« Teacher Salaries Lag Behind Inflation, Says NEA | Main | Finlandia! »

Teachers Resisting Hawaii's Random Drug Tests


Hawaii wants to randomly test any of its teachers for drugs under a contract signed with the state teachers' union two years ago, but the union now says it will not play along.

The Hawaii State Teachers Association says the wording in the contract, which says the parties "agree to negotiate reasonable suspicion and random drug and alcohol testing procedures," is meant to apply only to teachers who go on field trips, work with disabled children, are frequently absent or have criminal records.

The Associated Press quoted Mike McCartney, executive director for the Hawaii State Teachers Association, saying "this is a huge distraction from how to make our schools better."

The union says it will agree to drug testing in cases where there's a reason to suspect drug use.

The matter is now awaiting a ruling from the Hawaii Labor Relations Board. Meanwhile, the American Civil Liberties Union has said it plans to sue the state because the program violates privacy rights, costs taxpayers too much money and does little to curb drug use.

One can't help but wonder why the education department decided to put the drug-testing program in place at all. Apparently, the impetus for Gov. Linda Lingle came after six education department employees were arrested in unrelated drug cases over a six-month period. But the state has over 13,000 teachers, and one cannot help but see the point when the teachers' union points out that the six arrested don't represent a majority nor do they indicate a trend of rampant drug use among Hawaii teachers.

But here's one good reason why the department of education could be mad at the teachers' union recalcitrance: they've already handed out 11 percent pay raises to the teachers, which the teachers were given in exchange for agreeing to the drug tests.



Thank you for reporting on this interesting conundrum.

If the teachers union agreed to the random drug test, one would think they'd abide by their end of the collective bargaining agreement - unless, of course, they have something to hide.

If we can have random drug testing for other public employees (police, fire) I'm not sure why it would not be appropriate for teachers as well?

The only language missing for me in the story was "probable cause." But would that have to come from teachers’ CORI reports, and if so, what in their CORI would constitute the cause?


You and Stephen have a number of interesting stories here. I’ll try to check in and respond more often now that I’ve discovered your blog.

Paul, You're right: there are many conundrums indeed around this situation which have led to the impasse. It will be interesting to watch and see how the teachers' union and the education department sort out their differences. We'll be sure to bring you more as the story develops.
Thanks for your comment, and we do look forward to seeing you around on Teacher Beat.

thanks for the article.
Screening and Testing for public position of people in influencical positions should be mandated. It seems the teachers got a raise (via union) but then when push came to shove they opted not abide by their part of the agreement?
What has come of this since you posted?

Comments are now closed for this post.

Follow This Blog


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments

  • lauren: cell phones are what kids crave on they need a read more
  • enjoyjd: One of the most frustrating things for me, when my read more
  • marty: I was once a superb teacher. Students loved me, parents read more
  • J. S. Gephardt: I totally agree that teachers should be evaluated on a read more
  • Lisa: Senority... most parents want their children in a seasoned teachers read more