« Concealed-Carry Gun Rights Near Schools Get Attention | Main | Appeals Court Backs Parents in Special Education Placement »

U.S. Court Rebuffs Civil Rights Claim in Student's Drowning

The Milwaukee school district may not be held liable under federal law for the drowning death of a 12-year-old student on a class outing to a lake, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday.

The parents of Kamonie Slade sued the school district and several educators after their son drowned while swimming at a public beach in Kettle Moraine State Forest in southeastern Wisconsin. Kamonie's school had sought parental permission for students to "play in the water" on the field trip. But the beach had no lifeguard, and the Milwaukee district's rules forbid recreational swimming on field trips when no lifeguard is present.

Court papers say Kamonie was a poor swimmer but waded deeper and deeper into the lake until he was drawn either by a current or the slope of the lake to a depth that was over his head.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, in Chicago, upheld the dismissal of the family's federal civil rights claim, though the court suggested the family's state-law claims for negligence, at least against the assistant principal who led the field trip, may well be "meritorious."

But in the opinion for the unanimous 7th Circuit court panel in Slade v. Board of School Directors of the City of Milwaukee, Judge Richard A. Posner says the parents' arguments that the defendants enticed Kamonie into danger "overshoot the mark."

"The defendants' negligence enhanced the risk to Kamonie, but negligence is not enticement, or deliberate indifference, or blindness to obvious dangers," Posner writes in the Dec. 27 ruling.

The judge explores various concepts from U.S. Supreme Court and lower-court decisions dealing with civil rights claims seeking to hold government agencies liable for private harm to individuals, such as "deliberate indifference" and "shock the conscience" behavior. Posner suggests that "recklessness" is the proper standard for such cases, and that the defendants' behavior did not deprive Kamonie of his life in violation of the due process clause of the 14th Amendment.

Still, besides suggesting potential state-law negligence, Judge Posner had harsh words for some of the school district's defenses.

"Kamonie was only a 12-year-old," Posner writes. "He lacked mature judgment; and he was subject to the usual peer pressures that beset children. Was it realistic to expect him to hang back when his classmates were splashing around in the water? The defendants' argument that Kamonie was the author of his own death is heartless."

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Follow This Blog


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments

  • shutters: Its difficult once your kids get older to keep them read more
  • Joel Reidenberg: The study does not challenge the value to local schools read more
  • Joe: So, public schools are collecting their students' data in ways read more
  • JT: I still find it unbelievable that people can work in read more
  • Sandra Surace: What can a person do who suffered retaliation by school read more