« Jeb Bush to GOP: Stop 'Acting Stupid' With Hispanic Voters | Main | ELL and Spec. Ed. Advisors Named for Common Assessment Group »

Long-Term ELLs Poised for More Attention in California

Long-term English-learners—those students who still haven't reached fluency after several years in U.S. schools—could become much more visible in California, where just about 1 out of every 4 public school students is an ELL.

That's because legislation that would create a separate student category for long-term ELLs for reporting purposes is sitting on the desk of Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown, awaiting his signature. If he signs the measure, California would become the first state in the nation to break out data for long-term ELLs and report it publicly. The measure would also require the state education agency to break out data on students who are "at-risk" for becoming long-term English learners.

For years, a number of researchers, advocates and educators have argued that lumping all English-learners into a single category masks how well, or how poorly, this very diverse population of kids is actually doing in school. Outcomes for long-term English-learners have been especially hidden.

Under the measure that received fairly broad support in the politically fractious California statehouse, long-term English-language learners are defined as students who are in grades 6 to 12, have been enrolled in U.S. schools for more than six years, have been stuck at the same level of English for two or more years as measured by the state's annual proficiency exam, and scores "far below basic" or "below basic" on California's exam in English/language arts. There currently is no common definition of a long-term ELL in California, where districts vary in how they identify such students.

Students who would be defined as "at-risk" for becoming long-term ELLs are those who are in grades 5 through 11, have been enrolled in U.S. schools for more than four years, score at the intermediate level or below on the state's English proficiency exam, and scores in one of the two bottom categories on the state's English/language arts exam.

As originally conceived, the legislation would have also required school districts to notify parents whose children were flagged as "at-risk" for long-term ELL status or who had already fallen into the long-term ELL category. That requirement was stripped out as the bill moved through the legislative process.

Californians Together, a research and advocacy group for the state's 1.6 million English-learners, is the brain trust behind this bill and catapulted the long-term ELL issue into the national spotlight a few years ago with its report showing that large numbers of such students were languishing in California's public schools.

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Follow This Blog


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments

  • Charles: ELLs in our state ARE required to take State standardized read more
  • Melissa: Maybe I'm just becoming jaded, but this feels to me read more
  • Anonymous: Are you kidding me....UNO is an organizaion that literally destroys read more
  • Meg Baker: Are any schools using ACCESS scores for purposes other than read more
  • Dr. Mendoza: This is great news i must say. Hopefully this DREAM read more