« Educational (Anti)depressants: Some Links | Main | My Value-Added Bucket List »

Americans' Attitudes on Inequality: A Teacher's Dilemma

| 7 Comments
cartoon-dollar.jpg
Though the Two Americas campaign is kaput, let’s talk about a new Maxwell School poll on Americans’ attitudes towards inequality. (Juju to Andrew Leigh for the link.) What continues to surprise me is how, despite a rising tide of inequality, a high proportion of Americans still believe that everyone has a fair shot.

Here are the key findings from the September 2007 survey: Though 67.4% of Americans think that we’re becoming a society of haves and have nots and only 33.4% believe that everyone in America has an opportunity to succeed, less than half (45.7%) see the current extent of income inequality in our society as a serious problem.

And most Americans still believe in the American Dream. When asked “Do you think what you achieve in life depends largely on your family background, or on your abilities and hard work?”, only 12.3% chose family background (32.6% said both). 85% agreed that, “While people may begin with different opportunities, hard work and perseverance can usually overcome those disadvantages."

These responses varied across the income spectrum, but not as much as one might think. 31.1% of those with family incomes under $50,000 said that “just some” Americans have opportunities," while 22.4% of those with family incomes over $100,000 did. 73.8% of those with family incomes under $50,000 said we are becoming a society of haves and have nots, while 59% of those making over $100,000 did.

What does this have to do with K-12 education? Back in November, I responded to Jim Horn’s post “Work Hard, Be Nice, and Other Lies My KIPP Teacher Told Me.” Basically, the question was whether educators should preach that hard work and effort yield success irrespective of one's racial or class background. Some observers have argued that they shouldn’t. For example, in Ain’t No Makin’ It, Jay McLeod wrote:

The familiar refrain of “Behave yourself, study hard, earn good grades, graduate with your class, go on to college, get a good job, and make a lot of money” reinforces the feelings of personal inadequacy and failure that working-class students are likely to bear as a matter of course. By this logic, those who have not made it have only themselves to blame. Because it shrouds class, race, and gender barriers to success, the achievement ideology promulgates a lie, one that some students come to recognize as such.

On the other hand, what does a rejection of the “achievement ideology” look like in the classroom? Readers, please chime in.

Want to read more about research on inequality? Check out a new magazine on poverty, inequality, and social policy called Pathways. Think Ed Next, but without editorial dogma about "the establishment." The first issue includes articles by Clinton, Obama, and Edwards on the "new War on Poverty," as well as short articles about income inequality by folks like Robert Frank, Charles Murray, and Tim Smeeding. There are also ed related articles on the gender gap and housing vouchers. You can sign up for a free subscription here.
7 Comments

To be blunt, I think that Jay McLeod's ideology -- however well-meant -- is profoundly misguided. If you tell poor (that is, monetarily poor) students what might be a more realistic message ("Don't even bother; the deck is so stacked against you that you might as well not even try"), inequality can only get worse, because those students will fall even further behind the richer suburban students. Right? What else does anyone expect to happen?

Jay McLeod's ideology has always struck me as the equivalent of this: "Don't bother telling your daughter that she's a beautiful little girl. Chances are that she's really just average. In fact, better just instill in her that she's ugly as sin and that no one will ever like her."

There are perceptions. And then there is reality. Kids and parents can know both that they have the ability to do better but also understand that there needs to be a change in policy.

From today's Education News:

"Children from low-income families in the United States do not have the same access to qualified teachers as do wealthier students, according to a University of Missouri study. Compared to 46 countries, the United States had the fourth largest opportunity gap, the difference between students of high and low socioeconomic status in their access to qualified teachers.

"Comparing eighth grade math teachers from around the world, the study defined highly qualified teachers as ones who have full certification, a degree in math or math education and at least three years of teaching experience. The study found that high-achieving countries have a larger percentage of students taught by highly qualified teachers than low-achieving countries.

"When students are not taught by highly qualified teachers, their opportunity to learn is considerably lower," said Motoko Akiba, assistant professor of educational leadership and policy analysis in the College of Education at MU. "Previous studies have shown that students with similar backgrounds achieve significantly higher when taught by highly-qualified teachers."

Discouraging? Yes. Inevitable? No.

What does a rejection of the “achievement ideology” look like in the classroom?

A rejection of the achievment ideology looks like a re-examination of the ways that we teach history. Examples--Martin Luther King was a man who fought for his rights. Instead, he was a man who studied effective means of integrating belief with the marshalling of the oppressed to confront an unjust authority.

Rosa Parks didn't just get tired one day and refuse to move. She had involved herself in a study of rights and history and the Constitution and made connection with groups doing likewise, so that on that day when she refused to move she had people to call from the same jailhouse where others had just rotted for similar actions.

Teach about the growth of unions in this country, marshalling the power of organization to confront unjust conditions (Triangle Shirt Waist, company stores, scab laborers of different ethnicities shipped in to provoke violence). Teach about the countries in the world where "welfare" is not an insult--and the social contract to ensure access to such basics as employment, housing, education and health care is taken seriously.

Teach about rights and writing letters and voting. Teach about learning in supportive groups instead of as isolated "ones," each responsible only for self.

The problem with rejecting the achievement ideology is not what to do in its place. The problem is letting go of the possibility that individual action will gain more than working with the group.

Once I read this post and clicked over to the survey results, I asked the next five people I talked to -- all in the education or ed nonprofit field to guess what percentage of Americans agreed with the following statement: "While people may begin with different opportunities, hard work and perseverance can usually overcome those disadvantages." With one exception, nobody guessed higher than 50% (the poll showed 82.9%).

This is utterly unsurprising. If teachers weren't concerned about inequity, surely we would choose a sunnier vineyard in which to toil.

I'm concerned about the long-term impact, however, of failing to deliver on this hopeful view. Think for a moment about the child (every classroom has one) who comes to school ready to learn, and buys what we are selling without question. This child is neither our brightest, but far from our lowest achiever. She does her homework and everything else asked of her without complaint. She gets good grades. Not the top, but near enough. She's doing well in school.

But because she's not struggling, and becauses she's not a behavior problem, she never quite gets our full attention. We tell her she's doing great; her report cards are fine. Everything's perfect until she gets to college, and sees kids who while not as bright as she is, get good grades while she struggles. Maybe she even fails out.

Because she didn't get the education she could have had in a better environment -- and because we assured her she was fine measured against our low standards -- her job prospects are diminshed and her income not what it might have been had she sprung from a luckier womb. Now what? Because she is too bright to be sold a false bill of goods, will she tell her children to sit up in class and do whatever the teacher said, the way her mom taught her? How will she answer when the pollster calls her 20 years from now?

Maybe the question isn't about what said rejection looks like in the classroom, but what the rejection should look like in the school continuum.

For example, school counselors could be powerful allies who work with the teacher and student to discover strengths, then help the student work towards larger goals by identifying opportunities for strategic growth.

Ex: Let's say that there is a disadvantaged youngster with a scientific bent. That youth needs to know about free and low-cost community opportunities like workshops or camps where they can make connections and see if science is really their "thing." They need to know how to prepare to apply for scholarships, laying the groundwork years in advance for higher education opportunities. They should be connected with a mentor who could assist outside school hours helping the youth imagine the life of an scientist. (and so on, so forth...)

I think rejecting the Horatio Algier myth in today's classroom has more to do with connecting with students on a personal, one-on-one level than telling a group of kids that the deck is stacked against them. Young people need the encouragement to strike out beyond their circumstances, whatever they are, to pursue a life of their choosing. That encouragement takes the form of simple information and role-modeling, which impoverished students tend not to get at home.

Hello

There is a lively debate on the American Dream going on at my blog at:

http://folkpolitics.wordpress.com/2008/02/16/an-experiment-on-the-american-dream/

Is it about a rejection of achievement ideology? Or, is it about being honest with one's children in (and out) of the classroom, giving them a clear view of the road that lies ahead?

It seems that the latter is the most honest and best way. Instead of the many paternalistic approaches suggested, we treat children as the blooming intellects they are and help them understand why this country is not really meritocratic and why capitalism, with its good points, is also problematic in terms of everyone having an opportunity to "make it".

Imagine what would happen!

Comments are now closed for this post.

Advertisement

Recent Comments

  • Nathan Long: Is it about a rejection of achievement ideology? Or, is read more
  • Liberal Arts Dude: Hello There is a lively debate on the American Dream read more
  • edh: Maybe the question isn't about what said rejection looks like read more
  • Robert Pondiscio: Once I read this post and clicked over to the read more
  • Margo/Mom: What does a rejection of the “achievement ideology” look like read more

Archives

Categories

Technorati

Technorati search

» Blogs that link here

Tags

8th grade retention
Fordham Foundation
The New Teacher Project
Tim Daly
absent teacher reserve
absent teacher reserve

accountability
accountability in Texas
accountability systems in education
achievement gap
achievement gap in New York City
acting white
admissions
AERA
AERA annual meetings
AERA conference
AERJ
Alexander Russo
Algebra II
American Association of University Women
American Education Research Associatio
American Education Research Association
American Educational Research Journal
American Federation of Teachers
Andrew Ho
Art Siebens
ATR
Baltimore City Public Schools
Barack Obama
Bill Ayers
black-white achievement gap
books
books on educational research
boy crisis
brain-based education
Brian Jacob
bubble kids
Building on the Basics
Cambridge Education
carnival of education
Caroline Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby charter schools
cell phone plan
charter schools
Checker Finn
Chicago
Chicago shooting
Chicago violence
Chris Cerf
class size
Coby Loup
college access
cool people you should know
credit recovery
curriculum narrowing
D3M
Dan Willingham
data driven
data-driven decision making
data-driven decision-making
David Cantor
DC
Dean Millot
demographics of schoolchildren
Department of Assessment and Accountability
Department of Education budget
desegregation
Diplomas Count
disadvantages of elite education
do schools matter
Doug Ready
Doug Staiger
dropout factories
dropout rate
dropouts
education books
education policy
education policy thinktanks
educational equity
educational research
educational triage
effects of neighborhoods on education
effects of No Child Left Behind
effects of schools
effects of Teach for America
elite education
ETS
Everyday Antiracism
excessed teachers
exit exams
experienced teachers
Fordham and Ogbu
Fordham Foundation
Frederick Douglass High School
Gates Foundation
gender
gender and education
gender and math
gender and science and mathematics
gifted and talented
gifted and talented admissions
gifted and talented program
gifted and talented programs in New York City
girls and math
good schools
graduate student union
graduation rate
graduation rates
guns in Chicago
health benefits for teachers
High Achievers
high school
high school dropouts
high school exit exams
high school graduates
high school graduation rate
high-stakes testing
high-stakes tests and science
higher ed
higher education
highly effective teachers
Houston Independent School District
how to choose a school
IES
incentives in education
Institute for Education Sciences
is teaching a profession?
is the No Child Left Behind Act working
Jay Greene
Jim Liebman
Joel Klein
John Merrow
Jonah Rockoff
Kevin Carey
KIPP
KIPP and boys
KIPP and gender
Lake Woebegon
Lars Lefgren
leaving teaching
Leonard Sax
Liam Julian

Marcus Winters
math achievement for girls
McGraw-Hill
meaning of high school diploma
Mica Pollock
Michael Bloomberg
Michelle Rhee
Michelle Rhee teacher contract
Mike Bloomberg
Mike Klonsky
Mike Petrilli
narrowing the curriculum
National Center for Education Statistics Condition of Education
NCLB
neuroscience
new teachers
New York City
New York City bonuses for principals
New York City budget
New York City budget cuts
New York City Budget cuts
New York City Department of Education
New York City Department of Education Truth Squad
New York City ELA and Math Results 2008
New York City gifted and talented
New York City Progress Report
New York City Quality Review
New York City school budget cuts
New York City school closing
New York City schools
New York City small schools
New York City social promotion
New York City teacher experiment
New York City teacher salaries
New York City teacher tenure
New York City Test scores 2008
New York City value-added
New York State ELA and Math 2008
New York State ELA and Math Results 2008
New York State ELA and Math Scores 2008
New York State ELA Exam
New York state ELA test
New York State Test scores
No Child Left Behind
No Child Left Behind Act
passing rates
Pearson
picking a school
press office
principal bonuses
proficiency scores
push outs
pushouts
qualitative educational research
qualitative research in education
quitting teaching
race and education
racial segregation in schools
Randall Reback
Randi Weingarten
Randy Reback
recovering credits in high school
Rick Hess
Robert Balfanz
Robert Pondiscio
Roland Fryer
Russ Whitehurst
Sarah Reckhow
school budget cuts in New York City
school choice
school effects
school integration
single sex education
skoolboy
small schools
small schools in New York City
social justice teaching
Sol Stern
SREE
Stefanie DeLuca
stereotype threat
talented and gifted
talking about race
talking about race in schools
Teach for America
teacher effectiveness
teacher effects
teacher quailty
teacher quality
teacher tenure
teachers
teachers and obesity
Teachers College
teachers versus doctors
teaching as career
teaching for social justice
teaching profession
test score inflation
test scores
test scores in New York City
testing
testing and accountability
Texas accountability
TFA
The No Child Left Behind Act
The Persistence of Teacher-Induced Learning Gains
thinktanks in educational research
Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
Tom Kane
Tweed
University of Iowa
Urban Institute study of Teach for America
Urban Institute Teach for America
value-addded
value-added
value-added assessment
Washington
Wendy Kopp
women and graduate school science and engineering
women and science
women in math and science
Woodrow Wilson High School