Good Progress. Now What?
I continue to reflect on where Kentucky has been and where we need to go in educating our children, and I become more concerned each day. As I shared in a recent blog post, Reform 2.0--But Without Funding, Kentucky has been a leader in education reform since the 1990s, when the nation took note of the passage of the Kentucky Education Reform Act (KERA). At the time, Kentucky had nowhere to go but up with its 48th place national ranking on education indicators. The state's position has improved to 33rd, based on a collection of indicators measuring achievement, and Education Week ranked Kentucky 10th in its latest Quality Counts report. This was good progress, but making sure the improvement continues is becoming more and more of a challenge.
What made the difference for Kentucky over the years? Contributing significantly to the success were the supports that students and teachers received through the Flexible Focus Funds Program:
· Professional development which led to higher quality teaching
· Extended School Services to help students who were falling behind
· Pre-School to get kids off to strong start
· Funding for instructional materials like textbooks
· Allocations for Safe Schools
· Family Resource and Youth Service Centers to help families in need (not part of the flex focus grants but a major support)
The flexible focus funds were an investment in the future of our children, and that investment paid dividends. Because of that, it would be logical to conclude that this funding would have priority status in Kentucky's budget. The painful reality, however, is that these funds have been slowly dissolving to the point where we are risking our children's future because of the educational backsliding that will inevitably be the result. We made this point in recent testimony before a legislative committee.
In my post Enough is Enough, I wrote of the gathering clouds that will create the perfect storm of failure for our schools. Three of the most ominous clouds are:
1. The sequester resulting from federal budget cuts
2. State budget cuts
3. Fear at the local level