March 2007 Archives

March 30, 2007

Separated By Race

The March 30 PEN Weekly NewsBlast points to
a story in the Contra Costa Times
in California that makes you ask: What was the principal thinking?

The principal of Mount Diablo High School in Concord, Calif., apparently organized separate assemblies for students of different races in an effort to pump up their motivation to perform better on upcoming state exams. According to the story, jazz music and images of Martin Luther King greeted African-American students, flags from foreign countries greeted Asian students, and Latinos and whites had separate events.

The principal said the race-based assemblies were held to prevent one racial group from teasing another one based on test results.

Still, some experts suggested the segregated assemblies might actually have been illegal.

Reporting test scores by race and ethnicity is one thing, but actually physically separating students based on race as a motivational ploy seems, at least from this vantage point, ridiculous and insulting.

March 28, 2007

The Downside of Multitasking

Multitasking zealots will probably take issue with a recent piece in the New York Times about the drawbacks of turning your mind into a hypertext highway.

But for those of you who enjoy digging deeply into an idea or problem without constant interruptions, this piece is worth reading. It raises concerns about multitasking that have implications for student learning and, in turn, motivation.

And there is a nice little nod by a researcher quoted in the article to the intellectual powers of us older folks. Check it out.


March 27, 2007

Teacher Experiences vs. Administrator Perspectives

There are some interesting little factoids about student motivation in a recent National School Boards Association report, "Where We Teach," which examines a number of issues related to school climate in urban schools.

The report, for instance, found that almost twice as many teachers as administrators surveyed (29 percent vs. 16 percent) said children at their schools are not motivated to learn, suggesting there might be a disconnnect (surprise, surprise) between teacher experiences and administrator perspectives.

March 23, 2007

Studying Math Motivation

One of the responsibilities of this blog is to troll for interesting or useful research articles about student motivation.

This morning, I found one while trolling on the American Educational Research Association site. Titled "Students' Motivation for Standardized Math Exams," the article examines how individual differences in motivation and psychological processing affect performance on high-stakes math assessments. It evaluates how factors such as achievement goals, self-concept, and test anxiety are related to student performance.

Among other interesting information, the piece includes excerpts from interviews with 8th graders about high-stakes math tests. "Usually tests make me nervous," says one student. "Kind of anxious like I had to hurry and then when I hurry I might not get the right answer. Like I'm worried about making the time or falling behind the other kids or something ... if they're all done before me, I feel like I am not doing it correctly."

What impact do you think high-stakes assessments have on motivation or performance?

March 19, 2007

Catch 22: Love of Learning vs. Getting the Grade

Guest contributor Ann Bradley, an assistant managing editor here at Education Week, often talks about the trials and tribulations of motivating her children to do well in school. This past weekend, she witnessed the poignancy of what really motivates kids.

Here's Ann's story:

"My 12-year-old son spent the weekend working on a project for his 7th grade Spanish class. They're studying the names of school-related items, like staplers and pencils, and they have to make a locker and fill it with 10 things, all correctly labeled. They also have to write numerous sentences explaining what is in the locker and what class it's used for.

My son, who desperately wants to do well in school but is still learning that effort equals outcome, was thrilled to get this creative assignment and determined to do his best. He spent hours turning a Nike box into a miniature locker. He spray-painted it blue, made a lock out of tin foil, and filled it with a tiny bulletin board (made by ripping a corner off the one in his room) complete with a tiny note written in Spanish stuck on with a pushpin. He even got our 5-year-old in on the act, who lent him a tiny SpongeBob backpack to hang in the locker.

At one point, he said to me, "Mom, this is so good, it looks like a girl did it!"

I guess that means only girls fuss over their schoolwork, while cool guys pretend that they have more important things, like lacrosse and whether to buzz their heads, to think about!

When I checked the assignment rubric for the project, my heart sank. Turns out the actual locker is worth only 10 points, and the rest of the 70 points will be earned with clear and complete sentences that use the right verb, etc.

Being a Type A Mom, of course, I couldn't help but point out to my son that all of his labors would only yield 10 points, and that he'd better get cracking on his sentences. It was awful to have to "shut down" his creative energies that way, although I do understand that this is a language class, not an art class.

But still, the whole experience left me feeling sad that my son, who attends one of the finest middle schools in the nation, has so few assignments that jazz him up the way the locker has. He was so motivated to make it, and the assignment gave him the opportunity to exercise a little-used part of himself--even at the risk of producing something that a girl could have done."

Does this story sound familiar? What lessons do think this offers about what motivates kids?

March 15, 2007

Chatting About Global Competition

The transcripts of chats on edweek.org are a treasure-trove of practical tips, well-informed insights, and strong opinions.

So if you missed the last chat, "Tough Choices: Preparing Students for Global Competition," check it out. Our featured guests were former Boston schools superintendent Thomas W. Payzant and Marc S. Tucker of the National Center on Education and the Economy.

This transcript is worth reading because it raises some important questions related to student motivation.

At one point in the discussion, Payzant wonders if our country has the will to improve its education system. He recalls a recent trip to China:

"Last year, I was in China for a week and visited schools. I asked what are the most important subjects - the answer was Chinese, English, Mathematics and Science. And then I was told about the other subjects that were important too, including the arts, physical education, etc. This can not all be done in a six hour day, 175 or 180 day school year. Are we prepared to make the commitment to more time and higher quality?"

