« The Problem with "Brain-Based" Education | Main | Early Head Start Expansion: A Suggestion for OHS »

Omnibus and Early Childhood

As numerous media outlets are reporting, early childhood education, and particularly Head Start, are looking like winners in the ombnibus appropriations agreement reached by Congressional negotiators last night. A quick summary of what you know: 

Head Start: The Omnibus would provide nearly $8.6 billion in funding for Head Start, which would not only restore funds cut from Head Start agencies by sequestration, but increase them by about $612 million above the pre-sequestration level. How will funds be used? Of the nearly $8.6 billion in funds, nearly $8.1 will be allocated through the existing Head Start formula (primarily for grants to existing grantees); $500 million will be used to support expansion of Head Start services for infants and toddlers; and $25 million will be available to the secretary to for supplementary allocations related to implementation of the Head Start Designation Renewal SystemRestoring funding for current grantees: The bill also tweaks language in the Head Start funding formula to ensure that current Head Start grantees will have funds lost to sequester restored: Under existing Head Start act language, each Head Start grantee's "base grant" is based on the funding it received in the "prior fiscal year." The omnibus language changes this to base each grantee's allocation on what it received in fiscal year 2012--ensuring that base grants for each agency in 2014 will be based on pre-, rather than post-sesqester funding levels. Of funds going to Head Start grantees, $100 million will be available to provide a cost of living adjustment for Head Start staff.

Race to the Top: The Omnibus would allocate $250 million for a new Race to the Top competition in FY 2014, all of which must be used to make competitive awards to states for improving early care and education services. The bill requires the administration to use the funds for an early childhood competition, but also permits them to focus the funds on a pre-k expansion competition (in contrast to the original RTT-Early Learning Challenge, which focused on 0-5 systems building). The bill also specifies that states that win these competitive grants may use them to make subgrants to school districts or early childhood providers to expand preschool services. Essentially, this bill authorizes a very mini version of the Obama administration's pre-k proposal, as a competitive grant to states--so it's a win for Obama on pre-k. But $250 million doesn't go very far in supporting expanded pre-k access, so getting real impact out of this money will require creative policy thinking. It will be very interesting to see what kind of requirements and priorities the Department of Education puts forward for the program later this year.   

Child Care: Although it's gotten less attention than the Head Start and Race to the Top provisions, the Omnibus also includes an increase in federal funding for childcare subsidies to low-income parents, to $2.36 billion.

Overall, Head Start is the clear winner on early childhood funding in this bill, and the administration is going to get to declare a modest victory on its pre-k proposal, too. Three observations on this: 1) These increases suggest that the Head Start impact study hasn't significantly undermined support in Congress for Head Start funding. 2) The success in restoring and securing increases in Head Start funding likely has something to do with the intensive media coverage of sequester-related cuts in Head Start services, which were among the most visible, local, and sympathetic victims of the sequester, and the presence of Head Start grantees in every Congressional district. 3) Of all the potential avenues for increasing early childhood funding, increasing Head Start funds appears to be the one that Congress is most open to at the moment--underscoring the importance of focusing on Head Start quality and effectiveness as a critical complement to any efforts to expand pre-k access.   

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Advertisement

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Technorati

Technorati search

» Blogs that link here

Tags

AFT
Alex Grodd
Ana Menezes
Andrew Kelly
appropriations
ARRA
Aspire Public Schools
authorizing
Better Lesson
Bill Ferguson
certification
charter schools
child care
children's literature
choice
civil rights
CLASS
Core Knowledge
curriculum
D.C.
democracy
early childhood
Early Learning Challenge Grant
economics
elections
English language learners
entrepreneurship
equity
Evan Stone
fathers
finance
fix poverty first
Hailly Korman
harlem children's zone
HEA
Head Start
head start
health care
Higher Education
home-based child care
homeschooling
housing
How we think and talk about pre-k evidence
i3
IDEA
income inequality
instruction
international
Jason Chaffetz
Jen Medbery
just for fun
Justin Cohen
Kaya Henderson
Kenya
kindergarten
KIPP
Kirabo Jackson
Kwame Brown
land use
LearnBoost
libertarians
LIFO
literacy
Los Angeles
Louise Stoney
Mark Zuckerberg
Maryland
Massachusetts
Memphis
Michelle Rhee
Michigan
Mickey Muldoon
Neerav Kingsland
New Jersey
New Orleans
NewtownReaction
Next Gen leaders
Next Gen Leaders
nonsense
NSVF Summit
NYT
organizing
parent engagement
parenting
parking
pell grants
politics
poverty
PreK-3rd
presidents
principals
productivity
QRIS
Race to the Top
Rafael Corrales
redshirting
regulation
religion
rick hess
Roxanna Elden
RTT
san francisco
school choice
social services
SOTU
special education
Stephanie Wilson
stimulus
story
Sydney Morris
tax credits
Teacher Prep
teachers
technology
Title I
unions
urban issues
Vincent Gray
vouchers
Waiting for Superman
Washington
West Virginia
zoning