« Maryland Parents Seeking Legislation to Shift IEP 'Burden of Proof' | Main | Tracking the Origins of Persistent Math Difficulties in Young Children »

Smarter Balanced Reports Student Views on Field-Test Accommodations

About two-thirds of students who offered their opinions about the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium field tests said the built-in accommodations—such as calculators, highlighting tools, and zoom—were easy to use. 

However, about a quarter to a third of the responding students said had never used any, or only one, of the built-in supports before test day. According to a report released last week by the consortium, every student will have to become familiar with all the tools by the spring of 2015, when the common-core-aligned tests will be used for accountability purposes. 

The report is not a scientific sample of students and states that participated in the field tests. Instead, it identifies major themes that emerged from individual surveys developed by 13 of the 22 members of the consortium. Feedback was gathered from 19,600 students and 4,946 adults (who include administrators, classroom  teachers and proctors and test coordinators).

The built-in accommodations and supports are of particular interest to students with disabilities. The report did not dive into the comments around specific accommodations, but it did find that 67 percent of students in five states found the test "easy" or "very easy" to use. The report concluded that students should be given opportunities to become familiar with the testing platform, "so that the final results describe students' knowledge and skill rather than their familiarity with the test format."

My colleague, Catherine Gewertz, has pulled out some additional snippets of interesting information from the report in her blog, Curriculum Matters. 

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Follow This Blog


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments

  • sdc teach: I agree with the previous post regarding the high cost read more
  • Jason: That alert is from 2001. Is there anything more recent read more
  • Vikki Mahaffy: I worked as a special education teacher for 18 years read more
  • paulina rickards: As it relates to this research I am in total read more
  • Anonymous: Fully fund the RTI process. We are providing special education read more