« Does the Administration think Early Childhood Doesn't Matter for Economic Growth? | Main | Teachers as Owners »

The Elizabeth Bennet of Education Reform

Earlier this week I wrote about the role of narrative in education reform policy debates. It's clear that the education reform narratives of the past decade have trafficked heavily in bold and colorful characters. Individuals and groups on both sides of the debate have cast themselves as scrappy Davids going up against powerful and wealthy Goliaths. We hear romanticized tales of educators--charter school founders, social entrepreneurs, principals and superintendents--who pursue their dreams with the singular and idiosyncratic vision of Don Quixote.

Amid this plethora of bold and compelling characters, charter school authorizers seem incredibly boring. Authorizers are sort of like the heroine in a Jane Austen novel; they have a very limited range of tools and tactics at their disposal to achieve their goals. Their most powerful tool is the ability to say "yes" or "no" to potential suitors (though unlike an Austen heroine the have the fortunate ability to revoke a "yes" when the suitor proves disappointing). To be sure, they can deploy their feminine wiles to try to attract high-quality applicants--as more major authorizers are doing. And the best authorizers also keep a close eye on the performance of their schools and act when they fall short of standards. But a lot of the role is waiting, and watching, and responding. That's not exactly the sexiest job description in an education reform narrative that valorizes bold action and "no excuses" pursuit if goals. But, just as you'd have a big gap in your cultural literacy if you'd never heard of Pride and Prejudice or Sense and Sensibility, the education reform policy narrative has a gap if it ignores the important role that authorizers play in creating a climate that fosters quality charter schools.

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

The opinions expressed in Sara Mead's Policy Notebook are strictly those of the author and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Editorial Projects in Education, or any of its publications.
Advertisement

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Technorati

Technorati search

» Blogs that link here

Tags

AFT
Alex Grodd
Ana Menezes
Andrew Kelly
appropriations
ARRA
Aspire Public Schools
authorizing
Better Lesson
Bill Ferguson
certification
charter schools
child care
children's literature
choice
civil rights
CLASS
Core Knowledge
curriculum
D.C.
democracy
early childhood
Early Learning Challenge Grant
economics
elections
English language learners
entrepreneurship
equity
Evan Stone
fathers
finance
fix poverty first
Hailly Korman
harlem children's zone
HEA
Head Start
head start
health care
Higher Education
home-based child care
homeschooling
housing
How we think and talk about pre-k evidence
i3
IDEA
income inequality
instruction
international
Jason Chaffetz
Jen Medbery
just for fun
Justin Cohen
Kaya Henderson
Kenya
kindergarten
KIPP
Kirabo Jackson
Kwame Brown
land use
LearnBoost
libertarians
LIFO
literacy
Los Angeles
Louise Stoney
Mark Zuckerberg
Maryland
Massachusetts
Memphis
Michelle Rhee
Michigan
Mickey Muldoon
Neerav Kingsland
New Jersey
New Orleans
NewtownReaction
Next Gen Leaders
Next Gen leaders
nonsense
NSVF Summit
NYT
organizing
parent engagement
parenting
parking
pell grants
politics
poverty
PreK-3rd
presidents
principals
productivity
QRIS
Race to the Top
Rafael Corrales
redshirting
regulation
religion
rick hess
Roxanna Elden
RTT
san francisco
school choice
social services
SOTU
special education
Stephanie Wilson
stimulus
story
Sydney Morris
tax credits
Teacher Prep
teachers
technology
Title I
unions
urban issues
Vincent Gray
vouchers
Waiting for Superman
Washington
West Virginia
zoning