« Why the Achievement Gap Matters | Main | A Brief Word on Nomenclature »

Back to (Home) School


It’s back to school! Today, more than one million schoolchildren will get up from the breakfast table, strap on a backpack, and trundle off to … the living room. Home schooling has been expanding rapidly over the course of this decade, according to data from the National Center for Education Statistics, representing approximately 2.2% of the student population in 2003. (The NCES definition of home schooling is children who are schooled at home instead of in a public or private school for at least part of their education, and whose part-time enrollment in public or private schools does not exceed 25 hours per week.) skoolboy hoped to be able to report some new evidence from the Parent and Family Involvement (PFI) module of the National Household Education Survey’s 2007 sample, but those data have not yet been released. Unfortunately, that means that the best available information is from 2003, the prior wave gathering information on the incidence of home schooling. Moreover, only 239 homeschooled children were included in the PFI module of the 2003 NHES, and thus our knowledge about their characteristics isn’t very precise.

There are a lot of misconceptions about home schooling, such as homeschooled children lack normal social graces due to isolation from peers, or they’re all very well-prepared for college. skoolboy has seen no persuasive evidence of any problems of social adjustment among homeschooled children. The reality is that most homeschooled children and youth are not isolated from others; they often participate in homeschooling networks, may participate in extracurricular activities sponsored by public and private schools, and, for a significant fraction, are part of religious communities that provide opportunities for interaction with peers and adults. Homeschooled children and youth probably have fewer opportunities to interact with other youth with differing social characteristics than do students who attend public school; but you don't need to be a homeschooler to select yourself into settings where you engage almost exclusively with other people who are like you.

It’s challenging to assess the impact of home schooling on children who are home schooled, because families self-select into home schooling, and the kinds of families that choose to home school differ, on average, from those who do not. (And don’t hold your breath waiting for the definitive randomized experiment!) Homeschooled children are more likely to be white than Black or Hispanic; to be in a household with three or more children than one with fewer children; to live in a two-parent household with one parent in the labor force than in another configuration; and to have college-educated parents.

One of the most interesting features of home schooling, from skoolboy’s view, is its implications for defining teaching as a profession. For the most part, parents who home school their children are subject to very little oversight by the state. Contrast this with the rules for licensing teachers who teach in the public schools. Although eduwonkette pooh-poohs my “1950’s” thinking about what defines a profession in the sociological sense, I think she would agree that the fact that the state will allow parents with no formal training, and who are not accountable to other teachers for what they do, to teach weakens the case for teaching as a profession.

In February, a California appeals court held that parents can be prosecuted for failing to ensure that either (a) their children attend a full-time public or private day school, or (b) their children are instructed by a tutor who holds a state credential for the child’s grade level. The case alarmed home schoolers and their supporters across the country. On appeal, that same court ruled last month that “(1) California statutes permit home schooling as a species of private school education; and (2) the statutory permission to home school may constitutionally be overridden in order to protect the safety of a child who has been declared dependent.” The court made clear that it was not taking a stand on whether or not home schooling should be allowed, and blamed the California legislature for a lack of clear legislation on the issue. What counts as a threat to the safety of a dependent child is not inscribed in the law, but physical and sexual abuse (which were alleged in the California case) surely count; skoolboy’s guess is that mediocre instruction would not. (If it did, there’d be an awful lot of usual suspects to round up!)


Teaching a classroom and teaching your own child are two different things. I see homeschooling a lot more like tutoring. We don't license piano teachers or soccer coaches. It may make some sense for certification of classroom teachers, but I don't see any value in making parents jump through hoops, especially when homeschooling seems to be doing fairly well.

Homeschooling and teacher certification is very interesting when combined with the link discussion of grad students as a profession, and teacher unions vs grad student unions regarding student or employee status and the role of administration or faculty as supervisor.

I have often thought that if one graduated high school that ought to make them qualified to teach K-12. After all, doesn't it mean mastery in subject? While peer tutoring has been proven highly effective. But then we have proficient vs mastery. Although, some teachers might be considered only proficient in the subject they teach from cert to performance, and by no means has every teacher mastered the subjects they teach but that does not mean they do not result in passing students who have not? While highly qualified has not proven the path to proficient.

Who do teachers in a union serve? Their student clients or the parent employers? But with collective bargaining, their first supervisor is the union then administration. However, are teachers not the students to their classroom kids needs or just employees of the state? It is all a murky line for me. When the sup court says parental rights don't stop at the schoolhouse gate, I wonder why I have to make an appointment or go through a criminal background check just to observe my child in the classroom, and have a time limit on school grounds. I understand reasonable access but it all seems so adversarial in negating parental input and informed parental consent. After all, I could never tell my boss he couldn't see my work let alone watch or offer input. My work is for the greater good of my employer. Is there some cache to being a grad student vs a teacher? Is being a parent a profession?

I have the right to reproduce and raise my child till the age of 6 without state or federal mandate. But then my child must be educated, as I presumably am or more, and I am expected to accept blindly that a profession knows how to educate my child better than I do since I am expected to work for the state? While if I don't adequately provide for them, they can be removed. Schools get to visit my home and know how much money I make but we can't see their check book, let alone unfettered access to student records. How is it possible that as a parent I am responsible for a failing school I can't get into in a meaningful way outside of expected fundraising? I forgot, I'm a bad parent to begin with but there is no collective bargaining for me at the school level only punishment for Timmy. Can't we all just get along and remediate Timmy's dyslexia? I know it's in the Bible but let me see if it's in my contract...

