« ED's 'All Hat, No Cattle' Stance on the Unions | Main | New Hill Republicans Will Be Mixed on Federal Support for Charters »

The UFT Could've Taught Bernie Madoff a Thing or Two

In my experience, few topics are more assured to provoke yawns (oh, and the ire of NEA and AFT officials) than talk of teacher benefits and underfunded pensions. But they matter. Big time. Mostly because benefits consume scarce dollars that would otherwise go to schools, students, and classrooms. But they also matter because the deals required to address such unaffordable benefits get really bizarre. Take the deal on guaranteed tax-deferred returns that New York City and the UFT struck last year.

In addition to their generous pension, New York City teachers are also eligible for a voluntary tax-deferred annuity retirement program. That plan for many years guaranteed teachers at least an 8.25% rate of return on investments, with the city committed to fully honoring the rate if the market didn't deliver. For readers who don't spend a lot of time following the markets, that's a ridiculously expensive guarantee. Hell, Ponzi schemer Bernie Madoff went to jail because he made promises like that and then couldn't deliver. Moreover, the S&P 500 Index, for instance, has actually lost value on an annualized basis over the past decade. Thus, the tax-deferred guarantee program costs New York City precious dollars that could otherwise have gone into schools and classrooms. The major difference from Madoff's scheme is that the UFT can always count on NYC to raid the schools in order to make good on its unaffordable promises.

Last year
, to partially unwind that promise (and to win a UFT agreement to dial the guaranteed return back from 8.25 to "just" 7% in the midst of a brutal, job-killing recession), the UFT insisted that New York City shorten the teacher work year by two days. UFT-represented employees who had been required to report to work and start preparing for the school year on the Thursday before Labor Day would henceforth report instead on the Tuesday after Labor Day. The UFT resolution bragged of "winning back" the two days.

This is how extravagant benefit promises cannibalize schooling. We're going to see those promises pushing hard on school spending as states struggle with tight budgets and underfunded pensions. It'll be fascinating to see if the NEA and AFT leaders so eager to declare that they're just fighting "for the kids" will continue to press for "victories" that reduce instructional time, teacher preparation days, and school budgets as the price for trimming their supersized, industrial-era benefits.

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

The opinions expressed in Rick Hess Straight Up are strictly those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Editorial Projects in Education, or any of its publications.

Follow This Blog


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments