eduwonkette_header_515.jpg

Through the lens of social science, eduwonkette takes a serious, if sometimes irreverent, look at some of the most contentious education policy debates. (Find eduwonkette's complete archives prior to Jan. 6, 2008 here.)

« Why the Achievement Gap Matters | Main | A Brief Word on Nomenclature »

Back to (Home) School

hs4.jpg

It’s back to school! Today, more than one million schoolchildren will get up from the breakfast table, strap on a backpack, and trundle off to … the living room. Home schooling has been expanding rapidly over the course of this decade, according to data from the National Center for Education Statistics, representing approximately 2.2% of the student population in 2003. (The NCES definition of home schooling is children who are schooled at home instead of in a public or private school for at least part of their education, and whose part-time enrollment in public or private schools does not exceed 25 hours per week.) skoolboy hoped to be able to report some new evidence from the Parent and Family Involvement (PFI) module of the National Household Education Survey’s 2007 sample, but those data have not yet been released. Unfortunately, that means that the best available information is from 2003, the prior wave gathering information on the incidence of home schooling. Moreover, only 239 homeschooled children were included in the PFI module of the 2003 NHES, and thus our knowledge about their characteristics isn’t very precise.

There are a lot of misconceptions about home schooling, such as homeschooled children lack normal social graces due to isolation from peers, or they’re all very well-prepared for college. skoolboy has seen no persuasive evidence of any problems of social adjustment among homeschooled children. The reality is that most homeschooled children and youth are not isolated from others; they often participate in homeschooling networks, may participate in extracurricular activities sponsored by public and private schools, and, for a significant fraction, are part of religious communities that provide opportunities for interaction with peers and adults. Homeschooled children and youth probably have fewer opportunities to interact with other youth with differing social characteristics than do students who attend public school; but you don't need to be a homeschooler to select yourself into settings where you engage almost exclusively with other people who are like you.

It’s challenging to assess the impact of home schooling on children who are home schooled, because families self-select into home schooling, and the kinds of families that choose to home school differ, on average, from those who do not. (And don’t hold your breath waiting for the definitive randomized experiment!) Homeschooled children are more likely to be white than Black or Hispanic; to be in a household with three or more children than one with fewer children; to live in a two-parent household with one parent in the labor force than in another configuration; and to have college-educated parents.

One of the most interesting features of home schooling, from skoolboy’s view, is its implications for defining teaching as a profession. For the most part, parents who home school their children are subject to very little oversight by the state. Contrast this with the rules for licensing teachers who teach in the public schools. Although eduwonkette pooh-poohs my “1950’s” thinking about what defines a profession in the sociological sense, I think she would agree that the fact that the state will allow parents with no formal training, and who are not accountable to other teachers for what they do, to teach weakens the case for teaching as a profession.

In February, a California appeals court held that parents can be prosecuted for failing to ensure that either (a) their children attend a full-time public or private day school, or (b) their children are instructed by a tutor who holds a state credential for the child’s grade level. The case alarmed home schoolers and their supporters across the country. On appeal, that same court ruled last month that “(1) California statutes permit home schooling as a species of private school education; and (2) the statutory permission to home school may constitutionally be overridden in order to protect the safety of a child who has been declared dependent.” The court made clear that it was not taking a stand on whether or not home schooling should be allowed, and blamed the California legislature for a lack of clear legislation on the issue. What counts as a threat to the safety of a dependent child is not inscribed in the law, but physical and sexual abuse (which were alleged in the California case) surely count; skoolboy’s guess is that mediocre instruction would not. (If it did, there’d be an awful lot of usual suspects to round up!)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.edweek.org/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/4806.

Comments

Teaching a classroom and teaching your own child are two different things. I see homeschooling a lot more like tutoring. We don't license piano teachers or soccer coaches. It may make some sense for certification of classroom teachers, but I don't see any value in making parents jump through hoops, especially when homeschooling seems to be doing fairly well.

Homeschooling and teacher certification is very interesting when combined with the link discussion of grad students as a profession, and teacher unions vs grad student unions regarding student or employee status and the role of administration or faculty as supervisor.

I have often thought that if one graduated high school that ought to make them qualified to teach K-12. After all, doesn't it mean mastery in subject? While peer tutoring has been proven highly effective. But then we have proficient vs mastery. Although, some teachers might be considered only proficient in the subject they teach from cert to performance, and by no means has every teacher mastered the subjects they teach but that does not mean they do not result in passing students who have not? While highly qualified has not proven the path to proficient.

Who do teachers in a union serve? Their student clients or the parent employers? But with collective bargaining, their first supervisor is the union then administration. However, are teachers not the students to their classroom kids needs or just employees of the state? It is all a murky line for me. When the sup court says parental rights don't stop at the schoolhouse gate, I wonder why I have to make an appointment or go through a criminal background check just to observe my child in the classroom, and have a time limit on school grounds. I understand reasonable access but it all seems so adversarial in negating parental input and informed parental consent. After all, I could never tell my boss he couldn't see my work let alone watch or offer input. My work is for the greater good of my employer. Is there some cache to being a grad student vs a teacher? Is being a parent a profession?

I have the right to reproduce and raise my child till the age of 6 without state or federal mandate. But then my child must be educated, as I presumably am or more, and I am expected to accept blindly that a profession knows how to educate my child better than I do since I am expected to work for the state? While if I don't adequately provide for them, they can be removed. Schools get to visit my home and know how much money I make but we can't see their check book, let alone unfettered access to student records. How is it possible that as a parent I am responsible for a failing school I can't get into in a meaningful way outside of expected fundraising? I forgot, I'm a bad parent to begin with but there is no collective bargaining for me at the school level only punishment for Timmy. Can't we all just get along and remediate Timmy's dyslexia? I know it's in the Bible but let me see if it's in my contract...

You would think teachers answer to their students as their performance rates their own, and the kids answer to their parents? While strong home-school communication has proven an effective learning environment. But parents must address administration, not faculty, who then addresses the union. The teacher addresses the union who speaks to administration. No faculty involved as parent concerns, while they may be unique to individual schools, need to be voiced in the open for the collective powers that be to expunge any dissent. Zero tolerance. This places all the onerous on the parent vs classroom. The kids needs are left out of the legalistic and compliance-focused loop. With homeschooling, we answer to the kids and answer their questions too. There is no ambiguous supervisor, no membership, and no separate but not equal sped placement. IMO, homeschooling follows the model of higher ed. Homeschooled students are grad students in training. They lead their curriculum, discussions, labs, grading, etc. Parents as teachers are a true collaborative classroom.

Post a comment

Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please, no profanity or personal attacks. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.

The opinions expressed in eduwonkette are strictly those of the author and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Editorial Projects in Education, or any of its publications.

Get RSS

Get eduwonkette delivered by e-mail. Enter your e-mail here:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Advertisement
Powered by
Movable Type 3.34

EW Archive