And, equally important, how would more time in school affect the level of motivation of students? Would they grow even more bored? Or would the extra time be just what educators need to teach more creatively?

March 13, 2007

Later Wake-Up Call in Boston

The Boston public schools have decided to let students from 10 high schools sleep a little later Monday through Friday, according to All About BPS, a district-sponsored blog written by the schools' chief communications officer.

Educators, policymakers, and researchers should keep a close eye on these experiments in letting high school kids sleep a little longer, especially if they result in higher levels of achievement. There is already some research available on the effect of school start times on student performance.

Undoubtedly, I would have been a strong advocate for the validity of this research when I was in high school. An extra 20 or 30 minutes of sleep in the morning was something worth fighting for back then.

March 09, 2007

A Quiz for "Helicopter" Parents

Thanks to the PEN Weekly NewsBlast for pointing us to a part of the College Board's Web site that asks the question: Are you a helicopter parent?

The College Board then offers up an interactive quiz to evaluate if you fall into this category of parenting. The quiz is geared toward parents of high school students who are looking at colleges, so I'll have to wait a few more years before I can take it. But if your children are juniors or seniors in high school, you should take the quiz--even if it might tell you something about yourself you might not want to know. (Educators might have fun pretending they are a certain type of parent and then taking the quiz. You all know these types of parents, right?)

This issue of helicopter parents--those adults who are hyper-involved in virtually everything their children do--has been getting quite a bit of play in the media over the past year or so. A commentary in Sunday's Washington Post, "Helicopter Parenting: Spiraling Out of Control," presented a particularly interesting, and humorous, perspective on this issue.

I, for one, believe this type of parenting can have a negative effect on student motivation in the long run. It prevents students from learning how to take initiative, protects them too much from learning lessons from failures, and leads to insanely overscheduled lives for kids and parents.

That's why I found it a bit amusing that on the College Board's "helicopter parenting" page, there is a link to an article titled "Motivating the Unmotivated Student." Maybe it's just me, but I think so-called helicopter parents are likely to walk away with the wrong message from that article even if it offers some thoughtful suggestions.

March 06, 2007

How Bored Are Your Students?

An Indiana University study released last week (sorry for the late notice) suggests that 2 of every 3 high school students are bored in at least one class every day, and 17 percent say they suffer daily boredom in every class.

The top two reasons they cite for their boredom are they do not find the material they are studying interesting or they feel it isn't relevant to their lives.

What's going on here? Are these kids a bunch of lazy, disengaged whiners? Or do schools need to to a better job making learning interesting and relevant?

March 05, 2007

"Mouthwatering Motivation"

Should pizza be used to motivate students to read more?

An Associated Press story about Pizza Hut's Book It program, which rewards young readers with free pizzas based on the number of books they read, says critics of the program are concerned that it contributes to poor eating habits and encourages kids to read lots of easy books, rather than fewer, more difficult ones.

Company officials claim that Book It is the nation's largest reading motivation program, reaching roughly 50,000 schools across the country, and turning many non-readers into readers. They also discount the idea that Book It is somehow contributing to the nation's childhood obesity problem.

It does seem that a couple of free pizzas is unlikely make a kid fat. So it's hard for me to buy that argument even if the program's use of the phrase "Mouthwatering Motivation" on its Web site seems to send the wrong message.

However, having watched my sons participate in this program, I can say that it did encourage them to read lots of short, easy books rather than longer, more difficult ones. My boys deliberately looked for as many easy books as they could find and plowed through them as quickly as they could. Not exactly the best approach for building smart, analytical readers.

But if pizza (extrinsic motivator) sparks a love of reading (intrinsic motivator), that would be a good thing, right?

What do you think? Is this an appropriate and effective way to motivate kids to read?

March 02, 2007

Failure is Relative

From the T.F.A. Trenches has a recent entry that touches on the life lessons about resiliency that can be learned by struggling to master basic mathematical concepts. In this case, maybe a failing grade is still a step in the right direction. Nice little story. Check it out.

March 01, 2007

Multitasking Gone Mad?

My job requires quite a bit of multitasking. So I understand that the ability to juggle many tasks is a valuable skill in today's economy.

But watching the way some teenagers do their homework, or just how they interact with adults and each other, makes me wonder if all this multitasking (though necessary in the workplace) has a dark underside, a devolution of their thinking skills that position them well to know a little about a lot, but not much in any great depth.

Will we soon be living in the land of superficial thinkers? Or will multitasking evolve to suit more in-depth thinking?

I was pleased to see that the Washington Post tackled this issue in a front page story this week titled "Teens Can Multitask, But What Are Costs?" In the story, cognitive researchers say the jury is still out on the effects of multitasking on the development of the teenage mind. But some of the researchers interviewed for the story expressed significant concerns.

Educators should keep a close watch on this research, because it could have implications for teaching and learning.

Advertisement

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Reward Incentive Programs: Awesome!!! Nice write-up. In this present scenario of economic downturn read more
  • milan hotels: I believe that all schools should adapt to the citizen read more
  • best life coaching: I also disagree because motivation is needed everywhere and in read more
  • find a life coach: This is a good way of promoting arts and education read more
  • www.instituteforcoaching.com: citizen school is best schools for all over they motivation read more

Most Viewed
On Education Week