« Live Blogging ASCD - Go Dina! | Main | March Madness: The Achievement Gap Edition »

Really!?! Joel Klein

| 7 Comments
hear-no-evil.jpg
NYC's Panel for Education Policy voted tonight to require 8th graders to score above level 1 on reading and math tests and pass core courses in order to be promoted. Meanwhile, last week Joel Klein wanted to invest a hypothetical billionaire's bling in a research institute - "There are two things that I would do with this money. One, I would try to set up a national institute for educational policy that does serious research. This is an industry in which there are so many myths, and that’s because there are such large gaps in our knowledge right now."

Really, Joel Klein? That's surely true in some areas, but grade retention ain't one of them. Really. It's just that a recent paper by Brian Jacob and Lars Lefgren found that the 8th grade retention initiative in Chicago increased students odds of dropping out. That's on top of a boatload of other studies finding the same. Why waste that billionaire's money if you're not even going to read the research? And why are 18,000 8th graders projected to be retained if your 3rd, 5th, and 7th grade retention initiatives were so effective? Really.
7 Comments

The devil is in the details with regard to grade retention policies: what's critical is what happens to kids after they have been designated to be retained, and not all policies and programs have the same elements. But eduwonkette is correct that there are no credible examples of eighth-grade retention policies that "work," in the sense of placing failing students on trajectories for academic success. That's certainly true in Chicago.
The heart of the NYC approach to retention has been the Summer Success Academy, which purports to be an intensive academic experience that prepares students to retake the high-stakes tests that serve as gatekeepers. Students are "invited" to the Summer Success Academy. The NYC Department of Education has declared victory with the 3rd and 5th grade policy, claiming that it's been implemented successfully, and that the interventions worked, in the sense that many students who completed the Summer Success Academy advanced to the Basic performance level that enabled them to be promoted. In 2005, however, one-third of the grade 5 students who were "invited" to the Summer Success Academy did not participate at all, and another one-third completed less than 10 days of the 24-day program. Only one-third of the target students completed more than 10 days of the program that was designed to enable them to be promoted to sixth grade. Chancellor Klein: most observers would not judge a program with a completion rate of less than one-third to be successful. Really. And blaming the victim is really bad social policy. Really.

And there's already a national institute for educational policy that does serious research. And reviews serious research. If Joel Klein wants to know what research is out there on grade retention, he can contact them and ask for a customized search. Really.

http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/overview/

Well, I wouldn't count on the What Works Clearinghouse to provide a customized search on anything, let alone grade retention. The WWC has a limited number of topics that it is considering, and grade retention isn't one of them. (The same is true of the Doing What Works initiative.)

The NYC Department of Education champions the use of data to inform decisionmaking. Really. Then where are the data to support this retention policy?

Hey, Skoolboy. Your stuff rocks, by the way. You're right to point out the limits of the research reviews of WCC and DWW. However, as far as *customized* searches, I'm conveying information I received from IES consults at the ASCD conference this past weekend. Although we discussed it only briefly, *I think* regional lab reps will review all research available on a topic(via ERIC?), not just the WCC delineated topics.

Skoolboy,

You're absolutely right, of course. But you don't seem to understand what "accountability" means in this city. First of all, "accountability" applies only to unionized employees. In fact, the entire organization, under reorg Mach 3, is set up to easily pass the buck to a principal, or a school, or pretty much anyone but the folks up top.

That's why it's entire realistic for James Liebman, chief accountability officer, to literally run from concerned parents.

For those of you that love mayoral control, take heart. UFT bigshot Peter Goodman has just written on Edwize that those who wish it to sunset are "cynical."

Pardon me. "Entire" should read "entirely."

Dina: Thanks for the kind words. Historically, the regional labs lacked the capacity to be able to sift through the relevant research and make judgments about which studies were credible and which were not; and the ERIC system, which now has content experts serving as advisors, let everything that moved into the database. That was one of the rationales for the WWC: to make judgments about which studies were of sufficient technical quality to serve as a guide for policymakers and practitioners. Perhaps the labs have more capacity than they used to; that would be consistent with IES' efforts to upgrade the research infrastructure.

NYC Educator: Yes, I'm hopelessly naive. I was under the impression that political appointees ought to be accountable to the public. That doesn't mean doing everything that any citizen might demand, but it does mean listening carefully to the interests of legitimate stakeholders in the public education system, such as parents, teachers and students; taking these interests into account in making decisions; and being willing to engage in difficult conversations when there are competing interests at stake. Hey, where's that Easter bunny? I'm expecting him any day now.

Comments are now closed for this post.

