« Clinton Pledges More Economic Support for People With Disabilities | Main | Education Secretary Notes Progress, Challenges at Spec. Ed. Convention »

Vermont Questions Price Hike for Common-Core Aligned Alternate Test

The board that oversees Dynamic Learning Maps, a testing and instructional system for students with severe cognitive disabilities, is raising the test's price from $39 to $459 per student in Vermont—a move that may prompt the state to work with another test provider.

Dynamic Learning Maps is one of two groups that created alternate assessments that are aligned to the common core. The second group was the National Center and State Collaborative, now called the Multi-State Alternate Assessment. These tests are intended for the small group of special education students—no more than 10 percent—whose disabilities leave them unable to take regular tests. 

(Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium and the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers are the two groups that created regular common-core aligned tests.) 

Fourteen states are in the Dynamic Learning Maps consortium: Alaska, Colorado, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Utah, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.

The Associated Press reported this week that the Vermont education secretary believes the pricing decision was made without transparency and involvement from state education chiefs. The University of Kansas' Center for Educational Testing and Evaluation administers the test, and interim director Neal Kingston also opposes the price changes, the article states. 

"Since in fact (for) the majority of the states ... it costs more under the scenario they approved, my expectation is that there is a very good chance that they will change the cost allocation method to one that is not adverse to small states," Kingston told the AP.

Related Stories:

 for the latest news on special education policies, practices, and trends.

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Follow This Blog


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments

  • sdc teach: I agree with the previous post regarding the high cost read more
  • Jason: That alert is from 2001. Is there anything more recent read more
  • Vikki Mahaffy: I worked as a special education teacher for 18 years read more
  • paulina rickards: As it relates to this research I am in total read more
  • Anonymous: Fully fund the RTI process. We are providing special education read more