn's been critical of P21's ideas, arguing that they shortchange knowledge in the push for skills.) • An interesting bit of research surfaced the other day that carries a disappointing message for how well supplemental reading...
Georgia is planning to require all elementary and middle schools to use science achievement as a factor in making AYP under the No Child Left Behind Act.
A few bits to peruse on this late summer morning: • The Maryland board of education gets on its biggest district's case for the controversial curriculum contract it signed with Pearson (more about that contract here). • Whiteboard Advisors, a consulting outfit here in Washington, takes an "insiders' survey" about perceptions of the two state consortia that recently won Race to the Top assessment grants. It finds some intriguing things, and offers a little tease here. Full results are due out tomorrow. • The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation highlights its work on the common-core standards in its annual report (see Page 5). ...
A new video series intended for classroom use will explore the "science of football."
A $2 million grant from the NSF will enable researchers to study an elementary math curriculum developed in Russia.
The blogosphere hasn't exactly been spilling over with chat about the Race to the Top assessment grants awarded last week. (See story here, more on Ed Sec Arne Duncan's speech here, and details about how the consortia were judged here.) If you are craving more dialogue about these potentially influential new tests, you might want to drop by the National Journal, which is devoting a good chunk of space to that topic today. The entries are just now trickling in, so keep checking back as they stack up. The National Journal's experts-in-education forums typically draw thought-provoking input from heavy-hitters in ...
Texas may cut state spending on textbooks and science labs as part of a budget plan produced by the state education agency.
A look at the scoring sheets offers some insight into the winners—and the review process.