« Join the Conversation at Edbizbuzz | Main | The Anti-Zen Links »

Richard Rothstein and the Cream Puff Caper

| 9 Comments
cream%2520puff.jpg
In a talk last Thursday at Teachers College, Richard Rothstein proposed a "Report Card on Comprehensive Equity" that would broaden the set of measures we use to assess the achievement gap. Rothstein argued that accountability systems that focus only on basic academic skills distort the educational process as schools focus more on skills for which they’re held accountable. Because we want more out of schools that math and reading scores, Rothstein proposed extending the data we collect to include domains such as critical thinking and problem solving, social skills and work ethic, readiness for citizenship and community responsibility, foundation for lifelong physical health, foundation for lifelong emotional health, appreciation of the arts and literature, and preparation for skilled work.

How could we collect these data on a nationwide scale? Rothstein explained that NAEP was originally designed to collect data on a wider range of skills, including civic engagement and students' ability to work in a group. Rothstein and his co-authors, Rebecca Jacobsen and Tamara Wilder, plan to propose an expansion of NAEP's data collection activities to the National Assessment Governing Board. Rothstein provides a clear picture of what these measures could look like here.

What of the cream puff caper, you ask? After some discussion of public education's goal of promoting physical health, attendees were greeted with plates full of cookies and cream puffs. Cream puffs that, while delicious, had the unfortunate side effect of food poisoning. Hopefully only a handful of people learned of the perils of eating dessert the hard way.

What do you think about Rothstein's proposal? I think it's an important first step in accounting for the many goals of public education that we care about. It was a formidable task to pull these data together - kudos to Rothstein, Jacobsen, and Wilder.
9 Comments

I'm not opposed to measuring this per se, but I'd rather spend my tax money on better assessments of math and literacy. Once we are sure we know that our measures of these are accurate and reliable, we'll be sure kids have the basics. Once we are sure of that, then we can measure other things. It's not that citizenship isn't important, it's vital. But the best indicator of readiness for citizenship is facility with the three R's.

I've never had food poisoning, and I'm aching from sympathy. I think there's a difference between the utility of "dashboard indicators" and a strict formula for accountability. For example, we know that states jiggered graduation rates (they always have), but I'm very skeptical of the Miller/McKeon draft not only to define a cohort graduation rate but also set arbitrary trend lines to add to AYP. Expanding federal data collection makes sense, as long as we understand it's tentative and exploratory.

I was there and asked Rothstein about a happiness/satisfaction of children and teachers index – which in NYC right now must hover somewhere near the Kelvin absolute zero point – as a counterpoint to measuring mania. Is there any joy for teachers and students at all in the current educational climate and isn't that in itself an indicator of motivation to teach and learn aside from punishment or reward? I was a bit disappointed when instead of saying there are things that do not need to be measured he said even this could/should be measured (he suggested using suicide rates which is a bit far-fetched) – well, maybe it would serve some value if a survey of some kind were done.

Later, a student in an ed program at TC came by to say she was pleased I asked that question. She had been a teacher on an Indian reservation in New Mexico and there were so many mandates and restrictions on teachers and students, there was not much joy in the process.

The idea of accountability for everything needs to be challenged (I know, we teachers just want to avoid responsibility). The climate of over accountability can poison the atmosphere between teachers and students. When you teach kids who are struggling academically and have become used to feeling like failures there's a need to build a lot of trust and teachers walk a delicate balance of encouragement and building self-esteem - I know how some disparage this - see the attitudes of Al Shanker -- as somehow being destructive.

I had an MA in reading and went through all the rigamarole of diagnosis and correction of reading problems. The biggest leap is made when you convince a child to want to read. Then the skills problems (other than dysleksia) fall by the wayside. It them may take years to catch up but it is possible. Can you measure me as a teacher in my ability to "sell" reading? Maybe give me merit pay? Give people reasonable class sizes, resources and support and then think about measuring results.

I'd like us to measure time on task. The best approach, which probably wouldn't work for a federal accountability system, would be to train students to fill out diaries, and when they recieve irregular buzzes on their cell phones, they describe what is happening around them. Accumulating thousands of snapshots FROM THE STUDENTS PERSPECTIVES would allow us to compare time on task, time lost to disciplinary disruptions, time lost to teacher incompetence, and relative time invested in lower order, higher order, and test prep instruction. It would be cost effective. And above all, it would be practical, giving us the insights needed to collaboratively devise reforms.

In the longer run, of course, Rothstein is right on target.

John,
Are you familiar with the Experience Sampling Method pioneered by Mihaly Cszikzentmihalyi and colleagues such as Barbara Schneider? You might be interested in a paper by Gad Yair entitled "Educational battlefields in America: The tug-of-war over students' engagement with instruction," published in 2000 in Sociology of Education 73:247-269. He reports on a study in which students were given digital wristwatches that beeped randomly eight times a day for a week, and students filled out a brief questionnaire about what they were doing and thinking about at the time of the beep.

Rothstein is on target, for the most part. I'm simply not sure this proposal is necessary for all districts. I'm also not sure any teacher needs to be saddled with more work.

What's interesting about this concept is it's another, in a long line of practices/trends, that seem to repeat themselves in education. When I started teaching 35 years ago, fifty percent of our report card was devoted to progress in the cognitive domain (academic) while the other fifty percent was devoted to chronicling student progress in the affective domain (social/emotional etc.). These documents were very cumbersome and time consuming and I would encourage any system considering this additional workload to think seriously before committing to it. One also needs to consider how any of this can be objectively measured or will it all simply come from the teacher's subjective opinion.

I'm extremely skeptical of the whole notion of trying to measuring all these somewhat amorphous qualities like "social skills and work ethic, readiness for citizenship and community responsibility, foundation for lifelong physical health, foundation for lifelong emotional health, appreciation of the arts and literature" etc. etc. All this measuring takes even more time and money out of the already underresourced classroom -- and as in Campbell's law tends to distort whatever processes are being measured.

I can see in NYC the monstrous accountability initiative being expanded to hundreds of millions more dollars and more assessments and more staff -- with even less money going to the classroom and less time spent on learning.

Why not instead spend our precious time and funds creating better inputs -- smaller classes, smaller teaching loads, more arts, more experienced teachers -- all the factors we really know contribute to good schools? Private schools don't spend all that time devoted to measuring the supposed outcomes of their students; why are we tying ourselves in knots doing it for public schools?

We know what a good education looks like; why not create some standards for what this encompasses and try to achieve them?

We should not under-emphasize the point Leonie makes about how private schools do things and why none of this creeps into the debate. After all, these are the most privileged kids in society and they are the ones getting low class sizes. If the answer is that such a system for the most needy is not affordable, then the supporters of elaborate accountability systems should say that they want to close the achievement gap on the cheap by focusing on things like teacher quality and accountability (I know a few NYC private school teachers who either couldn't make it in the NYC system, tried it and were horrified at the high class sizes and other issues, or blanch at the thought. By the way, do private school teachers get merit pay for high scores?)

We should notice how quickly a trillion dollars appeared for a war without much of a peep from the accountability crowd who shout that throwing money at reducing class size is a waste.

Schoolboy,

Thanks. My field was History, and since I didn't go to Ed School there are still gaps. I didn't know the people who did the study I tried to describe.

This year, we hired a superintendent from the Broad School and he did something similar. But he paid veteran administrators at the top of our poor district's pay scale to visit classes and type descriptions of what they saw into a laptop. We were told to expect six to ten of those visits, but I never understood how we could afford such a program. Neither did I understand the wisdom of spending so much money collecting such valuable information if it was kept secret. Anyway, the superintendent was forced to resign after seven months, so nobody will ever know what we could have learned had we used the evidence in a collaborative way.

Comments are now closed for this post.

Advertisement

Recent Comments

  • John Thompson: Schoolboy, Thanks. My field was History, and since I didn't read more
  • Norm: We should not under-emphasize the point Leonie makes about how read more
  • leonie haimson: I'm extremely skeptical of the whole notion of trying to read more
  • Paul Hoss: Rothstein is on target, for the most part. I'm simply read more
  • skoolboy: John, Are you familiar with the Experience Sampling Method pioneered read more

Archives

Categories

Technorati

Technorati search

» Blogs that link here

Tags

8th grade retention
Fordham Foundation
The New Teacher Project
Tim Daly
absent teacher reserve
absent teacher reserve

accountability
accountability in Texas
accountability systems in education
achievement gap
achievement gap in New York City
acting white
admissions
AERA
AERA annual meetings
AERA conference
AERJ
Alexander Russo
Algebra II
American Association of University Women
American Education Research Associatio
American Education Research Association
American Educational Research Journal
American Federation of Teachers
Andrew Ho
Art Siebens
ATR
Baltimore City Public Schools
Barack Obama
Bill Ayers
black-white achievement gap
books
books on educational research
boy crisis
brain-based education
Brian Jacob
bubble kids
Building on the Basics
Cambridge Education
carnival of education
Caroline Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby charter schools
cell phone plan
charter schools
Checker Finn
Chicago
Chicago shooting
Chicago violence
Chris Cerf
class size
Coby Loup
college access
cool people you should know
credit recovery
curriculum narrowing
D3M
Dan Willingham
data driven
data-driven decision making
data-driven decision-making
David Cantor
DC
Dean Millot
demographics of schoolchildren
Department of Assessment and Accountability
Department of Education budget
desegregation
Diplomas Count
disadvantages of elite education
do schools matter
Doug Ready
Doug Staiger
dropout factories
dropout rate
dropouts
education books
education policy
education policy thinktanks
educational equity
educational research
educational triage
effects of neighborhoods on education
effects of No Child Left Behind
effects of schools
effects of Teach for America
elite education
ETS
Everyday Antiracism
excessed teachers
exit exams
experienced teachers
Fordham and Ogbu
Fordham Foundation
Frederick Douglass High School
Gates Foundation
gender
gender and education
gender and math
gender and science and mathematics
gifted and talented
gifted and talented admissions
gifted and talented program
gifted and talented programs in New York City
girls and math
good schools
graduate student union
graduation rate
graduation rates
guns in Chicago
health benefits for teachers
High Achievers
high school
high school dropouts
high school exit exams
high school graduates
high school graduation rate
high-stakes testing
high-stakes tests and science
higher ed
higher education
highly effective teachers
Houston Independent School District
how to choose a school
IES
incentives in education
Institute for Education Sciences
is teaching a profession?
is the No Child Left Behind Act working
Jay Greene
Jim Liebman
Joel Klein
John Merrow
Jonah Rockoff
Kevin Carey
KIPP
KIPP and boys
KIPP and gender
Lake Woebegon
Lars Lefgren
leaving teaching
Leonard Sax
Liam Julian

Marcus Winters
math achievement for girls
McGraw-Hill
meaning of high school diploma
Mica Pollock
Michael Bloomberg
Michelle Rhee
Michelle Rhee teacher contract
Mike Bloomberg
Mike Klonsky
Mike Petrilli
narrowing the curriculum
National Center for Education Statistics Condition of Education
NCLB
neuroscience
new teachers
New York City
New York City bonuses for principals
New York City budget
New York City budget cuts
New York City Budget cuts
New York City Department of Education
New York City Department of Education Truth Squad
New York City ELA and Math Results 2008
New York City gifted and talented
New York City Progress Report
New York City Quality Review
New York City school budget cuts
New York City school closing
New York City schools
New York City small schools
New York City social promotion
New York City teacher experiment
New York City teacher salaries
New York City teacher tenure
New York City Test scores 2008
New York City value-added
New York State ELA and Math 2008
New York State ELA and Math Results 2008
New York State ELA and Math Scores 2008
New York State ELA Exam
New York state ELA test
New York State Test scores
No Child Left Behind
No Child Left Behind Act
passing rates
Pearson
picking a school
press office
principal bonuses
proficiency scores
push outs
pushouts
qualitative educational research
qualitative research in education
quitting teaching
race and education
racial segregation in schools
Randall Reback
Randi Weingarten
Randy Reback
recovering credits in high school
Rick Hess
Robert Balfanz
Robert Pondiscio
Roland Fryer
Russ Whitehurst
Sarah Reckhow
school budget cuts in New York City
school choice
school effects
school integration
single sex education
skoolboy
small schools
small schools in New York City
social justice teaching
Sol Stern
SREE
Stefanie DeLuca
stereotype threat
talented and gifted
talking about race
talking about race in schools
Teach for America
teacher effectiveness
teacher effects
teacher quailty
teacher quality
teacher tenure
teachers
teachers and obesity
Teachers College
teachers versus doctors
teaching as career
teaching for social justice
teaching profession
test score inflation
test scores
test scores in New York City
testing
testing and accountability
Texas accountability
TFA
The No Child Left Behind Act
The Persistence of Teacher-Induced Learning Gains
thinktanks in educational research
Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
Tom Kane
Tweed
University of Iowa
Urban Institute study of Teach for America
Urban Institute Teach for America
value-addded
value-added
value-added assessment
Washington
Wendy Kopp
women and graduate school science and engineering
women and science
women in math and science
Woodrow Wilson High School