Today, I want to run through the RHSU Edu-Scholar scoring rubric.
Today, I want to take a few moments to explain the purpose of the RHSU Edu-Scholar ratings.
Just a head's up that next week we'll be running the 2013 RHSU Edu-Scholar Rankings. The exercise is intended to counter the academy's unfortunate tendency to discount scholarly contributions that inform the broader public understanding and influence education policy debates. The Edu-Scholar Rankings are designed to recognize university-based scholars, of any discipline or bent, for their contributions to the public square. Edu-scholar impact is understood to encompass both the corpus of one's scholarly work (a scholar's widely-cited works, books, etc.) and one's centrality to public discussion in 2012 (appearances in newspaper reporting, online media, and so forth). After all, a ...
Here's a guess at some of the key edu-headlines we'll be reading in 2013.
With an eye towards reader traffic, Twitter interest, and our own judgment, we've tagged ten of RHSU's highlights from 2012.
I believe we need to insist that it's unacceptable for anyone, whatever their views, to exploit the murder of children when debating unions, testing, and such.
Here are some edu-journal articles that I was especially eager to read over the Christmas holiday.
Students will be well-served if educators, parents, and policymakers recognize that public systems, nonprofits, and for-profits all have vital roles to play.
I'd like all of us, before we write, opine, or declaim, to take care that we accord the lost children of Newtown the dignity they deserve.
I don't care about aggregate satisfaction; I want to know the satisfaction of terrific, hard-working teachers and employees who are making a difference for kids.