« eduwonkette and skoolboy's AERA picks! | Main | To the Lighthouse »

Charlie Barone and I Agree!

| 1 Comment
An event so rare that it deserves its own blog post: Charlie points to a Washington Post article on NCLB and students with disabilities. The article argues that NCLB has forced schools to focus on disabled students because their scores are separately disaggregated and only a small fraction of students can be exempted. Before NCLB, too many state accountability systems had gaping loopholes that allowed these students to be ignored (for more, see here).

Of course, this brings us back to the NCLB incentives debate. If we credit the structure of the law when students with disabilities receive more attention, shouldn't we look at the structure of the law when schools emphasize tested subjects? These are questions better answered by someone with a completed AERA paper...
1 Comment

OK--so, point conceded, NCLB made schools spend more time on reading and math. Since nobody expanded the school day or year, something else had to go. Now, the key question is: what is the "right" amount of time to spend, per day, per week or per school year on math, reading, science, music, art, gym, recess, or anything? And at what grade level? If we gave all subjects equal access to the testing incentive, would we return to 42 minutes for each? Was it 42 minutes for each before NCLB? At all grade levels? Should gym classes be allowed extra time because of the time it takes to dress and shower? Should lunch get 42 minutes because everything else does? Should remediation always mean extra time? Should it be a longer day, Saturday school, summer school? When we write "extra time" on a student's IEP as an accommodation, where is the time coming from?

Some of these are silly questions, I agree. But this is the level of dialogue that seems to come out of the NCLB makes me do bad things arguments (it also makes teachers drill students on right answers in a multiple choice environment and encourages teachers to cheat). It is very hard to support the corollary that all was well pre-NCLB: that teachers were all providing the "right amount" of time to all students in all areas, and generally teachers made good decisions to support the needs of all students. Without some standard of measure (which might be annual tests, or not), it is all merely conjecture.

I would conjecture, therefore, that teachers who have fallen back on test preparation have done so because they weren't doing a demonstrably good job of teaching prior to the transparency provided by the tests. Not to say that they didn't care profoundly about their students, or education--just that they weren't able to perform at a high level in all areas--for a variety of reasons. I would also conjecture that a certain divide developed between the schools that saw the writing on the wall and approached improvement thoughtfully and those that tried to "wait out" the requirements--believing that "this, too, shall pass."

What we have seen, if anything, from the experience of NCLB, is that schools can be impacted by outside forces in ways that may be predictable, but only insofar as all forces (inside and out) can be accounted for. Where accountabiliy has had to compete with deeply held beliefs about the inferior abilities of students, progress has been limited and perversions rampant. Where resources are truly inadequate, despite the alleged boost of Title I dollars despair is the result.

Social Science is not quite physics, I think (not really knowing enough about phyics to say). As we play around with models to arrive at our goal (which is what? adequate education for all? an educated electorate? a workforce stratified by different levels of access to the benefits of education?) we are working in a very messy laboratory. When we achieve unintended results, we have to look at interactions as well as actions. Bringing students with disabilities into the mainstream of expectations has increased their exposure to education and their resulting achievement. This would support a supposition that keeping them closeted was not supportive. Setting standard expectations for mathematics has increased the amount of time devoted to it--if the problem is solved (and it doesn't seem to be) then the problem was that a lack of time resource was devoted to it. If it causes problems in other areas (reduced time), perhaps we need to find ways to solve them. At this point, I don't think we know enough to do either. More time may have provided a bit of a boost--but not a solution. Perhaps we need to look elsewhere--curriculum, training, methodology, etc.

Comments are now closed for this post.


Recent Comments

  • Margo/Mom: OK--so, point conceded, NCLB made schools spend more time on read more




Technorati search

» Blogs that link here


8th grade retention
Fordham Foundation
The New Teacher Project
Tim Daly
absent teacher reserve
absent teacher reserve

accountability in Texas
accountability systems in education
achievement gap
achievement gap in New York City
acting white
AERA annual meetings
AERA conference
Alexander Russo
Algebra II
American Association of University Women
American Education Research Associatio
American Education Research Association
American Educational Research Journal
American Federation of Teachers
Andrew Ho
Art Siebens
Baltimore City Public Schools
Barack Obama
Bill Ayers
black-white achievement gap
books on educational research
boy crisis
brain-based education
Brian Jacob
bubble kids
Building on the Basics
Cambridge Education
carnival of education
Caroline Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby charter schools
cell phone plan
charter schools
Checker Finn
Chicago shooting
Chicago violence
Chris Cerf
class size
Coby Loup
college access
cool people you should know
credit recovery
curriculum narrowing
Dan Willingham
data driven
data-driven decision making
data-driven decision-making
David Cantor
Dean Millot
demographics of schoolchildren
Department of Assessment and Accountability
Department of Education budget
Diplomas Count
disadvantages of elite education
do schools matter
Doug Ready
Doug Staiger
dropout factories
dropout rate
education books
education policy
education policy thinktanks
educational equity
educational research
educational triage
effects of neighborhoods on education
effects of No Child Left Behind
effects of schools
effects of Teach for America
elite education
Everyday Antiracism
excessed teachers
exit exams
experienced teachers
Fordham and Ogbu
Fordham Foundation
Frederick Douglass High School
Gates Foundation
gender and education
gender and math
gender and science and mathematics
gifted and talented
gifted and talented admissions
gifted and talented program
gifted and talented programs in New York City
girls and math
good schools
graduate student union
graduation rate
graduation rates
guns in Chicago
health benefits for teachers
High Achievers
high school
high school dropouts
high school exit exams
high school graduates
high school graduation rate
high-stakes testing
high-stakes tests and science
higher ed
higher education
highly effective teachers
Houston Independent School District
how to choose a school
incentives in education
Institute for Education Sciences
is teaching a profession?
is the No Child Left Behind Act working
Jay Greene
Jim Liebman
Joel Klein
John Merrow
Jonah Rockoff
Kevin Carey
KIPP and boys
KIPP and gender
Lake Woebegon
Lars Lefgren
leaving teaching
Leonard Sax
Liam Julian

Marcus Winters
math achievement for girls
meaning of high school diploma
Mica Pollock
Michael Bloomberg
Michelle Rhee
Michelle Rhee teacher contract
Mike Bloomberg
Mike Klonsky
Mike Petrilli
narrowing the curriculum
National Center for Education Statistics Condition of Education
new teachers
New York City
New York City bonuses for principals
New York City budget
New York City budget cuts
New York City Budget cuts
New York City Department of Education
New York City Department of Education Truth Squad
New York City ELA and Math Results 2008
New York City gifted and talented
New York City Progress Report
New York City Quality Review
New York City school budget cuts
New York City school closing
New York City schools
New York City small schools
New York City social promotion
New York City teacher experiment
New York City teacher salaries
New York City teacher tenure
New York City Test scores 2008
New York City value-added
New York State ELA and Math 2008
New York State ELA and Math Results 2008
New York State ELA and Math Scores 2008
New York State ELA Exam
New York state ELA test
New York State Test scores
No Child Left Behind
No Child Left Behind Act
passing rates
picking a school
press office
principal bonuses
proficiency scores
push outs
qualitative educational research
qualitative research in education
quitting teaching
race and education
racial segregation in schools
Randall Reback
Randi Weingarten
Randy Reback
recovering credits in high school
Rick Hess
Robert Balfanz
Robert Pondiscio
Roland Fryer
Russ Whitehurst
Sarah Reckhow
school budget cuts in New York City
school choice
school effects
school integration
single sex education
small schools
small schools in New York City
social justice teaching
Sol Stern
Stefanie DeLuca
stereotype threat
talented and gifted
talking about race
talking about race in schools
Teach for America
teacher effectiveness
teacher effects
teacher quailty
teacher quality
teacher tenure
teachers and obesity
Teachers College
teachers versus doctors
teaching as career
teaching for social justice
teaching profession
test score inflation
test scores
test scores in New York City
testing and accountability
Texas accountability
The No Child Left Behind Act
The Persistence of Teacher-Induced Learning Gains
thinktanks in educational research
Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
Tom Kane
University of Iowa
Urban Institute study of Teach for America
Urban Institute Teach for America
value-added assessment
Wendy Kopp
women and graduate school science and engineering
women and science
women in math and science
Woodrow Wilson High School