« House Passes DREAM Act; Senate Vote Expected | Main | How Do Supreme Court Justices Refer to the Undocumented? »

Senate Postpones Consideration of DREAM Act

The U.S. Senate postponed its expected vote on the DREAM Act today in an effort by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to keep the issue alive.

"We've been told by our Republican colleagues that they aren't willing to do business," Reid said before making a motion to table a cloture vote on the Senate version of the bill, which had been scheduled for this morning. In other words, Reid didn't believe that he had enough votes from senators to move the Senate version of the DREAM Act forward.

Senators voted 59-40 on Reid's motion to table, giving the chamber the opportunity to hold a later vote on the DREAM Act, which is designed to provide a path to legalization for some undocumented youths who graduate from U.S. high schools.

Observers predict that Reid, D-Nev., will attempt to have the Senate vote on the House version of the DREAM Act, which was approved with a 216-198 vote last night. The House version of the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Act, or DREAM Act, would provide a path to legalization for undocumented high school graduates who meet certain criteria and complete two years of college or military service. To be eligible, the graduates would have to have arrived in the United States before age 16 and be no older than 30. They also would have to have lived in this country for five continuous years and have no criminal record.

Shortly before the procedural vote was scheduled to occur, U.S. Sen. David Vitter, R-La., spoke on the Senate floor and urged lawmakers to "listen to the American people" and block the DREAM Act from moving forward.

"The American people have been speaking loud and clear on issues that pertain to the DREAM Act," Vitter said. He argued that if the DREAM Act becomes law, undocumented students who benefit from it would be vying for slots at colleges and universities and for financial aid with U.S. citizens. "These young illegals who would be granted amnesty would be put in competition with American citizens for those scarce resources," he said. He also argued the act would be costly and further run up the federal debt, an argument that supporters of the bill refute.

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Follow This Blog


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments

  • Charles: ELLs in our state ARE required to take State standardized read more
  • Melissa: Maybe I'm just becoming jaded, but this feels to me read more
  • Anonymous: Are you kidding me....UNO is an organizaion that literally destroys read more
  • Meg Baker: Are any schools using ACCESS scores for purposes other than read more
  • Dr. Mendoza: This is great news i must say. Hopefully this DREAM read more