« Schools Could Use Guidance on Physical Education for Disabled Kids | Main | One Organization's Take on Reauthorizing IDEA »

Agencies Starting To Drop "Retarded" Label

While legislators are pushing to drop the term "mentally retarded" from the federal government's lexicon, other groups and organizations are making that change on their own, according to this article from the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review:

Government agencies have been renaming themselves to drop the words "mentally retarded" from offices that serve people with special needs.

Starting July 1, the Allegheny County Office of Mental Retardation/Developmental Disabilities will be known as the Allegheny County Office of Intellectual Disability.

"The term 'mentally retarded' focused only the limitations of people, that somehow these were people who were substandard," said Donald Clark, deputy director of the office, which comes under the county Department of Human Services. "People with intellectual disabilities can live productive lives."

The article quotes some other agency name changes, like the "American Association on Mental Retardation" becoming the "American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities."

One organization that I've dealt with professionally, The Arc of the United States, has changed its name several times over the decades. Before the most recent incarnation, it was the Association for Retarded Citizens of the United States.

(The only problem with the current name, from a reporter's point of view, is that it retains no obvious connection to intellectual disabilities. In every story I find myself having to explain what the organization is on the off chance someone thinks I might be talking about the American Red Cross.)

I'm curious to know what readers think about the term "special needs," which is showing up as a synonym for any number of disability categories. I don't like it because it is inexact, and because it also sounds a little too cutesy and euphemistic. Am I wrong about that?

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Follow This Blog


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments

  • sdc teach: I agree with the previous post regarding the high cost read more
  • Jason: That alert is from 2001. Is there anything more recent read more
  • Vikki Mahaffy: I worked as a special education teacher for 18 years read more
  • paulina rickards: As it relates to this research I am in total read more
  • Anonymous: Fully fund the RTI process. We are providing special education read more