You would think teachers answer to their students as their performance rates their own, and the kids answer to their parents? While strong home-school communication has proven an effective learning environment. But parents must address administration, not faculty, who then addresses the union. The teacher addresses the union who speaks to administration. No faculty involved as parent concerns, while they may be unique to individual schools, need to be voiced in the open for the collective powers that be to expunge any dissent. Zero tolerance. This places all the onerous on the parent vs classroom. The kids needs are left out of the legalistic and compliance-focused loop. With homeschooling, we answer to the kids and answer their questions too. There is no ambiguous supervisor, no membership, and no separate but not equal sped placement. IMO, homeschooling follows the model of higher ed. Homeschooled students are grad students in training. They lead their curriculum, discussions, labs, grading, etc. Parents as teachers are a true collaborative classroom.

Comments are now closed for this post.


Recent Comments

  • FeFe: Homeschooling and teacher certification is very interesting when combined with read more
  • Henry Cate: Teaching a classroom and teaching your own child are two read more




Technorati search

» Blogs that link here


8th grade retention
Fordham Foundation
The New Teacher Project
Tim Daly
absent teacher reserve
absent teacher reserve

accountability in Texas
accountability systems in education
achievement gap
achievement gap in New York City
acting white
AERA annual meetings
AERA conference
Alexander Russo
Algebra II
American Association of University Women
American Education Research Associatio
American Education Research Association
American Educational Research Journal
American Federation of Teachers
Andrew Ho
Art Siebens
Baltimore City Public Schools
Barack Obama
Bill Ayers
black-white achievement gap
books on educational research
boy crisis
brain-based education
Brian Jacob
bubble kids
Building on the Basics
Cambridge Education
carnival of education
Caroline Hoxby
Caroline Hoxby charter schools
cell phone plan
charter schools
Checker Finn
Chicago shooting
Chicago violence
Chris Cerf
class size
Coby Loup
college access
cool people you should know
credit recovery
curriculum narrowing
Dan Willingham
data driven
data-driven decision making
data-driven decision-making
David Cantor
Dean Millot
demographics of schoolchildren
Department of Assessment and Accountability
Department of Education budget
Diplomas Count
disadvantages of elite education
do schools matter
Doug Ready
Doug Staiger
dropout factories
dropout rate
education books
education policy
education policy thinktanks
educational equity
educational research
educational triage
effects of neighborhoods on education
effects of No Child Left Behind
effects of schools
effects of Teach for America
elite education
Everyday Antiracism
excessed teachers
exit exams
experienced teachers
Fordham and Ogbu
Fordham Foundation
Frederick Douglass High School
Gates Foundation
gender and education
gender and math
gender and science and mathematics
gifted and talented
gifted and talented admissions
gifted and talented program
gifted and talented programs in New York City
girls and math
good schools
graduate student union
graduation rate
graduation rates
guns in Chicago
health benefits for teachers
High Achievers
high school
high school dropouts
high school exit exams
high school graduates
high school graduation rate
high-stakes testing
high-stakes tests and science
higher ed
higher education
highly effective teachers
Houston Independent School District
how to choose a school
incentives in education
Institute for Education Sciences
is teaching a profession?
is the No Child Left Behind Act working
Jay Greene
Jim Liebman
Joel Klein
John Merrow
Jonah Rockoff
Kevin Carey
KIPP and boys
KIPP and gender
Lake Woebegon
Lars Lefgren
leaving teaching
Leonard Sax
Liam Julian

Marcus Winters
math achievement for girls
meaning of high school diploma
Mica Pollock
Michael Bloomberg
Michelle Rhee
Michelle Rhee teacher contract
Mike Bloomberg
Mike Klonsky
Mike Petrilli
narrowing the curriculum
National Center for Education Statistics Condition of Education
new teachers
New York City
New York City bonuses for principals
New York City budget
New York City Budget cuts
New York City budget cuts
New York City Department of Education
New York City Department of Education Truth Squad
New York City ELA and Math Results 2008
New York City gifted and talented
New York City Progress Report
New York City Quality Review
New York City school budget cuts
New York City school closing
New York City schools
New York City small schools
New York City social promotion
New York City teacher experiment
New York City teacher salaries
New York City teacher tenure
New York City Test scores 2008
New York City value-added
New York State ELA and Math 2008
New York State ELA and Math Results 2008
New York State ELA and Math Scores 2008
New York State ELA Exam
New York state ELA test
New York State Test scores
No Child Left Behind
No Child Left Behind Act
passing rates
picking a school
press office
principal bonuses
proficiency scores
push outs
qualitative educational research
qualitative research in education
quitting teaching
race and education
racial segregation in schools
Randall Reback
Randi Weingarten
Randy Reback
recovering credits in high school
Rick Hess
Robert Balfanz
Robert Pondiscio
Roland Fryer
Russ Whitehurst
Sarah Reckhow
school budget cuts in New York City
school choice
school effects
school integration
single sex education
small schools
small schools in New York City
social justice teaching
Sol Stern
Stefanie DeLuca
stereotype threat
talented and gifted
talking about race
talking about race in schools
Teach for America
teacher effectiveness
teacher effects
teacher quailty
teacher quality
teacher tenure
teachers and obesity
Teachers College
teachers versus doctors
teaching as career
teaching for social justice
teaching profession
test score inflation
test scores
test scores in New York City
testing and accountability
Texas accountability
The No Child Left Behind Act
The Persistence of Teacher-Induced Learning Gains
thinktanks in educational research
Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
Tom Kane
University of Iowa
Urban Institute study of Teach for America
Urban Institute Teach for America
value-added assessment
Wendy Kopp
women and graduate school science and engineering
women and science
women in math and science
Woodrow Wilson High School