« Agencies Starting To Drop "Retarded" Label | Main | West Virginia's Modest Waiver Request »

One Organization's Take on Reauthorizing IDEA

No one ever asks me, "Christina, when do you think the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act will be reauthorized, and how closely do you think the special education law will be tied to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act?"

But I wish someone would. First, I could point them to my colleagues over at Politics K-12, who have written recently about the timing of the ESEA (also known as "No Child Left Behind") reauthorization. Completing ESEA this year looks like a long shot, and IDEA, which was last reauthorized in 2004, is too closely bound to ESEA to be approved on its own.

And then I could show them the glossy document (pdf) created by the Council for Exceptional Children, which outlines what that organization would like to see in the reauthorization of both laws.

CEC would like to see the law focus on good professional development, the inclusion of students with disabilities in state assessments, and the inclusion of the principle of response to intervention in ESEA, the main federal education law (right now, references to RTI only appears in the IDEA.)

And, no surprise, the CEC also wants the feds fork over more cash for special education, a continuing complaint among those in the field. Does anyone else have thoughts of that they'd like to see in these education laws? (Maybe a ban on restraint and seclusion?)

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Follow This Blog


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments

  • sdc teach: I agree with the previous post regarding the high cost read more
  • Jason: That alert is from 2001. Is there anything more recent read more
  • Vikki Mahaffy: I worked as a special education teacher for 18 years read more
  • paulina rickards: As it relates to this research I am in total read more
  • Anonymous: Fully fund the RTI process. We are providing special education read more