Advertisement

Recent Comments

  • skoolboy: Dina: Thanks for the kind words. Historically, the regional labs read more
  • NYC Educator: Pardon me. "Entire" should read "entirely." read more
  • NYC Educator: Skoolboy, You're absolutely right, of course. But you don't seem read more
  • Dina: Hey, Skoolboy. Your stuff rocks, by the way. You're right read more
  • skoolboy: Well, I wouldn't count on the What Works Clearinghouse to read more

Archives

Categories

Technorati

Technorati search

» Blogs that link here

Tags

8th grade retention
Fordham Foundation
The New Teacher Project
Tim Daly
absent teacher reserve
absent teacher reserve

accountability
accountability in Texas
accountability systems in education
achievement gap
achievement gap in New York City
acting white
admissions
AERA
AERA annual meetings
AERA conference
AERJ
Alexander Russo
Algebra II
American Association of University Women
American Education Research Associatio
American Education Research Association
American Educational Research Journal
American Federation of Teachers
Andrew Ho
Art Siebens
ATR
Baltimore City Public Schools
Barack Obama
Bill Ayers
black-white achievement gap
books
books on educational research
boy crisis
brain-based education
Brian Jacob
bubble kids
Building on the Basics
Cambridge Education
carnival of education
Caroline Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby charter schools
cell phone plan
charter schools
Checker Finn
Chicago
Chicago shooting
Chicago violence
Chris Cerf
class size
Coby Loup
college access
cool people you should know
credit recovery
curriculum narrowing
D3M
Dan Willingham
data driven
data-driven decision making
data-driven decision-making
David Cantor
DC
Dean Millot
demographics of schoolchildren
Department of Assessment and Accountability
Department of Education budget
desegregation
Diplomas Count
disadvantages of elite education
do schools matter
Doug Ready
Doug Staiger
dropout factories
dropout rate
dropouts
education books
education policy
education policy thinktanks
educational equity
educational research
educational triage
effects of neighborhoods on education
effects of No Child Left Behind
effects of schools
effects of Teach for America
elite education
ETS
Everyday Antiracism
excessed teachers
exit exams
experienced teachers
Fordham and Ogbu
Fordham Foundation
Frederick Douglass High School
Gates Foundation
gender
gender and education
gender and math
gender and science and mathematics
gifted and talented
gifted and talented admissions
gifted and talented program
gifted and talented programs in New York City
girls and math
good schools
graduate student union
graduation rate
graduation rates
guns in Chicago
health benefits for teachers
High Achievers
high school
high school dropouts
high school exit exams
high school graduates
high school graduation rate
high-stakes testing
high-stakes tests and science
higher ed
higher education
highly effective teachers
Houston Independent School District
how to choose a school
IES
incentives in education
Institute for Education Sciences
is teaching a profession?
is the No Child Left Behind Act working
Jay Greene
Jim Liebman
Joel Klein
John Merrow
Jonah Rockoff
Kevin Carey
KIPP
KIPP and boys
KIPP and gender
Lake Woebegon
Lars Lefgren
leaving teaching
Leonard Sax
Liam Julian

Marcus Winters
math achievement for girls
McGraw-Hill
meaning of high school diploma
Mica Pollock
Michael Bloomberg
Michelle Rhee
Michelle Rhee teacher contract
Mike Bloomberg
Mike Klonsky
Mike Petrilli
narrowing the curriculum
National Center for Education Statistics Condition of Education
NCLB
neuroscience
new teachers
New York City
New York City bonuses for principals
New York City budget
New York City budget cuts
New York City Budget cuts
New York City Department of Education
New York City Department of Education Truth Squad
New York City ELA and Math Results 2008
New York City gifted and talented
New York City Progress Report
New York City Quality Review
New York City school budget cuts
New York City school closing
New York City schools
New York City small schools
New York City social promotion
New York City teacher experiment
New York City teacher salaries
New York City teacher tenure
New York City Test scores 2008
New York City value-added
New York State ELA and Math 2008
New York State ELA and Math Results 2008
New York State ELA and Math Scores 2008
New York State ELA Exam
New York state ELA test
New York State Test scores
No Child Left Behind
No Child Left Behind Act
passing rates
Pearson
picking a school
press office
principal bonuses
proficiency scores
push outs
pushouts
qualitative educational research
qualitative research in education
quitting teaching
race and education
racial segregation in schools
Randall Reback
Randi Weingarten
Randy Reback
recovering credits in high school
Rick Hess
Robert Balfanz
Robert Pondiscio
Roland Fryer
Russ Whitehurst
Sarah Reckhow
school budget cuts in New York City
school choice
school effects
school integration
single sex education
skoolboy
small schools
small schools in New York City
social justice teaching
Sol Stern
SREE
Stefanie DeLuca
stereotype threat
talented and gifted
talking about race
talking about race in schools
Teach for America
teacher effectiveness
teacher effects
teacher quailty
teacher quality
teacher tenure
teachers
teachers and obesity
Teachers College
teachers versus doctors
teaching as career
teaching for social justice
teaching profession
test score inflation
test scores
test scores in New York City
testing
testing and accountability
Texas accountability
TFA
The No Child Left Behind Act
The Persistence of Teacher-Induced Learning Gains
thinktanks in educational research
Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
Tom Kane
Tweed
University of Iowa
Urban Institute study of Teach for America
Urban Institute Teach for America
value-addded
value-added
value-added assessment
Washington
Wendy Kopp
women and graduate school science and engineering
women and science
women in math and science
Woodrow Wilson High School