« California Gov. Brown Proposes $4 Billion Boost for Schools and More Local Control | Main | Betsy DeVos' ESSA Feedback, Approvals, Cause More Consternation in States »

Connecticut Supreme Court Strikes Down School-Funding Case

Connecticut's supreme court has struck down a lower court ruling that deemed the state's school spending formula and several associated education policies unconstitutional.  

That September 2016 ruling rocked the state's political system for its sweeping condemnation of the state's teacher quality standards, special education spending, and the dwindling academic performance of the state's poor, black, and Hispanic students.  In the ruling, Superior Judge Thomas Moukawsher used flamboyant language that animated the state's teachers, administrators and politicians alike (read that entire ruling here).  

But the state's appointed supreme court said Wednesday it was not it's place to dictate how the legislature spends its money on schools.  

"The plaintiffs have not shown that this gap is the result of the state's unlawful discrimination against poor and needy students in its provision of educational resources as opposed to the complex web of disadvantaging societal conditions over which the schools have no control," Chief Justice Chase Rogers wrote.  

That language is similar to language used by Texas' elected supreme court last year that also said that while that state's schools had deeply entrenched problems,  it wasn't the court's role to mingle in state spending.  

The Connecticut lawsuit was brought in 2005 by the Connecticut Coaltion for Justice , a coalition of parents, teachers, school administrators and local officials. It argued that the state's school funding formula left behind the state's growing black and Hispanic communities.  

In response to the state supreme court's ruling, the group said they will continue to "pursue all legal remedies" in order to have the case "reconsidered and overturned," according to the Associated Press.  

Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy, a Democrat, said while the latest ruling marks the end of the constitutional fight over school funding, it doesn't end the political fight to more evenly distribute the state's school spending. The state is experiencing a financial crisis caused, in part, by ballooning pension costs.  

"We continue to believe that the state is obligated to ensure that funding is distributed in a rational manner based on student need, reflecting student poverty, and demographic shifts in our communities,"  he said in a statement.  

Don't miss another State EdWatch post. Sign up here to get news alerts in your email inbox. And make sure to follow @StateEdWatch on Twitter for the latest news from state K-12 policy and politics. 

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments