« Sparks Fly Over Education of ELLs in the Big Apple | Main | How Can Stimulus Funds Be Used for ELLs? Let's Count the Ways »

In Schools With Few ELLs, ESL Placement Has Negative Effect

In schools with a small number of English-language learners, first-generation immigrant students do better academically if they aren't placed in English-as-a-second-language classes, according to a study published in the March issue of Educational Policy. Their counterparts in mainstream classes without ESL do better academically than students who are put in ESL classes; this finding is true only in schools with a low number of ELLs.

The study's authors say they do not interpret the finding to mean that English-language learners do not need special support services. Rather, they argue that those services available in schools with few immigrant students appear now to be insufficient for giving the English-language learners parity with mainstreamed English-language learners. They note that it appears the students in ESL classes aren't getting access to the school's core academic curriculum.

And the study, "ESL Placement and Schools: Effects on Immigrant Achievement," has another interesting finding: ESL placement is beneficial at schools with a large number of English-language learners. ESL classes have a strong positive effect on academic achievement for second-generation immigrants compared with their counterparts who are mainstreamed in those schools. But the positive effect of ESL placement, in this case, isn't significant for the first-generation immigrant students.

What's particularly interesting about the study is that the researchers look at the academic achievement of the first and second generations of immigrant students separately. I learned recently when reporting on what researchers call the "immigrant paradox," that there are more studies out there looking at different generations than I thought, but most studies of ELLs seem to lump the different generations together.

It's also interesting that the researchers didn't use students' test scores as measures of academic achievement, which is very common. Instead, they looked at enrollment in math and science courses, enrollment in college-preparatory courses in general, junior-year grade point average, and the rate of course failure.

They studied a sample of 1,169 students attending six schools with a large number of ELLs and 514 who attended 20 schools with few ELLs. The researchers are from the University of Georgia, University of Texas at Austin, and Pennsylvania State University.

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Follow This Blog


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments

  • Charles: ELLs in our state ARE required to take State standardized read more
  • Melissa: Maybe I'm just becoming jaded, but this feels to me read more
  • Anonymous: Are you kidding me....UNO is an organizaion that literally destroys read more
  • Meg Baker: Are any schools using ACCESS scores for purposes other than read more
  • Dr. Mendoza: This is great news i must say. Hopefully this DREAM read more