<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>On Special Education</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2008:/edweek/speced/58</id>
   <updated>2008-05-16T22:05:26Z</updated>
   <subtitle>Education Week reporter Christina A. Samuels tracks news and trends of interest to the special education community, including administrators, teachers, and parents.</subtitle>
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.34</generator>

<entry>
   <title>Books of the Future</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/2008/05/books_of_the_future_1.html" />
   <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2008:/edweek/speced//58.5770</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-16T21:56:16Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-16T22:05:26Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Late last year I wrote an article on &quot;universal design for learning,&quot; an educational philosophy that promotes using technology to supplement teaching materials and make them accessible to all types of students. UDL had found support among several disability advocacy...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Christina Samuels</name>
      <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Inclusion" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Instruction" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="NCLB" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/">
      <![CDATA[Late last year I wrote <a href="http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2007/10/31/10udl.h27.html">an article</a> on "universal design for learning," an educational philosophy that promotes using technology to supplement teaching materials and make them accessible to all types of students. UDL had found support among several disability advocacy organizations, who wanted the concept included in the reauthorization of the federal No Child Left Behind law.

Ricki Sabia, an advocate with the National Down Syndrome Society, just sent me <a href="http://udleditions.cast.org/">a link </a>that shows an example of universally designed texts created by the <a href="http://www.cast.org/research/udl/index.html">Center for Applied Special Technology</a> in Wakefield, Mass., which has spearheaded the UDL movement.

This is really quite cool. As Ricki noted, the site offers text-to-speech technology, pop-up definitions of words, comprehension questions at four levels of difficulty, links to encyclopedia entries and translations between English and Spanish. It's a great example of the promise that UDL offers to make educational materials broadly useful. And it's fun, too -- I'm enjoying going through "The Tell-Tale Heart," one of my favorite spooky stories from middle school, and clicking on all the extra resources included as part of the text. 

]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Hey You GUUUUYS!</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/2008/05/hey_you_guuuuys_1.html" />
   <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2008:/edweek/speced//58.5750</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-15T20:27:11Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-15T20:27:46Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I can&apos;t be the only Generation X-er thrilled to hear about the return of The Electric Company, right? I was primarily a Sesame Street gal, but I remember many a leisurely afternoon hanging out with Rita Moreno and Morgan &quot;Easy...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Christina Samuels</name>
      <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced</uri>
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/">
      <![CDATA[I can't be the only Generation X-er thrilled to hear about the return of <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/12/arts/television/12elec.html">The Electric Company</a>, right? I was primarily a Sesame Street gal, but I remember many a leisurely afternoon hanging out with Rita Moreno and Morgan "Easy Reader" Freeman.

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/s_PuAqRQLKA&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/s_PuAqRQLKA&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

I honestly didn't know at the time that these shows were intended to help me learn to read; I just thought it was fun with letters and numbers. But this incarnation of The Electric Company, just like the groovy 1970s version, is intended in part to help kids get past the <a href="http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2007/09/12/03slump.h27.html">"fourth grade slump."</a>

<blockquote>The producers said that they hoped the show would help head off a vexing problem: the wall that struggling students hit in fourth grade, the turning point at which school is no longer about learning to read, but reading to learn. As it was for the first incarnation of “The Electric Company,” the target audience this time is the economically disadvantaged child.

“Lower-income kids are already behind the eight ball by the time they reach kindergarten,” said Karen Fowler, the show’s executive producer. “By second grade language is flying by them, and they have no reference for it. That’s devastating.”</blockquote>
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Small Schools and Spec Ed</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/2008/05/small_schools_and_spec_ed_1.html" />
   <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2008:/edweek/speced//58.5713</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-13T19:26:29Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-13T19:25:24Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I was hoping that Implementation Study of Smaller Learning Communities: Final Report (pdf) released Monday by the U.S. Department of Education might have some tidbits about how these school structures have affected students with disabilities. The federal government provided funding...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Christina Samuels</name>
      <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Federal policy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/">
      <![CDATA[I was hoping that <a href="http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/other/small-communities/final-report.pdf"><em>Implementation Study of Smaller Learning Communities: Final Report </em></a> (pdf) released Monday by the U.S. Department of Education might have some tidbits about how these school structures have affected students with disabilities. The federal government provided funding to districts so that they could start these programs. And, if the idea is to break large, impersonal schools down into nurturing structures that cater to individual students' needs, students in special education would seem to be an ideal audience. 

But, no luck. The only information about students with disabilities contained in the report, which examined 119 small schools in 2002 and 2003, is that they tend to have fewer students with disabilities on a percentage basis than do large high schools overall. About 61 percent of large high schools have a population of 10 to 15 percent students with disabilities, compared with 36 percent of small schools.

The small schools also reported needing more resources for special education: 49 percent said there was "some need" for more special education resources, while 13 percent said there was a "great need." 

The study's authors note that the results focused mainly on school structure. Only limited information was available on student outcomes.

Others people have serious problems with small schools and how they enroll students with disabilities. From <a href="http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2007/08/01/44small.h26.html">an article</a> I wrote last year about the small schools movement in New York City:

<blockquote>...school size is no excuse for not offering services mandated under the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, said David C. Bloomfield, a professor and the head of the educational leadership program at Brooklyn College, a branch of the City University of New York. Mr. Bloomfield, the past president of New York’s Citywide Council on High Schools, has been an outspoken critic of the enrollment policy at the small schools...

New York officials tout the success of the small schools, which have higher graduation rates than other schools in the city, but those that enroll special-needs students accept children whose disabilities aren’t very serious, Mr. Bloomfield said. 

Then the schools “wave a banner of success,” he said, “when they have a thumb on the scale in their favor.”</blockquote>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Asian-Americans and NCLB</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/2008/05/asianamericans_and_nclb_1.html" />
   <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2008:/edweek/speced//58.5702</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-12T20:44:36Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-12T20:43:35Z</updated>
   
   <summary>My colleague David Hoff has a great article on our Web site now about a group that contends Asian-American children are being shortchanged under the federal No Child Left Behind Act. The Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund noted...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Christina Samuels</name>
      <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="NCLB" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/">
      <![CDATA[My colleague David Hoff <a href="http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2008/05/14/37asian.h27.html">has a great article</a> on our Web site now about a group that contends Asian-American children are being shortchanged under the federal No Child Left Behind Act.

The Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund noted that the NCLB provisions for tracking ethnic subgroups are not adequate for Asians, and that Asian children who are English-language learners may have different needs and struggle in different areas than Hispanic students. Too often, the group contends, the unique struggles of Asian children are ignored because they're often seen as "model minorities."

This complaint reminds me of what I've heard from some disability advocates. Monitoring students with disabilities is the only way they feel they can get schools to care about their kids. There's real concern, though, that all the "flexibility" in the law may mean that children with disabilities will be left out in the cold. 

It'll be fascinating to see what will happen to NCLB under a new administration, especially for students with disabilities. Right now, the candidates are full of promises, but offer few details. I've already told my friend <a href="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/campaign-k-12/">Michele McNeil</a> that I will have to deploy audience members strategically during any potential town hall meetings to grill the candidates about special education. 
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Driveway Moment</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/2008/05/driveway_moment_1.html" />
   <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2008:/edweek/speced//58.5690</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-09T18:28:26Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-09T18:37:58Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I have to admit that the connection to special education is pretty tenuous, but I was transfixed by a story on NPR Wednesday about two families coping with transgendered young sons. One family decided to let their child live as...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Christina Samuels</name>
      <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Inclusion" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Parenting" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/">
      <![CDATA[I have to admit that the connection to special education is pretty tenuous, but I was transfixed by a <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90247842">story on NPR </a> Wednesday about two families coping with transgendered young sons. One family decided to let their child live as a girl while another family is trying to make their son feel more comfortable in his biological gender, including taking away his "girlish" toys. Now, the child's mother says, her son has some friends who are boys and is no longer saying that he's a girl...but she senses that he's leading a double life. At school he plays with girls; at home, he knows that behavior is not acceptable. It's a compelling tale.

(The second part of the series, about a family that is considering hormone therapy to delay puberty for their transgendered son, is available <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90273278">here</a>.)

Though the school/education angle was only a small part of the NPR stories, a quick Google search shows that this is hardly the first time that schools have had to make accommodations for transgendered youth. <a href="http://www.philly.com/inquirer/local/pa/chester/20080503_School_challenge__Transgender_student_is_age_9.html">This article</a>, which ran Saturday in the Philadelphia Inquirer, talks about the controversy that erupted when a 9-year-old third grader planned to transition into life as a girl. The school held an assembly for students to explain the situation. That didn't go over well with some parents. 
<blockquote>"I did not think that the letter needed to go out," said Valerie Huff, whose daughter is a friend of the transgender student. "The kids don't make any big deal about it at all." 

Mary Beth Lauer, district director of community relations, said there were no easy answers for school officials.

"This is something that was going to come out," Lauer said. "Isn't it better to be proactive, and let people know what is happening and how we're dealing with it?"</blockquote>

Does anyone have personal stories about schools and transgendered youth?]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>It&apos;s All Wright</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/2008/05/the_wright_way_1.html" />
   <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2008:/edweek/speced//58.5670</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-08T22:00:22Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-11T04:04:47Z</updated>
   
   <summary>It might be risky to draw attention to another special education blog, but I can&apos;t ignore the recent launch of Wrightslaw Blog. Wrightslaw has been a reliable source of information for me since I started covering special education four years...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Christina Samuels</name>
      <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced</uri>
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/">
      <![CDATA[It might be risky to draw attention to another special education blog, but I can't ignore the recent launch of <a href="http://www.wrightslaw.com/blog/">Wrightslaw Blog. </a>

Wrightslaw has been a reliable source of information for me since I started covering special education four years ago, when I didn't know IDEA from FAPE. The perspective is that of a parent advocate, which Peter Wright has been for decades. In 1993, he represented the parents in a Supreme Court case, <a href="http://www.wrightslaw.com/law/caselaw/ussupct.carter.htm"><em>Florence County</em> v. <em>Shannon Carter</em></a>, in which the court unanimously held that parents can be reimbursed by a school district for tuition when they place their children in private schools, even if the private school is not previously approved by the district.

I've used Wrightslaw as a handy source for documentation in special education cases. I also appreciate his measured advice to parents; his website advises parents to know the law, stay polite and professional, and get everything possible in writing. Not a bad set of suggestions.  ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Reid Lyon on Reading First</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/2008/05/reid_lyon_on_reading_first.html" />
   <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2008:/edweek/speced//58.5657</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-05T23:00:43Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-05T23:10:46Z</updated>
   
   <summary>G. Reid Lyon, a key architect of the Reading First program and the former chief of the child development and behavior branch at the National Institutes of Health, weighed in today on the interim report on Reading First released last...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Christina Samuels</name>
      <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="RTI" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/">
      <![CDATA[G. Reid Lyon, a key architect of the Reading First program and the former chief of the child development and behavior branch at the National Institutes of Health, weighed in today on the interim report on Reading First released last week. 

His <a href="http://ednews.org/articles/25335/1/Interview-with-Reid-Lyon-Reading-First-is-the-largest-concerted-reading-intervention-program-in-the-history-of-the-civilized-world/Page1.html">in-depth responses</a> on the ednews.org website offer a different perspective on the report, which showed no difference in reading comprehension levels for students who were instructed in Reading First, and those who were not.

<em>Thanks to JohnL at <a href="http://teacheffectively.com/">Teach Effectively</a> for the tip.</em>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>&quot;IDEA Fairness Restoration Act&quot;</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/2008/05/idea_fairness_restoration_act_1.html" />
   <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2008:/edweek/speced//58.5654</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-05T20:00:01Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-05T20:49:22Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates and other like-minded organizations want you to spend May 6 calling your congressional representatives on behalf of a bill that seeks to award expert witness fees to parents who win due-process disputes against...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Christina Samuels</name>
      <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="IDEA" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/">
      <![CDATA[The Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates and other like-minded organizations want you to spend May 6 calling your congressional representatives on behalf of a bill that seeks to award expert witness fees to parents who win due-process disputes against schools. 

<a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-4188">H.R. 4188</a> seeks to undo a policy created by the U.S. Supreme Court's 2006 decision in <em>Arlington </em>V. <em>Murphy</em>. In that case, the court decided that parents who prevail in special education cases are not entitled to be reimbursed for the fees they pay to experts, such as educational consultants. 

(Education Week covered the case extensively, as you can find <a href="http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2006/01/18/19scotus.h25.html">here </a>and <a href="http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2006/06/26/42scotus_web.h25.html">here</a>. I wrote a profile of Marilyn Arons, a parents' advocate at the center of the case, in a story <a href="http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2006/04/12/31idea.h25.html">here</a>.)

COPAA's <a href="http://www.copaa.net/news/ask_congress.html">take on the issue</a> is that "few parents can afford the thousands of dollars needed to pay qualified medical, educational, and technical experts.  While parents must hire expert witnesses to testify, school districts can use therapists, psychologists, and other expert witnesses on their own payroll, or hire outside experts with taxpayer dollars."

Charles Fox's <a href="http://specialedlaw.blogs.com/home/2008/04/idea-fairness-r.html">Special Education Law Blog</a> has more information about the May 6 call to action. 
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Reading First and RTI</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/2008/05/reading_first_and_rti.html" />
   <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2008:/edweek/speced//58.5646</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-02T18:33:06Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-02T20:34:25Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Everyone should check out the article written by my colleague Kathleen Kennedy Manzo about a major federal report on the $1 billion Reading First initiative. Students in schools receiving grants from the program perform no better than students in comparison...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Christina Samuels</name>
      <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="RTI" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/">
      <![CDATA[Everyone should check out the <a href="http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2008/05/07/36read_ep.h27.html">article </a>written by my colleague Kathleen Kennedy Manzo about a major federal report on the $1 billion Reading First initiative. Students in schools receiving grants from the program perform no better than students in comparison schools in reading comprehension. Many states use their Reading First dollars to implement response-to-intervention frameworks in their schools. 

<a href="http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20084016/execsumm_program.asp">The interim report</a> and Kathleen's reporting suggest that Reading First has done a great job improving the ability of kids to decode words, but their ability to derive meaning from what they've read still falls short.

RTI is just a way of providing instruction, and districts have their own twists on how they implement it. But, in visits to schools, I've seen the kind of highly structured, scripted instruction on basic skills that this report points to as a potential problem area. Does such instruction get better results than less-scripted efforts? If nothing else, the report suggest that instruction in reading comprehension needs to get more attention as part of an RTI framework. 

After you finish Kathleen's article, check out other articles in the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/01/washington/01cnd-read.html">New York Times</a>, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/01/AR2008050101399.html">The Washington Post,</a> and <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2008-05-01-reading-first_N.htm">USA Today.</a>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Jeremiah Wright on Education</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/2008/05/jeremiah_wright_on_education.html" />
   <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2008:/edweek/speced//58.5637</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-01T21:34:41Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-02T16:08:57Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Rev. Jeremiah Wright, former pastor of Trinity United Methodist Church Church of Christ in Chicago, doesn&apos;t just have a lot to say about politics--he also has some thoughts on special education as well, which he shared during his April 27...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Christina Samuels</name>
      <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Behavior" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Instruction" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/">
      <![CDATA[Rev. Jeremiah Wright, former pastor of Trinity United <strike>Methodist Church</strike> Church of Christ in Chicago, doesn't just have a lot to say about politics--he also has some thoughts on special education as well, which he shared during his <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/04/28/wright.transcript/index.html">April 27 speech before the NAACP in Detroit:</a>

<blockquote> Turn to your neighbor and say different does not mean deficient. It simply means different. In fact, Dr. Janice Hale was the first writer whom I read who used that phrase. Different does not mean deficient. Different is not synonymous with deficient....Dr. Hale showed us that in comparing African-American children and European-American children in the field of education, we were comparing apples and rocks.

And in so doing, we kept coming up with meaningless labels like EMH, educable mentally handicapped, TMH, trainable mentally handicapped, ADD, attention deficit disorder.

And we were coming up with more meaningless solutions like reading, writing and Ritalin. Dr. Hale's research led her to stop comparing African-American children with European-American children and she started comparing the pedagogical methodologies of African-American children to African children and European-American children to European children. And bingo, she discovered that the two different worlds have two different ways of learning....

Some of you are old enough, I see your hair color, to remember when the NAACP won that tremendous desegregation case back in 1954 and when the schools were desegregated. They were never integrated. When they were desegregated in Philadelphia, several of the white teachers in my school freaked out. Why? Because black kids wouldn't stay in their place. Over there behind the desk, black kids climbed up all on them.

Because they learn from a subject, not from an object. Tell me a story. They have a different way of learning. Those same children who have difficulty reading from an object and who are labeled EMH, TMH, and ADD. Those children can say every word from every song on every hip-hop radio station half of whose words the average adult here tonight cannot understand. Why? Because they come from a right-brained creative oral culture like the griots in Africa who can go for two or three days as oral repositories of a people's history....</blockquote>

<a href="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/2008/03/black_cultural_learning_styles_1.html">"Black cultural learning styles,"</a> anyone?

<em>Thanks to <a href="http://joannejacobs.com/">Joanne Jacobs</a> for the tip.</em>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Disabilities on the Silver Screen</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/2008/04/disabilities_on_the_silver_scr_1.html" />
   <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2008:/edweek/speced//58.5619</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-29T20:48:05Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-29T21:15:19Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Readers who will be in New York May 9-11 should check out the Sprout Film Festival, a three day showing of films by and about people with disabilities. The first day features &quot;Including Samuel,&quot; a movie I didn&apos;t get a...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Christina Samuels</name>
      <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced</uri>
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/">
      <![CDATA[Readers who will be in New York May 9-11 should check out the <a href="http://www.gosprout.org/film/">Sprout Film Festival</a>, a three day showing of films by and about people with disabilities.

The first day features <a href="http://www.includingsamuel.com/">"Including Samuel,"</a> a movie I didn't get a chance to see when it was shown in the D.C. area., unfortunately. The documentary, filmed by photojournalist Dan Habib, shows a family's efforts to involve their son Samuel, who has cerebral palsy, in every part of educational and social life. The last day of the festival will include a showing of <a href="http://www.autismthemusical.com/">"Autism: The Musical,"</a> which was recently broadcast on HBO. 

Several other short films and documentaries look fascinating, like a 1970 documentary, <a href="http://www.gosprout.org/film/info28.htm">"A Time for Georgia,"</a> about a girl with autism&mdash;I'd love to know what we thought of the disorder at that time, compared to now. <a href="http://www.gosprout.org/film/info25.htm">"Fathers' Voices"</a> is a short film on how men are affected by children with disabilities. 

If anyone happens to catch any of these showings, feel free to leave a comment. ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>The Battle Over Medicaid Funding</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/2008/04/the_battle_over_medicaid_fundi_1.html" />
   <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2008:/edweek/speced//58.5590</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-25T20:07:31Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-25T20:39:31Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly on Wednesday to put a hold on new Medicaid rules that would prevent schools from being reimbursed for providing certain services on behalf of some students with disabilities. But the Senate Republican leadership is...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Christina Samuels</name>
      <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Medicaid" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/">
      <![CDATA[The House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly on Wednesday to put a hold on new Medicaid rules that would prevent schools from being reimbursed for providing certain services on behalf of some students with disabilities. But the Senate Republican leadership is urging its colleagues to reject the House measure, so the fight, for schools, is not over yet.

You'd know this already if you were on the e-mail list of the <a href="http://www.theleanet.com/">LEAnet</a>, which describes itself as a "growing coalition of local education agencies dedicated to the protection and enhancement of school health programs." Gregory K. Morris, the executive director of the organization, has not let his keyboard cool off in days.

What does Medicaid have to do with schools? Since 1988, schools have been able to get reimbursement from the federal heath-insurance program for the poor for certain services provided to Medicaid-eligible kids with disabilities. Generally, these services would be for some types of therapies, like speech or occupational.

That's not changing. But what the administration would like to do is <a href="http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2007/09/12/03medicaid.h27.html">stop paying </a>for certain administrative costs schools incur for managing the program, and transportation costs for getting a Medicaid-eligible child to school. That's not an appropriate Medicaid expense, the administration says. The change could save the government $3.6 billion over five years.

Schools officials, obviously, disagree. <a href="http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2008/01/09/17medicaid.h27.html">But the administration followed through</a> on putting the new rules into effect--after a six-month moratorium to allow schools to prepare for the the change, the administration said. We're still in that six-month period, and as promised, school advocates are fighting hard to make sure those new rules never go into effect.

<a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-5613">The House bill</a> that was just passed would extend the moratorium until April 2009--well past election day. The thinking is that a new administration might have a more favorable stance on this issue, from the schools' point of view.

How will it turn out? Stay tuned...



]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>New Charter School for the Deaf</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/2008/04/new_charter_school_for_the_dea_1.html" />
   <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2008:/edweek/speced//58.5585</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-24T19:37:52Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-24T20:25:08Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Nevada&apos;s first school exclusively for deaf and hard-of-hearing students is opening this fall in Las Vegas. The school will offer a bicultural/bilingual environment, with all teachers fluent in American Sign Language. The school plans to start small, according to the...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Christina Samuels</name>
      <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Deaf" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/">
      <![CDATA[Nevada's first school exclusively for deaf and hard-of-hearing students <a href="http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008/apr/24/first-dedicated-school-deaf-state-open/">is opening this fall</a> in Las Vegas. The school will offer a bicultural/bilingual environment, with all teachers fluent in American Sign Language.

The <a href="http://www.lvcsd.org/">school </a> plans to start small, according to the article, and is opening only for kindergarten through 3rd grades. The school founders hope to improve graduation rates for students with hearing impairments.

Late last year, I wrote an <a href="http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2007/12/05/14deaf.h27.html">article </a>about a school for the deaf in California and a student who is deaf and also has severe additional disabilities. In the course of my reporting, I learned that schools for the deaf nationwide have been struggling with low enrollment. Parents have more options in the public school system, or they may choose to have their children use devices like cochlear implants that they believe make education in specialized schools unnecessary. It'll be interesting to see if this charter school manages to buck that trend.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Parental Consent</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/2008/04/parental_consent.html" />
   <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2008:/edweek/speced//58.5575</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-23T21:30:27Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-23T21:52:54Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Virginia wants to drop a state requirement that parents have to be notified before terminating a student&apos;s special education services. Like many states, Virginia is in the process of aligning its state special education standards to the federal standards included...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Christina Samuels</name>
      <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="IDEA" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Parenting" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/">
      <![CDATA[Virginia wants to drop a state requirement that parents have to be notified before terminating a student's special education services.

Like many states, Virginia is in the process of aligning its state special education standards to the federal standards included in the 2004 Indviduals with Disabilities Education Act.The state says this type of notification isn't required in the federal standards.

The state gave an example of how this might work: If a student with a learning disability was receiving an hour of occupational therapy a day, the school would have to notify a parent if it determined the child only needed 30 minutes of daily therapy.

But, if the school decided the child didn't need any occupational therapy at all, dropping the service without prior parental consent would be fine. If the parent protested, the service would be maintained until the matter could be resolved through due process.

(More details on all the changes are available <a href="http://www.doe.virginia.gov/VDOE/dueproc/regulationsCWD.html">here</a>.)

No surprise, this proposed change hasn't gone over well with parents. According to a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/21/AR2008042102734.html">recent article</a> in the Washington Post, 3,000 comments have been filed with the state on this proposal, and Virginia Gov. Tim Kaine has said he's not in favor of that change. The state's largest district, Fairfax County, is neutral on the proposal. And least one member of the state's board of education says he was surprised by the idea.

"I've always been an advocate for parental involvement, but there must be some reason that people think this is the right time for no parent involvement," board member Gary Jones said in the Post article. "I'd be interested in knowing what the reason is."

I don't think this proposal will last very long.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>RTI Chat on Progress Monitoring</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/2008/04/rti_chat_on_progress_monitorin_1.html" />
   <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2008:/edweek/speced//58.5529</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-17T20:15:30Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-17T20:24:29Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The RTI Action Network that I blogged about recently plans its first online chat with Stanley L. Deno, a professor at the University of Minnesota and an expert in curriculum-based measurement. The chat is from 1 to 2 p.m. April...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Christina Samuels</name>
      <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="RTI" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/">
      <![CDATA[The RTI Action Network that I <a href="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/2008/04/rti_web_site_launches_1.html">blogged about recently</a> plans its first <a href="http://lioncld.forumone.com/content/interview/detail/1212/">online chat</a> with <a href="http://cehd.umn.edu/edpsych/faculty/Deno.html">Stanley L. Deno,</a> a professor at the University of Minnesota and an expert in <a href="http://www.studentprogress.org/families.asp">curriculum-based measurement.</a> 

The chat is from 1 to 2 p.m. April 23, and no special equipment needed other than a computer with internet access. It will also be archived for later reading if you can't tune in during the day.

 ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>
