« Our Very Own Disney Movie! The New York State 2008 ELA and Math Results | Main | Scale Score Magic! Why We Shouldn't Rely on Passing Rates to Measure Academic Achievement »

Live Blogging the 2008 NY State ELA and Math Press Conference

"No one should be surprised to see these kind of gains because there have been significant investments at the state and local level."

"I'm sure the people will say the test is easier. Take the test. Look at it yourself."

New York State Commissioner Richard Mills is on the offensive and doing his best to make sure that we all believe that the enormous NY state gains are not illusory. He's even put together a cute story about why performance is up:

* State invested an additional $3.4B in support for schools over 2 years.
* New grade by grade curriculum sets clear expectations.
* Schools are embracing changes in State curriculum.
* This is the third year of 3-8 testing. The system is responding.

Ask yourself two questions: First, is there any reason to believe that teachers suddenly became several times more successful in improving ELA and Math skills? Haven't we had increased investments in schools and new curricula in the past? Second, do we also see gains on other tests? Why haven't the NAEP scores skyrocketed?

But you can always count on NYC's fearless three - Jenny Medina, Erin Einhorn, and Elizabeth Green - to have their crap detectors on. Erin Einhorn of the Daily News asked about the huge jumps across the board, noting that experts tend to be suspicious of such increases. Mills first responded by saying that "we check the numbers very extensively," and then went on to argue that the gains weren't "that big." He pointed us to the mean scale scores, and showed that they are going up gradually. But if the scale scores are going up quite gradually while the proficiency scores have skyrocketed, doesn't this suggest that schools are focusing on bubble kids to bump up passing rates? More to come on the scale score data.

Elizabeth Green then asked about the state/NAEP discrepancy. Mills hemmed and hawed, first saying that these are different tests, and then changing course to note that NY's long term trend is positive. "They're going in the same general direction as the state scores. NAEP is a different test. It's a great indicator of general direction, but it's a different test," said Mills.

Below are trends for New York State and the "Big Five" districts: NYC, Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, and Yonkers.

Update: Medina's NYT article here and Einhorn's Daily News article here.



Exactly how fearless was an article entitled "New York Students Improve in Reading and Math"?

Hey, there's not a paper in the country where the reporters get to write the headlines. Nor do they get to edit their own stories. I do wish that the editorial staff at the Times were more skeptical about the NY miracle ... and small schools ... and TFA ... and ...

My 30-chart analysis of the 2008 state tests, primarily pertaining to the 4-county capital region of NY, is at http://myshortpencil.com/2008elaandmath.htm

Here are some of the factors that affect exam outcomes:

* Changes in state learning standards.

* Changes in state achievement standards. These define the levels of proficiency.

* The ratchet effect caused by converting scaled scores to performance levels.

* Changes in exam difficulty, content and/or format.

* Changes in the rules exempting students from the exams.

* Changes in testing frequency.

* Changes in grading rubrics.

* Changes in the amount of exam similarity from year to year.

* Changes in grade-level retention rates.

* Students moving into better performing school districts.

* Changes in scale score conversions or in cut-off scores.

* Improvements in gaming the test, including institutionalized cheating.

* Changes in the level of information about what will be on the test (test-content intelligence).

* Improved instruction/learning, increased classroom time spent on core subjects, improved teaching techniques from professional development, after-school classes, better assessments of students' strengths and weaknesses and more individual help.

Comments are now closed for this post.


Recent Comments

  • myshortpencil: My 30-chart analysis of the 2008 state tests, primarily pertaining read more
  • skoolboy: Hey, there's not a paper in the country where the read more
  • gp: Exactly how fearless was an article entitled "New York Students read more




Technorati search

» Blogs that link here


8th grade retention
Fordham Foundation
The New Teacher Project
Tim Daly
absent teacher reserve
absent teacher reserve

accountability in Texas
accountability systems in education
achievement gap
achievement gap in New York City
acting white
AERA annual meetings
AERA conference
Alexander Russo
Algebra II
American Association of University Women
American Education Research Associatio
American Education Research Association
American Educational Research Journal
American Federation of Teachers
Andrew Ho
Art Siebens
Baltimore City Public Schools
Barack Obama
Bill Ayers
black-white achievement gap
books on educational research
boy crisis
brain-based education
Brian Jacob
bubble kids
Building on the Basics
Cambridge Education
carnival of education
Caroline Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby charter schools
cell phone plan
charter schools
Checker Finn
Chicago shooting
Chicago violence
Chris Cerf
class size
Coby Loup
college access
cool people you should know
credit recovery
curriculum narrowing
Dan Willingham
data driven
data-driven decision making
data-driven decision-making
David Cantor
Dean Millot
demographics of schoolchildren
Department of Assessment and Accountability
Department of Education budget
Diplomas Count
disadvantages of elite education
do schools matter
Doug Ready
Doug Staiger
dropout factories
dropout rate
education books
education policy
education policy thinktanks
educational equity
educational research
educational triage
effects of neighborhoods on education
effects of No Child Left Behind
effects of schools
effects of Teach for America
elite education
Everyday Antiracism
excessed teachers
exit exams
experienced teachers
Fordham and Ogbu
Fordham Foundation
Frederick Douglass High School
Gates Foundation
gender and education
gender and math
gender and science and mathematics
gifted and talented
gifted and talented admissions
gifted and talented program
gifted and talented programs in New York City
girls and math
good schools
graduate student union
graduation rate
graduation rates
guns in Chicago
health benefits for teachers
High Achievers
high school
high school dropouts
high school exit exams
high school graduates
high school graduation rate
high-stakes testing
high-stakes tests and science
higher ed
higher education
highly effective teachers
Houston Independent School District
how to choose a school
incentives in education
Institute for Education Sciences
is teaching a profession?
is the No Child Left Behind Act working
Jay Greene
Jim Liebman
Joel Klein
John Merrow
Jonah Rockoff
Kevin Carey
KIPP and boys
KIPP and gender
Lake Woebegon
Lars Lefgren
leaving teaching
Leonard Sax
Liam Julian

Marcus Winters
math achievement for girls
meaning of high school diploma
Mica Pollock
Michael Bloomberg
Michelle Rhee
Michelle Rhee teacher contract
Mike Bloomberg
Mike Klonsky
Mike Petrilli
narrowing the curriculum
National Center for Education Statistics Condition of Education
new teachers
New York City
New York City bonuses for principals
New York City budget
New York City budget cuts
New York City Budget cuts
New York City Department of Education
New York City Department of Education Truth Squad
New York City ELA and Math Results 2008
New York City gifted and talented
New York City Progress Report
New York City Quality Review
New York City school budget cuts
New York City school closing
New York City schools
New York City small schools
New York City social promotion
New York City teacher experiment
New York City teacher salaries
New York City teacher tenure
New York City Test scores 2008
New York City value-added
New York State ELA and Math 2008
New York State ELA and Math Results 2008
New York State ELA and Math Scores 2008
New York State ELA Exam
New York state ELA test
New York State Test scores
No Child Left Behind
No Child Left Behind Act
passing rates
picking a school
press office
principal bonuses
proficiency scores
push outs
qualitative educational research
qualitative research in education
quitting teaching
race and education
racial segregation in schools
Randall Reback
Randi Weingarten
Randy Reback
recovering credits in high school
Rick Hess
Robert Balfanz
Robert Pondiscio
Roland Fryer
Russ Whitehurst
Sarah Reckhow
school budget cuts in New York City
school choice
school effects
school integration
single sex education
small schools
small schools in New York City
social justice teaching
Sol Stern
Stefanie DeLuca
stereotype threat
talented and gifted
talking about race
talking about race in schools
Teach for America
teacher effectiveness
teacher effects
teacher quailty
teacher quality
teacher tenure
teachers and obesity
Teachers College
teachers versus doctors
teaching as career
teaching for social justice
teaching profession
test score inflation
test scores
test scores in New York City
testing and accountability
Texas accountability
The No Child Left Behind Act
The Persistence of Teacher-Induced Learning Gains
thinktanks in educational research
Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
Tom Kane
University of Iowa
Urban Institute study of Teach for America
Urban Institute Teach for America
value-added assessment
Wendy Kopp
women and graduate school science and engineering
women and science
women in math and science
Woodrow Wilson High School