« Federal School Meals May Contribute to Rural Child Obesity, Report Says | Main | School Administrators More Likely to Leave Rural Districts, Report Says »

How the Obama Administration Has Affected Rural Schools

Some policies championed under the Obama administration have helped rural schools, but many programs and resources still elude the rural communities that need help the most, according to a recent story by The Hechinger Report. 

The story highlights Dillon County in South Carolina, which President Barack Obama visited in 2007 when he first ran for president. The rural community has benefited from Obama's attention. It received a $3 million development grant and a low-interest loan from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. With those funds, the district was able to improve decrepit athletic fields and build a new middle school. 

According to the article, other rural districts have benefited from certain programs supported by Obama during his two terms. The Rural Education Achievement Program escaped funding cuts, and the E-rate program, which helps schools upgrade technology and internet connections, has grown.

At the same time, some policies and programs have been difficult for rural schools to participate in, such as those that require lengthy and time-consuming grant applications.

Noelle Ellerson, the associate executive director for policy and advocacy at the AASA, the School Superintendents Association, told The Hechinger Report the administration's use of competitive-grant programs has been especially difficult for rural schools that need additional education funds. "That has negatively and disproportionately hit rural schools [that] were least positioned and had the least capacity to pursue competitive grants," Ellerson said.

Among other ways rural schools have been affected by federal funds and policy decisions over the past few years are:

  • Rural turnaround schools have faced unique challenges, and few rural schools participating in the federal School Improvement Grant program have fully implemented the "transformation" model. Unlike other school improvement models, the transformation model does not require a turnover of staff members. The principal is replaced and extensive instructional reform and professional development occurs. 
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments