« Teacher of Year Laments Loss of Vocational Education | Main | On the Hill: Charter Talk Highlights Secondary Schools »

Dropouts: A Blame Game?


Plenty of finger-pointing and low expectations in a new report on teachers' and principals' views of the dropout crisis.

When asked who is chiefly responsible for students dropping out, three-quarters of teachers and principals named the students themselves, and nearly that many named parents. Fewer than 30 percent said that they or their school system, society, or elected officials bore most or all of the responsibility for students' leaving school.

Six in 10 teachers and nearly half of principals said that lack of support at home was a key reason that kids drop out; they cited that reason far more than absenteeism, hanging out with kids who aren't interested in school, being unprepared for high school, or boredom.

In fact, this report carries their very-decisive response to the voices of the dropouts themselves, captured in a widely cited 2006 study by the same organization, Civic Enterprises.

In the 2006 study, "Silent Epidemic," two-thirds of the dropouts interviewed said that they would have worked harder if more had been demanded of them. Nearly half cited boring classes as a key reason for dropping out, and seven in 10 cited lack of motivation. (See the story I wrote about that report here.)

Teachers and principals have a different view. In today's report, four in 10 teachers said they thought teenagers were making excuses for their own poor work when they say boredom is a main reason for leaving high school. Three-quarters of teachers and two-thirds of principals said they didn't think students would work harder if more were demanded of them.

The focus groups turned up some pretty pointed comments about students. A Cleveland science teacher said that "kids no longer are really excited about learning." Other teachers cited laziness and a "poor work ethic." Another said that "kids are just spoiled now by having video games and everything be so entertaining."

Everyone agreed that better preparation for high school could have made a difference. But teachers and principals (six in 10) cited that more often than the kids did (45 percent).

Teachers and principals voiced strong support for various approaches to addressing the dropout problem, with "alternate learning environments" getting the strongest support. Most also support expanding college-level learning opportunities. But barely half or less gave their support to a range of other ideas offered by those who did the study, including creating individualized graduation plans.

What do teachers and principals think will really work in turning around the dropout problem? And will their voices be heard as new policy is made during a year with such an intense focus on high schools?

A statement issued today by the American Federation of Teachers said that all educators must have "high expectations" for students‐something that was decidedly not reflected in the new report. But the union said that the "expectations gap" illustrated in the report doesn't reflect a belief that students can't learn, but rather a recognition of "the numerous barriers to achievement placed between students and educators and their goals."


As I read your post I was interested to notice that even though you presented the facts in an unbiased manner, I felt a bias against the educators. After all, who are the more sympathetic characters, the big, bad administrators and teachers or the poor, helpless, children? If someone isn’t telling the truth, one reads through the lines, it must be that the adults want to hide something or that they are afraid of hard work. Nothing could be further than the truth, no matter how tempting the argument. I have been privileged to be a boots on the ground parent volunteer in our local public schools for 14 years, helping in classrooms, attending meetings, participating in district-level committees and advisory boards, and everything in between. This has given me a fairly complete education in public education.

It's pretty apparent to me that while teaching methods and curriculum may have changed over time, the real changes have been societal. It is not politically correct, and in fact, would be the end of a politician’s career to openly say that parents are to blame.

Sure, there are many factors to look at- cultural shifts, economic changes, the media and technology, to name a few. However, if parents did their primary job, Parenting, not only would those factors be less important, they would be seen as what they really are, easy targets for politicians to blame...after all, cultural shifts can't vote. Neither the achievement gap with its concomitant problems, or the drop out rates will change until we get brave enough to assign responsibility for our children to those who ought to bear it, the parents.

-a Parent

What's interesting is that there are forward thinking educational groups that are introducing creative ways to make classroom content more exciting to students. Incorporating the latest social technology into learning is a great way to enhance the learning experience. Sadly, many educational institutions are resistant to change and do not incorporate the technology the students use in their daily life into the classroom.
A shining example of how to incorporate the latest social interaction into learning is the OLPC (One Laptop per Child)organization . There is a lesson to be learned from their experiences. They have made the learning experience collaborative with the teacher and student. They have also made the learning interesting by rethinking how children learn.

Comments are now closed for this post.


Recent Comments

  • Nick Hutchings: What's interesting is that there are forward thinking educational groups read more
  • Parent: As I read your post I was interested to notice read more




Technorati search

» Blogs that link here