« A "Map" for Current and Future Teachers | Main | Students No Worse Off With Alt-Cert Teachers »

Rhee Speaks!

| 2 Comments

District of Columbia schools Chancellor Michelle Rhee turns in a must-read piece in the Washington Post, in which she tries to set the record straight: Broom aside, she's not focused on firing teachers.

"I want to be clear about something: I do not blame teachers for the low-achievement levels. I have talked with too many teachers to believe this is their fault. I have watched them pour their energy into engaging every student. I know they are working furiously in a system that for many years has not appreciated them," Ms. Rhee writes.

As part of the upcoming contract negotiations, she says, she'll ensure that teachers' bonuses aren't based solely on test scores, ensure that they will take into account the individual growth of students relative to their starting point rather than to an absolute standard, won't force tenured teachers to give up their due-process protections, won't allow principals to wield arbitrary power, and will provide strong opportunities for teachers to receive high-quality professional development, one of the components of her five-year plan.

She also explains her take on removing ineffective teachers from the classroom:

"Do not misunderstand: I do not believe that most of our teachers are shortchanging their students. But in the worst cases, we have teachers who put their feet on their desks and read the paper while students run around. Or they use corporal punishment. Or they intentionally abuse their current contract, leaving for three months at a time and returning for the one day that will keep their job active. We all agree that these people do not belong in the classroom, and we must be able to remove them expeditiously."

I don't know if this will persuade Ms. Rhee's most ardent detractors to rethink their opinions about her, but with contract negotiations soon to resume, it sounds like both sides are trying to put their best foot forward.

She also writes about giving teachers an individual choice on earning pay bonuses, which sounds like she wants to maintain at least that aspect of the red-green tier proposals if not the tenure aspect. It's not clear whether that's still viewed as an option for the Washington Teachers' Union, per this post.

2 Comments

Rhee Speaks? Wrong! Rhee lies! You cannot go from Marie Antoinette to Cinderella after 18 months of nation-wide workforce bashing at taxpayers expense with no reform insight. It's BS! This softer side comes at a time when the appearance of reform must rear its head. The 2010 election of Fenty is just around the corner and he banked his success on the school system. He should have allowed the vetting process to occur and maybe we would have a qualified superintendent and not a rookie, failed teacher and unqualified chancellor. It's too late. Her broom should assist her with an exit.

Rhee Speaks? Wrong! Rhee lies! You cannot go from Marie Antoinette to Cinderella after 18 months of nation-wide workforce bashing at taxpayers expense with no reform insight. It's BS! This softer side comes at a time when the appearance of reform must rear its head. The 2010 election of Fenty is just around the corner and he banked his success on the school system. He should have allowed the vetting process to occur and maybe we would have a qualified superintendent and not a rookie, failed teacher and unqualified chancellor. It's too late. Her broom should assist her with an exit.

Comments are now closed for this post.

Follow This Blog

Advertisement

Most Viewed on Education Week

Categories

Archives

Recent Comments

  • lauren: cell phones are what kids crave on they need a read more
  • enjoyjd: One of the most frustrating things for me, when my read more
  • marty: I was once a superb teacher. Students loved me, parents read more
  • J. S. Gephardt: I totally agree that teachers should be evaluated on a read more
  • Lisa: Senority... most parents want their children in a seasoned teachers read more