« Five-State Initiative to Boost Principals' Knowledge of Special Education | Main | One in 5 Students With Significant ADHD Gets No School-Based Help, Study Finds »

National School Boards Association Pushes for Federal Special Education Law Overhaul

Is this the year that Congress will take up the long-overdue renewal of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act—plus boost funding for the law? 

The National School Boards Association wants to see both. Advocating for "full funding" of IDEA is a perennial issue, but the association is also drawing attention to the fact that the law, last reauthorized in 2004, needs to be rewritten to address more up-to-date concerns about educating students with disabilities. 

"This is our big initiative, our big push for this Congress," said Thomas Gentzel, the executive director of the school boards association.

And the organization is moving forward on multiple fronts. First, Congress has already shown it can pass major education bills—the Every Student Succeeds Act was passed four years ago, and in 2018, Congress passed and President Trump signed the Strengthening Career and Technical Education for the 21st Century Act, a reauthorization of the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act. That $1.2 billion program was last passed by Congress in 2006. 

So, Gentzel said, Congress has shown that it can do this policy work, even though lawmakers have yet to introduce this session a bill that would increase IDEA funding. "It's important for Congress to express its support for the legislation it passed but funding it at the level it promised to fund it." 

Back in 1975, when the law that was to become the Individuals with Disabilities Act was passed, Congress authorized itself to pick up 40 percent of the extra cost of educating a student in special education. But the federal government has never come close to that level. Right now, the federal government pays for about 14 percent of those expenses, leaving the rest to states and school districts. Current federal spending under the IDEA stands at $12.5 billion. 

Gentzel said that NSBA plans to start talking about special education success stories. "They exist in every congressional district in the country."

That said, there are some parts of the law that could be improved, said Chris Ungar, a former special education teacher and administrator who is also a member of the board of the NSBA. "For example, now that ESSA  has been reauthorized, it's important that we look at the connection between ESSA and IDEA." 

Accountability is an important example, Ungar said. "When we hear about teachers spending up to 40 percent of their time on compliance isues, we need to talk about that and we need to talk about what that means for the education of students, if we're taking teachers away from actually teaching." 

A renewed IDEA could also take into account the differences in student population over the last 15 years, Ungar said. There's been a marked increase in the number of children diagnosed with autism, for example, though students with "specific learning disabilities" such as dyslexia remain the largest group of students with disabilities.

Gentzel said the the Democrats, who now control the House of Representatives, have a "pent-up agenda" that they want to take on a number of different education topics. 

"One of our goals is to make sure [special education] is one of those issues," he said. 


Don't miss another On Special Education post. Sign up here to get news alerts in your email inbox.

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Follow This Blog

Advertisement

Most Viewed on Education Week

Categories

Archives

Recent Comments

  • sdc teach: I agree with the previous post regarding the high cost read more
  • Jason: That alert is from 2001. Is there anything more recent read more
  • Vikki Mahaffy: I worked as a special education teacher for 18 years read more
  • paulina rickards: As it relates to this research I am in total read more
  • Anonymous: Fully fund the RTI process. We are providing special education read more