« How Can the Medical Field Tap Into the Heritage Languages of Doctors? | Main | ELL-Friendly Charter Schools in Philadelphia »

U.S. Supreme Court Hears Horne v. Flores

In today's oral arguments in Horne v. Flores, the long-running ELL case in Arizona, U.S. Supreme Court justices questioned what is sufficient academic progress for ELLs.

Justice Antonin Scalia at one point asked: "Do you really think you haven't complied with adequate funding of ELL programs until you raise all of the ELL students up to the level of native-English speakers?" (Link to transcript is here.)

It sounds a lot like a question that a lot of educators ask about the No Child Left Behind Act. Is it appropriate for the federal education law to require ELLs to meet the same standards as native-English speakers?

See the School Law Blog for my colleague Mark Walsh's report on today's arguments. Our Web site also has a story that I wrote about the arguments.

Update: The Associated Press filed a story on the oral arguments as well. NPR also covered the case.

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Follow This Blog


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments