« Worth the Effort? A Look at the Value of State Determinations | Main | Feds To Survey Parents/Caregivers of Youth With Disabilities »

Weekend Reading: Emotional/Behavioral Disorder in the News

Two important stories have come up this week that are worth a mention. The first: Georgia has banned the use of seclusion rooms in all its districts, and will limit the use of restraints. From the Atlanta Journal-Constitution:

Brad Bryant, newly appointed state schools superintendent, said Georgia is "one of the first states in the nation to step forward aggressively" on the issue.

The state board worked for about two years developing the policy, which was supported by the parents of Jonathan King, a 13-year-old Hall County boy who hanged himself in 2004.

Jonathan was attending the Alpine Program, a public school in Gainesville for students with emotional and behavioral problems, when he killed himself with a cord a teacher gave him to hold up his pants.

His final hours were spent in an 8-by-8 seclusion room at the school. The room had no windows, bathroom, food or water.

This rules change is good news, and a great move for Georgia. Unfortunately, there's troubling news out of Connecticut. A year-long investigation from an advocacy organization there has turned up a number of disturbing trends about the education of students with severe behavior disorders. From the Boston Globe:

During visits to various Hartford schools that serve students with emotional and behavioral problems, staff from the Office of Protection and Advocacy found scarce resources, such as functioning computers, stationery supplies, resource materials and appropriate space for students to work. One site had no drinking fountain or water cooler. Recreational space was limited and the only exercise available to students was to sweep the sidewalk, according to the report.

"Even this was stopped after it was pointed out that busy traffic on the adjacent street presented possible dangers," the report said.

Investigators found a lack of counselors, psychologists and clinical staff, even though the programs were described as therapeutic. Often the special education students were separated from the other students and denied access to certain areas when those other students were present.

A full copy of the report is available here, and it is worth a read. Also, here's a short article on the District's response to the report.

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Follow This Blog


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments

  • sdc teach: I agree with the previous post regarding the high cost read more
  • Jason: That alert is from 2001. Is there anything more recent read more
  • Vikki Mahaffy: I worked as a special education teacher for 18 years read more
  • paulina rickards: As it relates to this research I am in total read more
  • Anonymous: Fully fund the RTI process. We are providing special education read more