« Educators at Luther Burbank Tell Their Story | Main | A Good Read: "This Strange Thing Called Prom" »

Controversy Over "Raza Studies" in Tucson


The Flypaper has decided to join Arizona Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Horne and conservative talk show hosts in condemning the teaching of Mexican-American/Raza Studies in Tucson Unified School District in Arizona. The blog points to a commentary by a teacher who taught a U.S. history course with a Mexican-American perspective as part of the Tucson program in the 2002-2003 school year. That teacher felt the curriculum was biased and "engendered racial hostility."

Liam Julian at Flypaper points out that teachers who teach the courses with a Mexican-American perspective in Tucson are invited to attend a seminar in which they work with leading scholars in the areas of "Latino critical race theory, critical race theory, critical multicultural education, Chicana/o studies, ethnic studies, cultural studies, critical pedagogy, and critical race pedagogy." He concludes: "It's incredible."

I can see how Mr. Julian's comment, "it's incredible," could refer to some of the claims made by the teacher in his commentary, such as that he was called a "sellout" by other educators when he objected to some of the content of the course. But I don't see that it's incredible, or negative in any way, that teachers would study "critical pedagogy" or "critical race theory," if those terms mean what they seem to me to mean at face value. What seems more incredible to me is that many teachers aren't encouraged to be critical of textbooks or curriculum in schools. In fact, the teacher who wrote the commentary that the Flypaper features probably practiced a bit of "critical pedagogy" to come up with his views of the course, which is a good thing.

An article that ran in The Arizona Star in late May seems to me to provide a balanced picture of the intense feelings swirling around the debate over whether a Mexican-American perspective should be taught—and if so, how should it be taught—in a school system with lots of students of Mexican heritage.

July 2 Update: The National Review Online published a commentary today by Liam Julian, subtitled "Grievance and Distortion 101" on Raza studies.


The last ESL training I attended felt like a LULAC rally. La Raza and Che Guevara t-shirts were in abundance.
Public education must be for the building up of our society. While informed dissent is important, higher education puts too much emphasis on race and gender politics and not enough on what it takes to build community and national unity.

One of "Raza Studies" books they use is called "Occupied America" by Rodolfo Acuna, 5th edition. At pg. 323 they quote one of their leaders, "Kill the gringo". They whitewash it and say he really just meant he didn't want whites controlling Mexicans but his actual statement was, "If the worst comes to the worst, we must eliminate the gringo which means we must kill him." At pg. 167 there is another quote, this time of one of their many Plans to send Americans of European descent back to Europe and murder any that do not go willingly. This particular Plan they refer to is the Plan of San Diego. Here is the book's quote, "The supporters would execute all white males over age 16..." The entire book distrorts American history making the U.S. look like a terrible monster and the Mexicans are always poor victims. They tell their mexican descent children to vote for their own and not vote for whitey because it would dilute them! This book is filled with "hate", "racism" and "insurrection" (revolution). It should be banned and so should the entire course of study. Since when do we teach hatred and revolution in our schools! And many of their other books are just as bad.

Comments are now closed for this post.

Follow This Blog


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments