« The Letter From: The School Improvement Industry’s Demand Side for SYs 2009 and 2010 | Main | 5 From 1: State Education Policy Organizations »

Friday Guest Column: Searching for the End to Plagiarism

| 3 Comments

Dorothy Mikuska founded ePen&inc, developer of PaperToolsPro and PaperToolsPro Online.

guest.jpg

Imagine my shock when I read the newspaper headlines that a principal of a nearby high school had plagiarized his entire graduation speech and its valedictorian’s speech had eleven instances of plagiarism. Though extensive evidence of students plagiarizing may be startling, professional writers and educational leaders are also found plagiarizing. The integrity of the word is the basis of education and communication; steal or abuse words and learning is compromised. Schools have three choices to stem the growing prevalence of plagiarism.

First, and most popular, is directly teaching students what plagiarism is, why it is unethical, and its consequences, as stated in each school’s honesty policy. Increasing incidents of toxic text shows that students’ behavior for the most part has not changed. (Incidentally, the online honesty policy of the University of Texas at San Antonio was plagiarized word for word from another school’s policy without attribution.)

Believing that many students are both unethical and lazy and that teachers are too overworked to authenticate plagiarism, many schools employ Internet detection services, such as Turnitin, to police students by comparing papers to the contents of the software’s databases. Although these databases are extensive, they cannot compare student writing to text from websites requiring passwords, paper mill sites which email purchased papers, non-electronic sources such as books, or papers written by friends, classmates or Mom.

Preaching the school’s ethical code has proven ineffective and policing student work has taught students not to get caught by tinkering with challenged passages.
To address plagiarism effectively, its causes must first be identified. Plagiarism is an educational problem for which schools need an educational solution that provides appropriate instruction and support to overcome the four main causes: disengaged learning; poor reading skills; lack of organizational and metacognitive skills; and careless documentation.

I have watched students easily distracted while doing research, leading them to read only for main ideas, a skill they mastered in middle school. Mies van der Rohe said God is in the detail; my attorney tells me the devil is in the detail. Either interpretation tells me that details have got to be interesting—where real learning occurs, where motivation to be engaged occurs. But students skim too quickly because they value speed over reflection, simplification over synthesis, and brevity over complexity. In-depth long-term learning occurs when students analyze and synthesize information, when they organize it and reflect on their own learning, and when they evaluate and document their sources.

In the days before computers and copy machines, students recorded information on note cards with the source and page identified. Our millennial students no longer communicate with pen and paper but on a keyboard. They no longer take notes, but merely copy/paste from online sources without reflecting, analyzing, synthesizing, or evaluating their information. Research has become as mechanical as the computer. If students genuinely understood their information, plagiarism would be eliminated.

Since students do most of their research online, educators need to provide software to assist proper learning. Citation management programs like Endnote and RefWorks create bibliography entries and citations as well as the opportunity to annotate a source. PaperToolsPro, a research management tool, has created an integrated package for note taking, citations, bibliography, organization, and synthesizing information.

Schools need to rethink the causes and solutions to the growing plagiarism epidemic, beyond simple solutions, beyond just writing an honesty policy for a school, even if it is not plagiarized.

3 Comments

another great source is www.noodletools.com. It allows students to keep track of there resources and place notes along side the resources.

(Incidentally, the online honesty policy of the University of Texas at San Antonio was plagiarized word for word from another school’s policy without attribution.)

This is not actually correct:

1) It was the Student Council, not the University

2) It was a draft, not the actual policy

3) It was based on the sample policy developed by the Center for Academic Integrity and as Daniel Wuestee says at

http://www.academicintegrity.org/news_and_notes/USA_LtrToEd.php

the policy is meant to be copied and as an academic honesty policy is not meant to be an original piece of work, the CAI has no requirement for attribution at all.

While plagiarism and cheating are serious issues, it is best if we don't perpetuate urban legends, especially when the people concerned are actually trying to do their bit to make things better

cheers

Martin

Luckily, educators are getting better at detecting plagiarism and academic fraud, but vigilance is important. In a single year, the university where I work received resumes from 2 job candidates claiming degrees from diploma mills and several students were discovered to have plagiarized on multiple papers.

Comments are now closed for this post.

Advertisement

Recent Comments

  • Online Degree Educator: Luckily, educators are getting better at detecting plagiarism and academic read more
  • Martin: (Incidentally, the online honesty policy of the University of Texas read more
  • csmith: another great source is www.noodletools.com. It allows students to keep read more

Archives

Categories

Technorati

Technorati search

» Blogs that link here