« Tentative Deal Reached on Native-Language Testing Requirement for ELLs | Main | Report: Unaccompanied Minors Blocked From Enrolling in School in 14 States »

Ron Unz, Architect of California's Proposition 227, Running for U.S. Senate

Ronald Unz, the man behind California's long-standing restrictions on bilingual education, is running for U.S. Senate in the Golden State.

But he's aiming for defeat, not victory.

Unz, a Republican, acknowledges that he's a longshot in the crowded race to replace retiring Democratic U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer.

The businessman and political activist is running for the Senate to raise awareness about, and hopefully mount opposition to, a November ballot proposal that would largely overturn Proposition 227, the 1998 initiative that nearly dismantled bilingual education in California.

Ushered in with voter approval, the statute restricted the availability of bilingual education for English-learner students in favor of English-only immersion programs. California voters will have a chance to repeal the law in November.

On his personal blog, Unz wrote that running for statewide office was his best option to rally support to keep it intact.

"After considering various options, I decided that becoming a statewide candidate myself was the probably the best means of effectively focusing public attention on this repeal effort and defeating it," he wrote.

The "legislative ballot measure up for a vote this November aims to undo all that progress and re-establish the disastrously unsuccessful system of Spanish-almost-only 'bilingual education' in California public schools," Unz wrote on his blog.

But much has changed since Unz sponsored and financed the "English in Public Schools" campaign.

Enthusiasm and demand for multilingualism has grown nationally and in California, which educates about 1.5 million English-learners. The state is also the birthplace of the seal of biliteracy, a national movement to recognize and honor high school graduates who demonstrate fluency in two or more languages.

In California and elsewhere, researchers have touted the benefits of bilingual education for English-learners and native-English speakers alike.

Test results have also shown that states, such as California, where voters decided to replace bilingual education with structured English immersion as the default method for teaching ELLs, have produced less-than-stellar results.

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Follow This Blog


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments

  • Charles: ELLs in our state ARE required to take State standardized read more
  • Melissa: Maybe I'm just becoming jaded, but this feels to me read more
  • Anonymous: Are you kidding me....UNO is an organizaion that literally destroys read more
  • Meg Baker: Are any schools using ACCESS scores for purposes other than read more
  • Dr. Mendoza: This is great news i must say. Hopefully this DREAM read more