« Parents at Los Angeles Elementary School to Vote on Charter Proposal | Main | Education Leaders Weigh In On Parent Engagement, Privacy Issues »

Conn. Bill Would Assure Parents Leave for School Activities

| No comments

A Connecticut bill that would allow parents to take up to 20 hours of parental leave from their employers to attend their children's school-related activities is under consideration. It was sent to the House Committee on Appropriations on April 3.

Testimony on HB 6501, "An Act Concerning Parental Engagement," was heard before the legislature's Committee on Children last month, with organizations representing parents and educators supporting it, and at least one business and industry association arguing against it.

The bill covers parents, guardians, or grandparents who have custody of a school-age child, and it addresses "qualified" school-related activities, which include parent-teacher conferences, back-to-school nights, and school board meetings. The bill, which was introduced by Committee on Children, would require an annual allotment of 20 hours leave.

"This [proposed law] could be used so that a parent could take time off to chaperone a field trip or attend an event happening at the school during daytime hours," said Marne Usher, Connecticut Parent Teacher Student Association vice president of government relations in a phone interview. It is not necessary that the leave be paid leave, she explained.

Usher spoke before the children's committee on March 5, saying that schools would need to spend another $1,000 more per pupil to get the same gains in student achievement that an involved parent brings.

Eric Gjede, assistant counsel at the Connecticut Business and Industry Association (CBIA), weighed in against the proposal. According to a blog from the Hartford Courant, Gjede said the bill "disregards the staffing needs of employers and conflicts with their policies for requesting and approving time off that were implemented to provide fairness amongst all employees."

The Connecticut bill mirrors one introduced last year in Maryland. That bill, HB 567 in the 2012 General Session of the Maryland legislature, was dropped after receiving an unfavorable report by the Economic Matters committee.

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments