« Family and Medical Leave Act Suit Against School District Is Revived | Main | Education in the 2008-09 U.S. Supreme Court Term »

No Education Cases on Supreme Court's Grant List Today

| 4 Comments

The U.S. Supreme Court issued an orders list today adding 10 new cases for its 2008-09 term, but it did not grant review of any of the dozen or so education cases that were on its agenda.

The court typically meets in the week before the formal opening of its new term, which is next Monday, Oct. 6, to review the hundreds of appeals that have piled up over the summer. Among the school issues arising in those cases are student free speech, the burden of proof in special education proceedings, parents' objections to school lessons on gay tolerance, and teachers' access to school mailboxes for communicating with other teachers.

Let me stress that the justices did not deny review in any of these education cases today. The early "grant" list from the last week of September typically only announces cases the court is adding to its docket. A big orders list will come out on Monday, and most of the appeals that were not granted today will probably be denied review.


One other piece of business the court took care of today involved its decision last June striking down the death penalty in cases of child rape. I blogged then about how the ruling in Kennedy v. Louisiana implicated some issues relating to the child sex abuse scandals involving schools and churches.

After the decision came down, the court was made aware that it had not addressed the fact that the military justice system permitted the death penalty for the crime of child rape, which some argued undercut the majority's claim that there was a national consensus against such a penalty.

This week, the justices considered these arguments in their private conference, and the result was a modification to their original opinion in Kennedy, but a rejection of a request to reopen the case. The court announces its disposition, and has a statement from the original five justices in the majority in the case here. Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., issues this statement on the denial of the request for rehearing. Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr. would have granted rehearing.

4 Comments

I wonder why i shook the man hand when he handed the diplomia to me Mr chandler that is now all of a suden. U.S distict court Birmingham ,Al. SAYS INEVER WALKED ACROSS THE STAGE DOWN THE STREET FROM WHERE I HAD A INSURANCE POLICY OWN A TRUCK I OWNED A 25,0000 DOLLAR AN SHOOK THE MAN HAN FOR ACCEPTANCE. THIS IS TRUELY BAFALELING AS I SLEEP IN THE STREETS IN THE CITY I GREW UP IN.

I wonder why i shook the man hand when he handed the diplomia to me Mr chandler that is now all of a suden. U.S distict court Birmingham ,Al. SAYS INEVER WALKED ACROSS THE STAGE DOWN THE STREET FROM WHERE I HAD A INSURANCE POLICY OWN A TRUCK I OWNED A 25,0000 DOLLAR AN SHOOK THE MAN HAN FOR ACCEPTANCE. THIS IS TRUELY BAFALELING AS I SLEEP IN THE STREETS IN THE CITY I GREW UP IN.

I wonder why i shook the man hand when he handed the diplomia to me Mr chandler that is now all of a suden. U.S distict court Birmingham ,Al. SAYS INEVER WALKED ACROSS THE STAGE DOWN THE STREET FROM WHERE I HAD A INSURANCE POLICY OWN A TRUCK I OWNED A 25,0000 DOLLAR AN SHOOK THE MAN HAN FOR ACCEPTANCE. THIS IS TRUELY BAFALELING AS I SLEEP IN THE STREETS IN THE CITY I GREW UP IN.

hi,
your suggestion are really nice. you have given valuable information to us. Thanks for the sharing.

Comments are now closed for this post.

Follow This Blog

Advertisement

Most Viewed on Education Week

Categories

Archives

Recent Comments